[fossil-users] PLOS (II)

2012-12-20 Thread j. van den hoff
hoping that this does not generate so much turbelence as the mv/rm issue did: I've stumbled over this behavior: -- there is a user account on a remote repo created for me (with commit access) -- I do the clone a la `fossil clone http://myname@URL myrepo.fsl and I'm asked correctly for the

Re: [fossil-users] PLOS (II)

2012-12-20 Thread Mike Meyer
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:56 AM, j. van den hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.com wrote: I would find it far more intuitive if _after_ a `clone' of the above sort (password query for `myname' and all) the corresponding local user would be created automagically and also be set to the default user so

Re: [fossil-users] PLOS (II)

2012-12-20 Thread j. v. d. hoff
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 19:37:35 +0100, Mike Meyer m...@mired.org wrote: On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:56 AM, j. van den hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.com wrote: I would find it far more intuitive if _after_ a `clone' of the above sort (password query for `myname' and all) the corresponding local user

Re: [fossil-users] PLOS (II)

2012-12-20 Thread Mike Meyer
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 2:11 PM, j. v. d. hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.com wrote: On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 19:37:35 +0100, Mike Meyer m...@mired.org wrote: I'm just proposing to automate what you do manually in the considered situation (including chosing a different local password, why not?): create

Re: [fossil-users] PLOS (II)

2012-12-20 Thread Nolan Darilek
*stops biting tongue* To be fair, Git and Mercurial each require you to set a username/email address in their respective configuration files. If you don't, commits appear as originating from your login name plus some best-guess attempt at an email address. *watches as various folks scramble