Re: [fossil-users] Further mailing list configuration changes.

Thus said "K. Fossil user" on Mon, 27 Jun 2016 20:10:53 -: > I don't understand why the Fossil team don't create a poll about the > Mailing list behavior people may want? Are the responses not sent to the previous thread regarding the changes sufficient? Andy -- TAI64 timestamp:

Re: [fossil-users] Adding a mailing list to Fossil SCM

> On Jun 27, 2016, at 10:14 PM, Andy Bradford > wrote: > > Thus said Jonathan Otsuka on Mon, 27 Jun 2016 22:04:12 -0500: > >> With all the back and forth about the mailing list changes. If you are >> already using Fossil SCM to

[fossil-users] Adding a mailing list to Fossil SCM

With all the back and forth about the mailing list changes. If you are already using Fossil SCM to manage a wiki, source code management, issue tracker adding a mailing list feature isn’t too far fetched. Has this idea been brought up before? Jonathan Otsuka

Re: [fossil-users] Your membership in the fossil-users mailing list is currently disabled due to excessive bounces

Thus said "K. Fossil user" on Mon, 27 Jun 2016 20:13:25 -: > I've received that message :"Your membership in the fossil-users > mailing list is currently disabled due to excessive bounces" It's possible that it was a mistake due to further attempts at modifying how the list works. Did

Re: [fossil-users] Adding a mailing list to Fossil SCM

Thus said Jonathan Otsuka on Mon, 27 Jun 2016 22:04:12 -0500: > With all the back and forth about the mailing list changes. If you are > already using Fossil SCM to manage a wiki, source code management, > issue tracker adding a mailing list feature isn't too far fetched. > > Has this idea

Re: [fossil-users] Further mailing list configuration changes.

Thus said Richard Hipp on Mon, 27 Jun 2016 06:12:50 +0200: > Further changes might occur depending on how this one goes. What are your thoughts on some of the proposed methods for attempting to auto-unsubscribe any bots? Specifically, having a daily MOTD that is emailed to all subscribers and

[fossil-users] Is there such an scm with GUI?

In such an scm with GUI, one can: 1. diff / merge / rebase by draging one commit to another 2. more generally, everything can be done in the GUI, it can be intuitive enough, so that no doc is needed 3. by the easy usage and full functionality, it helps the programmer focus on his/her essential

Re: [fossil-users] Further mailing list configuration changes.

On Jun 26, 2016 9:13 PM, "Richard Hipp" wrote: > > The "From:" removal has been turned off and in its place "Reply-To:" > removal has been turned on. This is a test message to verify the new > configuration. So is this basically how it was configured previously? Your email

Re: [fossil-users] Further mailing list configuration changes.

I don't understand why the Fossil team don't create a poll about the Mailing list behavior people may want ?Is it so hard to do ? The main reason i've read, that people said, was : "Dear Fossil, we could not filter so don't change the first behavior".My filters run correctly why not the others

[fossil-users] Your membership in the fossil-users mailing list is currently disabled due to excessive bounces

Hello again, I've received that message :"Your membership in the fossil-users mailing list is currently disabled due to excessive bounces" That's not serious ... ><  Best Regards K.___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org

Re: [fossil-users] Further mailing list configuration changes.

On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 14:05:28 +0800 Barry Arthur wrote: > I'm glad to hear that. However, we do not know the number of subscribers via Gmane - I'm the one and survived. :-) Sincerely, Gour -- Before giving up this present body, if one is able to tolerate the urges of