You can have a working directory for one repository nested inside a folder in a
working directory of another repository. See the —nested option for `fossil
open`.
I use this *extensively*. It’s very convenient. But it may not be quite what
you want because you do have to commit separately for
>>
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Is it possible to merge repository's?
On 5/29/2017 10:30 PM, Andy Bradford wrote:
> Thus said Stephan Beal on Tue, 30 May 2017 02:57:38 +0200:
>
>> However, there is _hypothetically_ a way to completely merge 2
repos
&
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 8:00 AM, <fossil-users-requ...@lists.fossil-scm.org>
wrote:
>
> Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 22:35:31 -0500
> From: The Tick <the.t...@gmx.com>
> Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Is it possible to merge repository's?
>
> On 5/29/2017 10:30 PM, Andy
On 05/29/2017 11:35 PM, The Tick wrote:
> On 5/29/2017 10:30 PM, Andy Bradford wrote:
>> Thus said Stephan Beal on Tue, 30 May 2017 02:57:38 +0200:
>>
>>> However, there is _hypothetically_ a way to completely merge 2 repos
>>> into one while keeping all commits, but i'm not at all certain if
Thus said The Tick on Mon, 29 May 2017 22:35:31 -0500:
> From this I gather that there would be no way to connect the imported
> repository onto the main trunk. That was not what I was hoping for.
You're correct, you would have 2 trunks.
Andy
--
TAI64 timestamp: 4000592dd034
On 5/29/2017 10:30 PM, Andy Bradford wrote:
Thus said Stephan Beal on Tue, 30 May 2017 02:57:38 +0200:
However, there is _hypothetically_ a way to completely merge 2 repos
into one while keeping all commits, but i'm not at all certain if this
would work...
I think it actually will work for
Thus said Stephan Beal on Tue, 30 May 2017 02:57:38 +0200:
> However, there is _hypothetically_ a way to completely merge 2 repos
> into one while keeping all commits, but i'm not at all certain if this
> would work...
I think it actually will work for some definition of ``work''. I've done
it
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 2:57 AM, Stephan Beal wrote:
> b) copy (recursively) the "deconstructed" files from repo 2 over the ones
> from repo 2.
>
Typo: from repo 2 to repo 1, of course.
--
- stephan beal
http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
"Freedom is sloppy.
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 2:09 AM, The Tick wrote:
> Probably a quick question: is it possible to merge one repository into
> another and retain all the commit messages? There are no common files. It
> would be really great if I could specify the root within repository #1 at
>
9 matches
Mail list logo