Re: [fossil-users] Fossil binary file size on FreeBSD (amd64)

2018-06-11 Thread Florian Balmer
Stephan Beal:

> Try stripping the debug symbols:
> strip fossil

Thank you for the useful tip, now down to 3.6 MB!

My MSVC/WinSDK toolset doesn't provide the equivalent utilities any
more, as everything is controlled by compiler and linker flags -- and
obviously for a longer time than my long-term memory span :)

--Florian
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] Fossil binary file size on FreeBSD (amd64)

2018-06-11 Thread Stephan Beal
Try stripping the debug symbols:

strip fossil

- stephan
Sent from a mobile device, possibly left-handed from bed. Please excuse
brevity, typos, and top-posting.


On Mon, Jun 11, 2018, 07:55 Florian Balmer  wrote:

> When building Fossil on a recent out-of-the-box FreeBSD (amd64)
> virtual machine, the resulting binary file is about 10.1 MB. The
> binary files downloaded form [0] are at most 3.8 MB.
>
> [0] http://pkg.freebsd.org/
>
> I have tried various ./configure options, FOSSIL_DYNAMIC_BUILD is
> enabled (=1), and TCL seems to be disabled by default (or, is it?).
>
> Not that it matters (these times are over), but out of curiosity, why
> is there such a difference?
>
> --Florian
> ___
> fossil-users mailing list
> fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
> http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
>
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


[fossil-users] Fossil binary file size on FreeBSD (amd64)

2018-06-10 Thread Florian Balmer
When building Fossil on a recent out-of-the-box FreeBSD (amd64)
virtual machine, the resulting binary file is about 10.1 MB. The
binary files downloaded form [0] are at most 3.8 MB.

[0] http://pkg.freebsd.org/

I have tried various ./configure options, FOSSIL_DYNAMIC_BUILD is
enabled (=1), and TCL seems to be disabled by default (or, is it?).

Not that it matters (these times are over), but out of curiosity, why
is there such a difference?

--Florian
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users