Re: [fossil-users] Timeline bug: horizontal merge arrow without vertical

2016-12-13 Thread Richard Hipp
On 12/11/16, Andy Goth wrote: > http://core.tcl.tk/tcl/timeline?a=b40778af44=7054e2f2eb Fixed. > > The marked check-in merges from trunk, but trunk is not visible on the > timeline. In similar situations in the past I believe there were merge > arrows coming from the

[fossil-users] Timeline bug: horizontal merge arrow without vertical

2016-12-10 Thread Andy Goth
http://core.tcl.tk/tcl/timeline?a=b40778af44=7054e2f2eb The marked check-in merges from trunk, but trunk is not visible on the timeline. In similar situations in the past I believe there were merge arrows coming from the bottom of the timeline, but in this instance only the horizontal line is

Re: [fossil-users] Timeline bug (event types)

2013-01-20 Thread Richard Hipp
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Marc Simpson m...@0branch.com wrote: It seems that commit [f76d912f1d] (which modified the base SQL used in timeline queries) has introduced a bug into trunk: nothing is returned when event types are specified as switches to `timeline'. Fix here:

Re: [fossil-users] Timeline bug (event types)

2013-01-20 Thread Marc Simpson
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Marc Simpson m...@0branch.com wrote: It seems that commit [f76d912f1d] (which modified the base SQL used in timeline queries) has introduced a bug into trunk: nothing is returned when

[fossil-users] Timeline bug (event types)

2013-01-19 Thread Marc Simpson
It seems that commit [f76d912f1d] (which modified the base SQL used in timeline queries) has introduced a bug into trunk: nothing is returned when event types are specified as switches to `timeline'. Demonstration: here's the timeline for wiki pages in the main Fossil repo output by build

Re: [fossil-users] timeline bug?

2013-01-16 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 5:48 PM, j. van den hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.comwrote: is this a bug or a feature? I do hope the former since it's really bad behaviour when driving `fossil' with a script. It's an as designed bug. The argument handling is based on the argument count, and an empty

Re: [fossil-users] timeline bug?

2013-01-16 Thread j. van den hoff
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 18:28:24 +0100, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 5:48 PM, j. van den hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.comwrote: is this a bug or a feature? I do hope the former since it's really bad behaviour when driving `fossil' with a script. It's an as

Re: [fossil-users] timeline bug?

2013-01-16 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 6:54 PM, j. van den hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.comwrote: thanks for clarification. I understand that empty arguments can make sense in some cases (whether empty commits really do, we don't quite agree, obviously...) but I nevertheless don't understand what We

Re: [fossil-users] timeline bug?

2013-01-16 Thread Eric
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:48:52 +0100, j. van den hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.com wrote: hi, incidentally (when calling fossil from with a script constructing the suitable call) I noted that +fossil timeline ''+ (i.e. appending an empty string '' after `timeline') shows the

Re: [fossil-users] timeline bug?

2013-01-16 Thread j. v. d. hoff
for completeness sake: did not hit 'reply all' the first time (thus skipped replying to the list), so here it is. On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 20:55:48 +0100, Eric e...@deptj.eu wrote: On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:48:52 +0100, j. van den hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.com wrote: hi, incidentally (when