Re: [fossil-users] listing during commit

2012-10-18 Thread Jan Nijtmans
source, it was Ok. So I suspect that the win32 binary was not a clean build. Maybe some local debugging code was added which was never committed. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil version 1.24 on Monday?

2012-10-21 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2012/10/19 Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org: It's been a couple of months since the last official release, so it seems about time to do another. I propose to release the tip of trunk as version 1.24 on Monday. If anybody knows of a reason why this should not occur or should be delayed, please

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil version 1.24 on Monday?

2012-10-21 Thread Jan Nijtmans
. If it doesn't work, the binary will just behave as if Tcl is not installed, nothing will crash. The Tcl stubs mechanism does't depend on compiler or runtime, so if Tcl is compiled with a different compiler than fossil, it still will work fine. Regards, Jan Nijtmans

Re: [fossil-users] Wiki naming limitations

2012-10-24 Thread Jan Nijtmans
can really judge that. The more people try it and report their success (or not), the more likely that it will go in eventually. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080

Re: [fossil-users] V1.24 make test

2012-10-24 Thread Jan Nijtmans
--user username here, as it can be derived from the command-line already which username is required Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo

Re: [fossil-users] problem with -A USERNAME option for `fossil new`

2012-11-05 Thread Jan Nijtmans
, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] filename contains illegal characters

2012-11-19 Thread Jan Nijtmans
converter, not in fossil itself. Quotes are not illegal in fossil, but the backslash character is. Proof: $ fossil add str'i'ng.h ADDED win/str'i'ng.h $ fossil status ... ADDED str'i'ng.h See, no problem to add it at all. Regards, Jan Nijtmans

Re: [fossil-users] filename contains illegal characters

2012-11-19 Thread Jan Nijtmans
: string.h) but apart from that everything could be made to work fine. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] filename contains illegal characters

2012-11-20 Thread Jan Nijtmans
see a way to work around the two remaining problematic characters. I think this deserves a lot more testing. I will Regards, jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin

Re: [fossil-users] filename contains illegal characters

2012-11-22 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2012/11/22 Stefan Bellon sbel...@sbellon.de: On Thu, 22 Nov, Jan Nijtmans wrote: Stefan, could you try out [e6a1910fa8]? This sounds very cool. :-) However I still get: $ ~/tmp/fossil addremove [...] /home/bellonsn/tmp/fossil: filename contains illegal characters: str\i\ng.h ... Am I

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil design error and possible ways to fix it

2012-11-22 Thread Jan Nijtmans
are displayed unchanged. - If more elaborate wiki markup is needed, it can always be edited later in the UI. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil design error and possible ways to fix it

2012-11-22 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2012/11/22 Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com: On 22 November 2012 14:35, Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.com wrote: I think I would fix that in the comment preprocessor. The major disadvantage is, of course, that this ugly mess will be likely visible in the command line view of the commits

Re: [fossil-users] filename contains illegal characters

2012-11-25 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2012/11/22 Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.com: 2012/11/22 Stefan Bellon sbel...@sbellon.de: On Thu, 22 Nov, Jan Nijtmans wrote: Stefan, could you try out [e6a1910fa8]? This sounds very cool. :-) New test version in [d3bee356ba]. It changes the filename contains illegal characters fatal

Re: [fossil-users] How to force commit?

2012-11-25 Thread Jan Nijtmans
and rough patch is of some value. Sure it is! I cannot test it now, but this is how I would expect it to work. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman

Re: [fossil-users] How to force commit?

2012-11-25 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2012/11/25 Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.com: 2012/11/25 Stefan Bellon sbel...@sbellon.de: Attached you'll find a patch that adds the unicode-glob to the settings and respects its setting in the check-in. Additionally I disabled all the check-in warnings (crnl, binary and unicode) in case

Re: [fossil-users] How to force commit?

2012-11-26 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2012/11/25 Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org: 2012/11/25 Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.com: Stefan, I committed your patch to the bellon-unicode branch. Feedback welcome! At first sight, looks good to me. Stefan, please fill out http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/doc/trunk/www/copyright

Re: [fossil-users] How to force commit?

2012-11-26 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2012/11/26 Stefan Bellon sbel...@sbellon.de: On Mon, 26 Nov, Jan Nijtmans wrote: Finally, I had a look at the bellon-unicode branch. I like the new --no-warnings flag, being less dangerous as the --force flag. The question is whether the naming of this new option is a good one Agreed

Re: [fossil-users] filename contains illegal characters

2012-11-27 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2012/11/25 Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.com: New test version in [d3bee356ba]. It changes the filename contains illegal characters fatal into a warning, which should make your situation more managable: Even though files containing '\' still cannot be handled, they don't stop the fossil

Re: [fossil-users] [1.24/Win] Adding files through *.html?

2012-11-30 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2012/11/30 Gilles gilles.gana...@free.fr: 1. BTW, if the MinGW version offers better support for shell use, why is the Windows binary compiled with MSVC? The Windows binary is compiled with MinGW, only the commandline parser is replaced, in order to fix bugs like [13b7388964], [490b6c2edd]

Re: [fossil-users] [1.24/Win] Adding files through *.html?

2012-11-30 Thread Jan Nijtmans
, the mentioned utf-8 bugs were re-introduced. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] [1.24/Win] Adding files through *.html?

2012-11-30 Thread Jan Nijtmans
'*'/'?' Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] [1.24/Win] Adding files through *.html?

2012-11-30 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2012/11/30 Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.com: Would switching the default build from MinGW to MinGW-w64 be an option? I tested the command-line expansion feature from MinGW-w64. It works! See [b1036fe5bf]. Should work on MSVC as well, but still untested. Doesn't work on MinGW, because

Re: [fossil-users] Documentation improvement about building under Cygwin

2012-11-30 Thread Jan Nijtmans
. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] [1.24/Win] Adding files through *.html?

2012-11-30 Thread Jan Nijtmans
mbcs-utf-8 conversion. for other PREFIX values, use wmain and do unicode-utf-8 conversion. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil

Re: [fossil-users] [1.24/Win] Adding files through *.html?

2012-11-30 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2012/11/30 Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org: Can you suggest makefile changes to make this happen? Done in [2459ee7b71]. Biggest advantage: the parse_windows_command_line() is not necessary any more. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing

Re: [fossil-users] [1.24/Win] Adding files through *.html?

2012-11-30 Thread Jan Nijtmans
the limitation that only characters from the current code-page can be used. But when compiled with MinGW-w64, that limitation doesn't exist any more: Any character can be used on the commandline can be used, no matter what the code-page is. I'll work out an example. Regards, Jan Nijtmans

Re: [fossil-users] [1.24/Win] Adding files through *.html?

2012-11-30 Thread Jan Nijtmans
express). MinGW is lacking the -municode option, that's why this cannot be fixed using MinGW. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil version 1.25 scheduled.

2012-11-30 Thread Jan Nijtmans
. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] filename contains illegal characters

2012-12-01 Thread Jan Nijtmans
of these characters in the path: \*[]? Comment was not updated accordingly. Done now. Thanks! Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil

[fossil-users] Fwd: Trunk not buildable with MSVC 6.0 (was: Fossil version 1.25 scheduled.)

2012-12-02 Thread Jan Nijtmans
FYI, The functions wcsnlen and wcsncpy_s are not used anywhere in fossil code, they are only used within dirent.h. Therefore, forwarded to Toni Rönkkö, for suggestions what to do with it. Is it worth to fix it? Regards, Jan Nijtmans -- Forwarded message -- From

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil version 1.25 scheduled.

2012-12-02 Thread Jan Nijtmans
for the complete list of Office 2007 mime-types and all possible extensions. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] How to force commit?

2013-01-21 Thread Jan Nijtmans
in the fossil web UI. This would allow to enhance the file content checking such that it detects invalid utf-8 as well, without the need to add a new *-glob setting. The concept can be found in the improve_commit_warning branch. Feedback appreciated. Regards, Jan Nijtmans

Re: [fossil-users] How to force commit?

2013-01-21 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2013/1/21 Stefan Bellon sbel...@sbellon.de: On Mon, 21 Jan, Jan Nijtmans wrote: This patch is now in trunk already, but I'm just wondering if the unicode-globwouldn't better be named encoding-glob. The actual purpose of this warning is not whether some file contains unicode, the fact

Re: [fossil-users] How to force commit?

2013-01-21 Thread Jan Nijtmans
alternative. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] How to force commit?

2013-01-24 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2013/1/21 Stefan Bellon sbel...@sbellon.de: On Mon, 21 Jan, Jan Nijtmans wrote: I don't mind what the default is, as long as I can configure it to give me the warnings. That's what the 3 *-glob settings are providing. Ok, then I misunderstood you when you reasoned with the web UI. As long

[fossil-users] Fwd: _set_errno and older MSVC

2013-01-27 Thread Jan Nijtmans
Forwarded to the dirent.h maintainer. Edward, from your other mails, I understand that you are using Windows NT 4.0, which apparently lacks the _set_errno() in its msvcrt??.dll. That explains why this problem is not discovered before, not many users are using Windows NT 4.0. Regards, Jan

Re: [fossil-users] Building with mingw32-make

2013-01-27 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2013/1/27 Edward Berner e...@bernerfam.com: Hello, When building with mingw32 (and without msys) using a command such as the following: mingw32-make -f win\Makefile.mingw USE_WINDOWS=1 The build fails when it tries to build zlib: Thanks! Committed now. Regards, Jan Nijtmans

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil on Windows NT 4.0

2013-01-29 Thread Jan Nijtmans
of this is not necessary, so I would expect a #ifndef __WIN64 around the changed parts. This will also make it easy to remove the code when no-one uses NT4 any more. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org

Re: [fossil-users] Latest stable release or dev release does not compile with option: --static

2013-01-30 Thread Jan Nijtmans
fossil_strcmp in printf.c Many Thanks! Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Latest stable release or dev release does not compile with option: --static

2013-01-30 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2013/1/30 Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com: On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.com wrote: Fossil's TCL support also appears to use dlopen() - The link flag -ldl is missing on Linux. That's the shared library containing dlopen,so - indeed - without it, Tcl

Re: [fossil-users] Latest stable release or dev release does not compile with option: --static

2013-01-30 Thread Jan Nijtmans
strcmp-fossil_strcmp everywhere, but I don't think you want to do that in sqlite as well, therefore I came up with the macro. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080

Re: [fossil-users] Latest stable release or dev release does not compile with option: --static

2013-01-30 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2013/1/30 Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.com: The $tclconfig(TCL_LIBS) contains the -ldl, but $tclconfig(TCL_STUB_LIB_SPEC) does not, which is OK. (the stub library doesn't use dlopen, fossil does) Somehow, fossil should add -ldl here, such that the --with-tcl-stubs option works

Re: [fossil-users] build error: 'Global' has no member named 'dontKeepUrl'

2013-02-21 Thread Jan Nijtmans
the user whether or not to remember the password, as browsers typically do for their password cache. (user: drh tags: trunk) See: https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/fdiff?v1=bc91379546130792v2=be285f713732c242 Fixed now. Regards, jan Nijtmans

[fossil-users] Check for accessability of HOME directory.

2013-03-01 Thread Jan Nijtmans
it still should be disabled? Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

[fossil-users] Cygwin compilation warningw

2013-03-01 Thread Jan Nijtmans
. Regards, Jan Nijtmans Index: src/os_win.c == --- src/os_win.c +++ src/os_win.c @@ -4115,20 +4115,20 @@ ** for converting the relative path name to an absolute ** one by prepending the data directory

Re: [fossil-users] Several commands not working in Win32/MinGW

2013-03-04 Thread Jan Nijtmans
should only be used on files, not directories. It looks like the $HOME directory was the only directory this check was used on. So this should fix the problem. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org

[fossil-users] Whether or not this function examines the entire contents of the blob is officially unspecified.

2013-03-19 Thread Jan Nijtmans
the highest priority of all flags, it should always be checked first by all calling code. All other flags are meaningless whenever LOOK_NUL is iset. Any objections? Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil

Re: [fossil-users] Whether or not this function examines the entire contents of the blob is officially unspecified.

2013-03-20 Thread Jan Nijtmans
of this mail), and the meaning of the LOOK_SHORT flag: #define LOOK_SHORT ((int)0x0100) /* Unable to perform full check. */ Wouldn't this flags always be 0 then? I'm not in the position to make this decision. Regards, Jan Nijtmans

Re: [fossil-users] Whether or not this function examines the entire contents of the blob is officially unspecified.

2013-03-20 Thread Jan Nijtmans
, not bytes. Thanks! Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

[fossil-users] auto.def:79: Error: Request for undeclared option --markdown

2013-04-01 Thread Jan Nijtmans
for undeclared option --markdown On Windows everything is OK. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] fossil 1.25 Windows XP - open command 'fails'

2013-04-05 Thread Jan Nijtmans
the Rolling back... line? That should give a clue about what's really going on here. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] fossil 1.25 Windows XP - open command 'fails'

2013-04-05 Thread Jan Nijtmans
in the allowed path length than later Windows versions. You could checkout the repository on some short path like C:\foo. Does that work? Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil

Re: [fossil-users] Diff under Windows different than under GNU/Linux

2013-04-08 Thread Jan Nijtmans
, and writes that to the console. The 'bug' is in this conversion, but if stdout is redirected this conversion doesn't take place at all. So, don't be fooled by this console output. When automating this, everything should work OK. Regards, Jan Nijtmans

Re: [fossil-users] Diff under Windows different than under GNU/Linux

2013-04-08 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2013/4/8 Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.com There's also an option (5) (5) Just automate it, doing nothing special. If the consile output is redirected, no matter where to (a file or a pipe), the output will be done as-is. When not re-directed, the console code assumes

Re: [fossil-users] Rename --limit to --count and --test to --nochange

2013-04-23 Thread Jan Nijtmans
it is no longer documented. I also added many short options like -a for --all and -c for --closed (JSON already had those) in places where it was missing. If there are other suggestions or remarks for command-line improvements, they are welcomed! Regards, Jan Nijtmans

Re: [fossil-users] Rename --limit to --count and --test to --nochange

2013-04-24 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2013/4/24 Edward Berner e...@bernerfam.com On 4/23/2013 2:09 AM, Jan Nijtmans wrote: If there are other suggestions or remarks for command-line improvements, they are welcomed! Well... I've noticed that some commands use --verbose and some use --detail. Is that an accidental

[fossil-users] Case (in-)sensitive web-pages

2013-04-24 Thread Jan Nijtmans
-scm.org/index.html/info/c967b6619f. I cannot find any problems with that. Anyone? Did I miss anything? Thanks! Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo

Re: [fossil-users] Case (in-)sensitive web-pages

2013-04-24 Thread Jan Nijtmans
that a goldfish had THAT huge amount of memory.) ;-) Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] current directory is not within an open checkout when viewing files in a server repository

2013-04-28 Thread Jan Nijtmans
be called when the localdb is already open anyway), but it's safer to leave it in: Maybe there is another location in fossil which I'm not aware of where this rule is violated. Thanks for your report! Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Rename --limit to --count and --test to --nochange

2013-05-01 Thread Jan Nijtmans
= in URL parameters. Another small step towards better consistancy. The original options/parameters are retained, so this should not break any existing scripts. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org

[fossil-users] New option --keep, and setting keep-glob for fossil clean

2013-05-03 Thread Jan Nijtmans
: either remove them without asking for confirmation (ignore-glob) or keep them without asking for confirmation (keep-glob). Any other ideas? Should fossil clean be undo-able like fossil revert, or do we expect that people setting ignore-glob know what they are doing? Regards, Jan

Re: [fossil-users] New option --keep, and setting keep-glob for fossil clean

2013-05-03 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2013/5/3 Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.com: Any other ideas? Should fossil clean be undo-able like fossil revert, or do we expect that people setting ignore-glob know what they are doing? Hm. I think an undo-able fossil clean is a good idea anyway for such a dangerous command. And it's

Re: [fossil-users] New option --keep, and setting keep-glob for fossil clean

2013-05-03 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2013/5/3 Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org: Or, perhaps there is a size limit (say 10MiB) above which cleaned files are not undoable. Prompt for conformation prior to deleting an oversized file that will not be undoable. That sounds OK to me. To be continued. Thanks! Jan Nijtmans

Re: [fossil-users] New option --keep, and setting keep-glob for fossil clean

2013-05-14 Thread Jan Nijtmans
/foo.o src/foo.h $ fossil add src/foo.* file src/foo.o should be ignored. Add it (a=all/y/N)? n ADDED src/foo.c ADDED src/foo.h $ fossil add src/foo.* -f ADDED src/foo.c ADDED src/foo.h ADDED src/foo.o $ Feedback appreciated! Regards, Jan Nijtmans

Re: [fossil-users] New option --keep, and setting keep-glob for fossil clean

2013-05-22 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2013/5/21 Alaric Snell-Pym: I *love* it :-D ABS Thanks! As soon as my fossil clean proposal is evaluated, I'll rebase this and put this up for evaluation as well. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users

[fossil-users] Warnings when compiling fossil

2013-05-24 Thread Jan Nijtmans
integer expressions Proposed patch (for SQLite), see below. Regards, Jan Nijtmans Index: src/shell.c == --- src/shell.c +++ src/shell.c @@ -1562,15 +1562,15 @@ isNeg = 1; zArg++; }else if( zArg[0]=='+' ){ zArg

[fossil-users] Ticket [967cedbf20]: fossil extra - Report for subtree

2013-06-20 Thread Jan Nijtmans
/clean should be operated on. Without arguments, the operation stays the same as it is now; it's fully upwards compatible. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin

[fossil-users] 64-bit integers in JSON on Win32/64

2013-06-20 Thread Jan Nijtmans
Hi Stephan, Just noted that JSON (CSON) on win32/64 cannot use 64-bit integers. My attempt to fix this is in: http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/50e8847df7 But becasue CSON is an amalgamation, I'm sure the real fix should be somewhere else. Regards, Jan Nijtmans

Re: [fossil-users] 64 bit rowid bug?

2013-06-20 Thread Jan Nijtmans
this? Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] 64 bit rowid bug?

2013-06-20 Thread Jan Nijtmans
to 153 should be no problem for any compliant implementation. That's a lot more than 132. ! Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil

Re: [fossil-users] 64 bit rowid bug?

2013-06-20 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2013/6/20 Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org: Making this change will only introduce new, real bugs that impact everyday users. Thanks! That's OK with me. But then the question remains why the return-type of db_last_insert_rowid() is not int then? Regards, Jan Nijtmans

Re: [fossil-users] 64 bit rowid bug?

2013-06-21 Thread Jan Nijtmans
for trouble! Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Ticket [967cedbf20]: fossil extra - Report for subtree

2013-06-21 Thread Jan Nijtmans
$ Even if the files are missing locally, they are still in the repository so they should be listed. Fixed now: https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/c0b98195f9 (query borrowed from fossil delete/mv) fossil changes and fossil status still to be done ;-) Regards, Jan Nijtmans

Re: [fossil-users] Ticket [967cedbf20]: fossil extra - Report for subtree

2013-06-21 Thread Jan Nijtmans
, but for everyone else it will take much longer ;-) Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Ticket [967cedbf20]: fossil extra - Report for subtree

2013-06-21 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2013/6/21 Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com: On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: I've already been working on the problem for 10 minutes. Implemented fossil changes and fossil status now, which is much simpler. It took me 25 minutes Regards, Jan

[fossil-users] RFC: new warning messages for fossil clean

2013-06-24 Thread Jan Nijtmans
this: $ fossil clean --ignore compat/\* -f WARNING: KEPT file fossil.exe not removed $ fossil clean --ignore compat/\* --keep -f Removed ignored file: fossil.exe Feedback appreciated! Any objections putting this in trunk? Regards, Jan Nijtmans

Re: [fossil-users] RFC: new warning messages for fossil clean

2013-06-24 Thread Jan Nijtmans
at least show something. Thanks! Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

[fossil-users] Compiler warning

2013-06-27 Thread Jan Nijtmans
for format [-Wformat-extra-args] make -C src/../compat/zlib PREFIX=x86_64-w64-mingw32- -f win32/Makefile.gcc libz.a Here is my proposed fix (actually, for sqlite 3.8.0) Regards, Jan Nijtmans sqlite.patch Description: Binary data ___ fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Windows newb questions

2013-06-27 Thread Jan Nijtmans
- containing only a single character '*' - with your favorite editor and commit it. Then everyone else who checks out your repository can benefit from it too. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org

Re: [fossil-users] Compiler warning

2013-06-28 Thread Jan Nijtmans
it already in the sqlite sources (Thanks!), so it's irrelevant now. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Ticket [967cedbf20]: fossil extra - Report for subtree

2013-07-04 Thread Jan Nijtmans
, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Ticket [967cedbf20]: fossil extra - Report for subtree

2013-07-05 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2013/7/4 Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.com: Well, when I did this commit: http://core.tcl.tk/itcl/info/0805477fbf what I did was a fossil commit . while the current directory was generic. So, why was Makefile.in committed then? Found the bug: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html

Re: [fossil-users] Ticket [967cedbf20]: fossil extra - Report for subtree

2013-07-09 Thread Jan Nijtmans
in the commit process there will be a panic anyway when expected files are missing. The commit will be rolled back then. No way that Richard could have figured out all situations in 5 minutes, not even 3 ;-) Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil

Re: [fossil-users] Enhancement: commit and close merged leaf

2013-07-10 Thread Jan Nijtmans
does that sound? Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Enhancement: commit and close merged leaf

2013-07-11 Thread Jan Nijtmans
is the actual closing of the branch, but everything else should be there ;-) A nice thing is that if you decide not to commit the change, the integrated branch is never closed. You can do a fossil undo or fossil revert and everything is gone. Regards, Jan Nijtmans

Re: [fossil-users] Enhancement: commit and close merged leaf

2013-07-12 Thread Jan Nijtmans
think i just went from glass half full to glass half empty on this topic :/. Well, just try out the merge-integrate branch. I would say the glass is full again.;-) Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil

Re: [fossil-users] Random thoughts on Fossil v2

2013-07-22 Thread Jan Nijtmans
:) A similar think is already in development now, See: https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/timeline?r=tkt-change-hook It is meant for Ticket and Commit hooks, but more hooks could be added the same way. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil on cygwin64

2013-07-24 Thread Jan Nijtmans
=x86_64-w64-mingw32- Then you get a WIN64 version of fossil.exe which works in any environment (Cygwin32, Cygwin64, Msys, CMD), and is super fast. All Cygwin64 and Cygwin32 dll's have the same name, so you cannot mix executables from those two environments. Regards, Jan Nijtmans

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil on cygwin64

2013-07-25 Thread Jan Nijtmans
:\Windows directory! Cygwin clears the Windows environment space, therefore none of the environment variables can be found. Proposed solution here (should move to sqlite if accepted): http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/fec3c7fe3a Regards, Jan Nijtmans

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil on cygwin64

2013-07-25 Thread Jan Nijtmans
it is. Unfortunately! I'm trying to find out what the minimum patch is to get the Cygwin build of fossil (both 32-bit and 64-bit) working again, so fossil can be built out-of-the box on Cygwin again. Of course, any feedback is welcome. Regards, Jan Nijtmans

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil on cygwin64

2013-07-25 Thread Jan Nijtmans
style, so it will need some more work. Regards, Jan Nijtmans sqlite3-3.7.17-3.src.patch Description: Binary data ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil on cygwin64

2013-07-26 Thread Jan Nijtmans
be a logical step. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Enhancement: commit and close merged leaf

2013-07-30 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2013/7/12 Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com: On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Jan Nijtmans wrote: Well, just try out the merge-integrate branch. I would say the glass is full again.;-) Indeed it is! i like what you've done :) I made one additional change: adding states

Re: [fossil-users] Enhancement: commit and close merged leaf

2013-07-30 Thread Jan Nijtmans
, just keeping some room for future improvements. -3 is just as good. Thanks! Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Enhancement: commit and close merged leaf

2013-07-30 Thread Jan Nijtmans
to determine which branches should be closed. Existing merges never produce id=-4 so the query will give the empty result then. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080

Re: [fossil-users] Enhancement: commit and close merged leaf

2013-07-30 Thread Jan Nijtmans
the --integrate option, the vmerge table is where this information can be found. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Enhancement: commit and close merged leaf

2013-08-02 Thread Jan Nijtmans
the timeline doesn't display Closed Leaf for [53ce8d2863], I would expect it to be there indicating that this fork no longer can be committed to. Looks like a (minor) bug to me. Thanks! Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Enhancement: commit and close merged leaf

2013-08-02 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2013/8/2 Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.com: 2013/8/2 Andy Bradford amb-sendok-1377995615.lfipjljlncecmjghe...@bradfords.org: Does this mean that the merged fork is no longer a leaf at all? If this is the case, why assign a closed tag to it? ... Using --integrate makes it impossible

Re: [fossil-users] Enhancement: commit and close merged leaf

2013-08-02 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2013/8/2 Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.com: If the merged is not a leaf anymore, due to the commit itself, I would expect this function to protect from adding a closed tag (even though it doesn't really harm here). Hm. Bug fixed here: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info

Re: [fossil-users] Notification on new tickets

2013-08-05 Thread Jan Nijtmans
your findings. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

  1   2   3   4   5   >