Re: [fossil-users] Fossil version 2.3 - 10th anniversary edition

[Andy Goth]

On 07/12/17 13:50, Richard Hipp wrote:

The current plan is to release the 10th anniversary edition of Fossil,
version 2.3, on 2017-07-21.


I've been more-or-less keeping SlackBuilds up-to-date on Fossil 
releases, even though it's been a long time since I announced that I'm 
doing this.  Earlier this year I expanded my build script README to do a 
better job of explaining what's so cool about Fossil.  Have a look:


https://slackbuilds.org/repository/14.2/development/fossil/

If anyone has any suggestions or corrections, please let me know so I 
can incorporate them into the README for the SlackBuild for the next 
Fossil release.

___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil version 2.3 - 10th anniversary edition

[Andy Bradford]

Thus said Ross Berteig on Fri, 21 Jul 2017 11:13:47 -0700:

> These  are tests  that failed,  but were  not expected  to fail.  They
> should be investigated, especially as they did not fail in my builds.

It looks  like the output is  different than what the  test expects. For
example, with symlinks-dir-6, if I run the command manually, I get:

$ fossil extras
subdirA/f1.txt
subdirA/f2.txt
symdirA

But the test is expecting:

subdirA/f1.txt
subdirA/f2.txt
symdirA/f2.txt

At  this point  I'm not  sure which  output is  correct. This  will take
further investigation later I suppose.

Andy
-- 
TAI64 timestamp: 4000597267f2


___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil version 2.3 - 10th anniversary edition

[Ross Berteig]

On 7/20/2017 8:14 PM, Andy Bradford wrote:

I tested  against ae83b2137f and  it looks  alright I suppose.  What are
``Considered failures?''

* Final results: 5 errors out of 34965 tests
* Considered failures: symlinks-dir-6 symlinks-dir-11 symlinks-dir-12 
symlinks-dir-13 symlinks-dir-16


These are tests that failed, but were not expected to fail. They should 
be investigated, especially as they did not fail in my builds. I built 
on Windows 10, with GCC. Windows and symlinks are generally not friends, 
so I imagine you are not building on Windows?



* Ignored results: 5 ignored errors out of 34965 tests
* Ignored failures: merge5-sqlite3-issue stash-1-diff stash-WY-1-CODE 
stash-3-2 stash-3-2-show-1


These are tests that are "expected" to fail for a variety of reasons. 
They are marked with "knownBug" flag in the test suite. Sometimes the 
bug is actually in the test case. We really ought to make some time to 
review every use of "knownBug".


If tester.tcl is invoked with the -strict flag, then tests marked 
knownBug that succeeded count as failures to draw attention to a known 
bug that got fixed.


--
Ross Berteig   r...@cheshireeng.com
Cheshire Engineering Corp.   http://www.CheshireEng.com/
+1 626 303 1602
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil version 2.3 - 10th anniversary edition

[Andy Bradford]

Thus said Ross Berteig on Thu, 20 Jul 2017 11:35:39 -0700:

> Well, I  missed that target,  but I did build  and run the  test suite
> against the tip of trunk, [4872a58b] .
>
> The only failure was the test pre-commit-warnings-fossil-1.

I tested  against ae83b2137f and  it looks  alright I suppose.  What are
``Considered failures?''

* Final results: 5 errors out of 34965 tests
* Considered failures: symlinks-dir-6 symlinks-dir-11 symlinks-dir-12 
symlinks-dir-13 symlinks-dir-16
* Ignored results: 5 ignored errors out of 34965 tests
* Ignored failures: merge5-sqlite3-issue stash-1-diff stash-WY-1-CODE 
stash-3-2 stash-3-2-show-1

Andy
-- 
TAI64 timestamp: 4000597171bd


___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil version 2.3 - 10th anniversary edition

[Richard Hipp]

On 7/20/17, Ross Berteig  wrote:
> None of that should block the planned release of fossil 2.3.
>

Thanks.  I'll tag the release and do the builds after midnight UTC tonight.

-- 
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil version 2.3 - 10th anniversary edition

[Ross Berteig]

On 7/12/2017 2:08 PM, Ross Berteig wrote:

On 7/12/2017 11:50 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:

The current plan is to release the 10th anniversary edition of Fossil,
version 2.3, on 2017-07-21.


I will dust off my test-maven hat and see what happens with clean 
builds tortured by the test suite, possibly as soon as later this 
afternoon.


Well, I missed that target, but I did build and run the test suite 
against the tip of trunk, [4872a58b] .


The only failure was the test pre-commit-warnings-fossil-1. That test 
case is sensitive to changes in the set of files in the current version 
of the repository, and so is unstable. A file with long lines was 
included in the new bootstrap skin, which changed the output of fossil 
test-commit-warning.


I updated the reference output used in the test case, but the better 
long term solution is to not make test cases that are sensitive to the 
content of the repository. I started building sample files to stimulate 
various warnings a while back. That should be reviewed, and extended 
with the ultimate goal of removing the test that failed this time.


None of that should block the planned release of fossil 2.3.

--
Ross Berteig   r...@cheshireeng.com
Cheshire Engineering Corp.   http://www.CheshireEng.com/
+1 626 303 1602

___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil version 2.3 - 10th anniversary edition

[Ross Berteig]

On 7/12/2017 11:50 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:

The current plan is to release the 10th anniversary edition of Fossil,
version 2.3, on 2017-07-21.


I will dust off my test-maven hat and see what happens with clean builds 
tortured by the test suite, possibly as soon as later this afternoon.



  Note, however, that it is the trunk that will have been
tested.

For testing purposes, the latest trunk version of Fossil is running on
these websites:

  https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil
  https://www.sqlite.org/src/
  http://www2.sqlite.org/src/
  https://www3.sqlite.org/cgi/src
  https://core.tcl.tk/

--

Ross Berteig   r...@cheshireeng.com
Cheshire Engineering Corp.   http://www.CheshireEng.com/
+1 626 303 1602

___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users