Re: [fossil-users] The "fbapp:" scheme in the HTTP REFERER

here are three references that use that number. looks like it is due to java code for accessing facebook. https://jrcorner.wordpress.com/2013/01/22/fetching-facebook-graph-data-with-go/ https://github.com/yappbox/FacebookConnect/blob/master/src/android/facebook/Facebook.java

Re: [fossil-users] Semi-annual drumming-up-of-support for libfossil

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Carlo Miron wrote: > Still using Emacs :-? > er yes, but i am adjusting to the right hand for the ctrl key :/. Or trying to. -- - stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal "Freedom is sloppy. But since

[fossil-users] The "fbapp:" scheme in the HTTP REFERER

The #1 source of external visits to the Fossil website over the past 48 hours (according to webserver logs) has been: fbapp://350685531728/newsfeed_image_share_view Can anybody tell me how to view that content? Presumably "fbapp" is shorthand for "Facebook Application". But what does the

Re: [fossil-users] What does the “Older” button's intended to do in the web UI?

On 1/16/16, Yannick Duchêne wrote: > Hi people, > > I though the “Older” link in the HTML UI, was like a “next page” link. That's what it is suppose to do. > > Doing fine grained commits (I'm afraid of doing something wrong), I have > many commits on something I

Re: [fossil-users] Semi-annual drumming-up-of-support for libfossil

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 8:22 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: >> >> While i have been partially disabled for just over a year by an elbow >> nerve injury caused by too many/too long hacking sessions

Re: [fossil-users] What does the “Older” button's intended to do in the web UI?

On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 11:58:56 +0100 Yannick Duchêne wrote: > > The “Newer” link does not behave the same, it does not forgot anything. So at > least “Newer” and “Older” are not symmetric. > Finally not, it forgot newer entries :-/ It does not find entries newer than

Re: [fossil-users] What does the “Older” button's intended to do in the web UI?

On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 22:31:44 +0100 Yannick Duchêne wrote: > Hi people, > > I though the “Older” link in the HTML UI, was like a “next page” link. > > Doing fine grained commits (I'm afraid of doing something wrong), I have many > commits on something I started to

Re: [fossil-users] Semi-annual drumming-up-of-support for libfossil

On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 8:22 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > While i have been partially disabled for just over a year by an elbow > nerve injury caused by too many/too long hacking sessions (seriously!), i > am slowly getting back into it > And i spoke too soon. That

Re: [fossil-users] What does the “Older” button's intended to do in the web UI?

On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 08:16:46 -0500 Richard Hipp wrote: > On 1/16/16, Yannick Duchêne wrote: > > Hi people, > > > > I though the “Older” link in the HTML UI, was like a “next page” link. > > That's what it is suppose to do. So it was not an erroneous

Re: [fossil-users] What does the “Older” button's intended to do in the web UI?

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Yannick Duchêne wrote: > I don't mind, but the *.fossil file 5MB, too big for an attachment in a > mailing list, and it contains private data. Should I send it to you > directly? > Don't forget that most file-hosting services (Dropbox,

Re: [fossil-users] Semi-annual drumming-up-of-support for libfossil

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 8:24 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Carlo Miron wrote: > >> Still using Emacs :-? >> > > er yes, but i am adjusting to the right hand for the ctrl key :/. Or > trying to. > > -- > - stephan beal >

Re: [fossil-users] What does the “Older” button's intended to do in the web UI?

Thus said Yannick =?UTF-8?B?RHVjaMOqbmU=?= on Sat, 16 Jan 2016 22:31:44 +0100: > Doing fine grained commits (I'm afraid of doing something wrong), I > have many commits on something I started to version with Fossil. The > time-line page says ``Max: 50''. I can see the 50 newest commits, the

Re: [fossil-users] Semi-annual drumming-up-of-support for libfossil

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 8:24 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Carlo Miron wrote: > >> Still using Emacs :-? >> > > er yes, but i am adjusting to the right hand for the ctrl key :/. Or > trying to. > At least you can get

Re: [fossil-users] content does not match sha1 hash

On 1/18/16, Ben Ventura wrote: > It’s likely that I do have the content for it, but I’m not sure how to > figure out which file it is - how can I translate the artifact ID into a > file path? On each repository, simply run "fossil whatis a0940f3ea". If the artifact

Re: [fossil-users] content does not match sha1 hash

Thanks, I’m on it. We are just a 3-man team here so we should be able to figure out what the file was and resurrect it. I’ll let you know what happens after running the instructions you’ve sent. --- Ben Ventura Director of Software Engineering

Re: [fossil-users] Move git repo to fossil wiki

On 1/18/16, Jonathan Otsuka wrote: >> >> Can you use "embedded documentation" >> (https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/doc/cd58f59a474c7ef773d1/www/embeddeddoc.wiki) >> instead of Wiki? That way you can import using "fossil import"... >> >> Almost all of the Fossil documentation

Re: [fossil-users] content does not match sha1 hash

thanks - so unfortunately no repo returns anything other than “name” .. I tried each one and they all say: administrator@ben-dev:/var/www/fossil$ fossil whatis a0940f3ea name: a0940f3ea The server had a bit more but essentially the same thing:

Re: [fossil-users] content does not match sha1 hash

It’s likely that I do have the content for it, but I’m not sure how to figure out which file it is - how can I translate the artifact ID into a file path? --- Ben Ventura Director of Software Engineering World Trade Press 800 Lindberg Lane, Suite 190

Re: [fossil-users] A few questions

On 1/18/16, Damien Sykes-Pendleton wrote: > Hi there. > I may have missed these points when looking through the available > documentation, so forgive me if they are already covered somewhere. > 1. Can Fossil email its user list when a change has been made, for example

Re: [fossil-users] content does not match sha1 hash

On 1/18/16, Ben Ventura wrote: > thanks - so unfortunately no repo returns anything other than “name” .. I > tried each one and they all say: > > administrator@ben-dev:/var/www/fossil$ fossil whatis a0940f3ea > name: a0940f3ea > > > The server had a bit

Re: [fossil-users] content does not match sha1 hash

Just to double check - where did the number 53623 you mentioned in the commands come from: > fossil test-content-erase 53623 > fossil rebuild > fossil test-integrity Are you sure that’s not supposed to be “a0940f3ea” (the artifact in question)

Re: [fossil-users] content does not match sha1 hash

OK I see now - you got the number from the integrity check- disregard my last message: ubuntu@ip-172-31-30-28:/home/fossil/repo$ fossil test-integrity laravel skip phantom 53591 4126483354e977987ecde6f8b6ea8152c48ad0ad checksum mismatch on artifact 53623: wanted

[fossil-users] Move git repo to fossil wiki

I have a few git repositories I would like to transition to fossil wiki. My current thinking is to iterate through the git history and do fossil wiki commits. We want to keep the history. Is there a better way to do this? Jonathan Otsuka ___

Re: [fossil-users] content does not match sha1 hash

> Please download the tip of trunk from the Fossil repository, and > rebuild fossil on all clients and on the server. Then on the server, > make a backup copy of your repository and then run: > > fossil test-content-erase 53623 > fossil rebuild > fossil test-integrity > > That

Re: [fossil-users] Move git repo to fossil wiki

> On Jan 18, 2016, at 7:20 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > >> On 1/18/16, Jonathan Otsuka wrote: >> I have a few git repositories I would like to transition to fossil wiki. My >> current thinking is to iterate through the git history and do fossil wiki >> commits.

[fossil-users] A few questions

Hi there. I may have missed these points when looking through the available documentation, so forgive me if they are already covered somewhere. 1. Can Fossil email its user list when a change has been made, for example if there has been a new commit? I can’t see a setting for that in Fossil

Re: [fossil-users] Move git repo to fossil wiki

On 1/18/16, Jonathan Otsuka wrote: > I have a few git repositories I would like to transition to fossil wiki. My > current thinking is to iterate through the git history and do fossil wiki > commits. We want to keep the history. Is there a better way to do this? > Can you use

Re: [fossil-users] Move git repo to fossil wiki

> On Jan 18, 2016, at 7:32 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > On 1/18/16, Jonathan Otsuka wrote: >>> >>> Can you use "embedded documentation" >>> (https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/doc/cd58f59a474c7ef773d1/www/embeddeddoc.wiki) >>> instead of Wiki? That way you

Re: [fossil-users] Move git repo to fossil wiki

Thus said Jonathan Otsuka on Mon, 18 Jan 2016 20:24:12 -0600: > Is there a way to convert embedded documentation to wiki format? Are > the internal structures much different? The benefit to the embedded documentation is simply that they are files under revision control. This makes editing

Re: [fossil-users] How to get artifact's content as raw text in one click?

Thus said Sergei Gavrikov on Sun, 17 Jan 2016 13:28:05 +0300: > > > When *text* files have unknown MIME type (unknown extension) we > > > cannot download them (in a fact to get a raw view in a browser) > > > just in click. > > I may do check-in really text files, e.g. some statistics

Re: [fossil-users] content does not match sha1 hash

On 1/18/16, Ben Ventura wrote: > > Hello, > > We’ve been running fossil on Ubuntu 14.04 for about a year; all of a sudden > a problem has cropped up where it gives this message when attempting ‘fossil > update': > > "content does not match sha1 hash" > > We get it

Re: [fossil-users] content does not match sha1 hash

THanks - OK that did turn something up: ubuntu@ip-172-31-30-28:/home/fossil/repo$ fossil test-integrity laravel skip phantom 53591 4126483354e977987ecde6f8b6ea8152c48ad0ad checksum mismatch on artifact 53623: wanted a0940f3ea7c6562d59680194593b437d76965b06 but got

Re: [fossil-users] content does not match sha1 hash

I’m not sure how to check .. can I get a file path from the archive number with some command, how can I figure out what file it’s referring to? --- Ben Ventura Director of Software Engineering World Trade Press 800 Lindberg Lane, Suite 190 Petaluma,

Re: [fossil-users] content does not match sha1 hash

On 1/18/16, Richard Hipp wrote: > On 1/18/16, Ben Ventura wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> We’ve been running fossil on Ubuntu 14.04 for about a year; all of a >> sudden >> a problem has cropped up where it gives this message when attempting >> ‘fossil >>

[fossil-users] content does not match sha1 hash

Hello, We’ve been running fossil on Ubuntu 14.04 for about a year; all of a sudden a problem has cropped up where it gives this message when attempting ‘fossil update': "content does not match sha1 hash" We get it on everyone’s workspace when they try to run “fossil update”, and the

Re: [fossil-users] content does not match sha1 hash

My server’s web UI refers to it as a “control artifact” : " http://my.website.com:8080/info/a0940f3ea7c6562d59680194593b437d76965b06 Artifact a0940f3ea7c6562d59680194593b437d76965b06: Control artifact. " --- Ben Ventura Director of Software

Re: [fossil-users] How to get artifact's content as raw text in one click?

On Mon, 18 Jan 2016, Andy Bradford wrote: > Thus said Sergei Gavrikov on Sun, 17 Jan 2016 13:28:05 +0300: > > > > > When *text* files have unknown MIME type (unknown extension) > > > > we cannot download them (in a fact to get a raw view in a > > > > browser) just in click. > > > > I may do

Re: [fossil-users] content does not match sha1 hash

On 1/18/16, Ben Ventura wrote: > THanks - OK that did turn something up: > > > ubuntu@ip-172-31-30-28:/home/fossil/repo$ fossil test-integrity laravel > skip phantom 53591 4126483354e977987ecde6f8b6ea8152c48ad0ad > checksum mismatch on artifact 53623: wanted >

Re: [fossil-users] content does not match sha1 hash

Sorry I’m not sure I know the exact command to do that - I tried: fossil artifact a0940f3ea7c6562d59680194593b437d76965b06 And it gives an empty result, no output.. is that the command you wanting me to try? --- Ben Ventura Director of

Re: [fossil-users] content does not match sha1 hash

On 1/18/16, Ben Ventura wrote: > Sorry I’m not sure I know the exact command to do that - I tried: > > fossil artifact a0940f3ea7c6562d59680194593b437d76965b06 > > And it gives an empty result, no output.. is that the command you wanting me > to try? > That's the