Re: [fossil-users] Further mailing list configuration changes.

Mime Digest format might help, at least in the short term, depending on your email client. That is consider that each message posted to the list was sent out as a mime digest with just one message, and was sent out immediately rather than being held till a scheduled release time. The

Re: [fossil-users] Further mailing list configuration changes.

With regards to replacing the From: address but leaving the display name, that could have adverse impact on e-mail client address books and auto complete, since many email clients these days do the wrong thing and only show the display name, hiding the email address. a) How does your address

Re: [fossil-users] Further mailing list configuration changes.

> Le 30 juin 2016 à 20:47, Ron W a écrit : > > > > As for the From header, a newer version of the Mailman list manager would get > us the option to replace just the address in the From header. +1 > That would help mitigate the problem that Richard was trying to

Re: [fossil-users] Further mailing list configuration changes.

On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 11:38 AM, K. Fossil user < ticketpersonnal-fos...@yahoo.fr> wrote: > > As I said, the correct behavior should be : "reply-to" the Fossil SCM > list... > Looking at the email headers, I see "Reply-to: Fossil SCM user's discussion ", so

Re: [fossil-users] Further mailing list configuration changes.

ford <amb-sendok-1469821765.fappjflkogdfbmcmj...@bradfords.org> À : K. Fossil user <ticketpersonnal-fos...@yahoo.fr> Cc : Fossil SCM User's Discussion <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> Envoyé le : Mercredi 29 juin 2016 21h49 Objet : Re: [fossil-users] Further mailing list

Re: [fossil-users] Further mailing list configuration changes.

On Jun 28, 2016 1:54 PM, "K. Fossil user" wrote: > > Ah... > Let's play YOUR game then. > People ask for something then you ask others to follow because it seems that most people (let say : five or more?) guys speak about it ? > And of course those guys are EXPERT

Re: [fossil-users] Further mailing list configuration changes.

Ah...Let's play YOUR game then.People ask for something then you ask others to follow because it seems that most people (let say : five or more?) guys speak about it ?And of course those guys are EXPERT (or I suppose according to you or the fossil team or whoever you want) so everyone should

Re: [fossil-users] Further mailing list configuration changes.

Thus said "K. Fossil user" on Mon, 27 Jun 2016 20:10:53 -: > I don't understand why the Fossil team don't create a poll about the > Mailing list behavior people may want? Are the responses not sent to the previous thread regarding the changes sufficient? Andy -- TAI64 timestamp:

Re: [fossil-users] Further mailing list configuration changes.

 : Gour <g...@atmarama.com> À : fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org Envoyé le : Lundi 27 juin 2016 7h50 Objet : Re: [fossil-users] Further mailing list configuration changes. On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 14:05:28 +0800 Barry Arthur <barry.art...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm glad to hear that.

Re: [fossil-users] Further mailing list configuration changes.

On Jun 26, 2016 9:13 PM, "Richard Hipp" wrote: > > The "From:" removal has been turned off and in its place "Reply-To:" > removal has been turned on. This is a test message to verify the new > configuration. So is this basically how it was configured previously? Your email

Re: [fossil-users] Further mailing list configuration changes.

Thus said Richard Hipp on Mon, 27 Jun 2016 06:12:50 +0200: > Further changes might occur depending on how this one goes. What are your thoughts on some of the proposed methods for attempting to auto-unsubscribe any bots? Specifically, having a daily MOTD that is emailed to all subscribers and

Re: [fossil-users] Further mailing list configuration changes.

On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 14:05:28 +0800 Barry Arthur wrote: > I'm glad to hear that. However, we do not know the number of subscribers via Gmane - I'm the one and survived. :-) Sincerely, Gour -- Before giving up this present body, if one is able to tolerate the urges of

Re: [fossil-users] Further mailing list configuration changes.

On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 7:13 AM, Barry Arthur wrote: > Any stats on how many we lost during the blackout? 0. Net number of subscribers is unchanged. -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org ___ fossil-users mailing list

Re: [fossil-users] Further mailing list configuration changes.

Any stats on how many we lost during the blackout? On 27 June 2016 at 12:34, Scott Doctor wrote: > Yay. > > - > Scott Doctor > sc...@scottdoctor.com > > > On 06/26/2016 21:14, Steve Stefanovich wrote: > >> Works, don't touch it anymore :) >> >> Cheers,

Re: [fossil-users] Further mailing list configuration changes.

Yay. - Scott Doctor sc...@scottdoctor.com On 06/26/2016 21:14, Steve Stefanovich wrote: Works, don't touch it anymore :) Cheers, Steve --- ‎ Original Message From: Richard Hipp Sent: Monday, 27 June 2016 14:13 To: fossil-users Reply To: Fossil SCM user's discussion

Re: [fossil-users] Further mailing list configuration changes.

Works, don't touch it anymore :) Cheers, Steve --- ‎ Original Message From: Richard Hipp Sent: Monday, 27 June 2016 14:13 To: fossil-users Reply To: Fossil SCM user's discussion Subject: [fossil-users] Further mailing list configuration changes. The "From:" removal has been turned off and in