2009/3/8 Milos Rancic mill...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 4:46 AM, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:
For example, if the survey had shown community credit to be highly
desired and not controversial at all, that would be interesting: We
could have an informed conversation about
2009/3/8 Aphaia aph...@gmail.com:
I would like to encourage Simple English Wikipedia fans to blog about
it ... particularly if you are non-English native speakers. The wiki
is just not known. They might know their mother tongue Wikipedia and
English one but not Simplewiki.
I find it
Some options may be out of the question due to local law.
John
Erik Moeller skrev:
2009/3/7 Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com:
I'm curious, why did you include options that aren't actually
available? No credit and credit to the community are clearly not in
keeping with the license, so
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/3/8 Milos Rancic mill...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 4:46 AM, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:
For example, if the survey had shown community credit to be highly
desired and not controversial at
2009/3/8 John at Darkstar vac...@jeb.no:
One person told me that attribution of a single article and a bigger
collection could be made different. That is, a single printed copy of an
article could use a credit of Wikipedia and a mirror on a website
could use a history link. We don't have to
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.comwrote:
Crediting Wikipedia would never be acceptable under CC-by-SA, since
existing contributions weren't made under a terms of service that
required permission be granted for such attribution.
True, but would the Creative
2009/3/8 Anthony wikim...@inbox.org:
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.comwrote:
Crediting Wikipedia would never be acceptable under CC-by-SA, since
existing contributions weren't made under a terms of service that
required permission be granted for such
There has been considerable argument here has been that it ought to
be allowed. Speaking for myself, there are two I think I might be able
to mange to work in , though i wouldn't attempt to write anything
substantial for the regular versions. English speakers need
encouragement not to be
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Sue Gardner sgard...@wikimedia.org wrote:
1) There is a big unresolved question around whether, if
marginally-notable people ask to have their articles deleted, that
request should be granted. My sense -both from the discussion here
and other discussions
Erik Moeller wrote:
2009/3/7 Brian brian.min...@colorado.edu:
Ultimately it does not seem reasonable to force the printing of a URL
on non-hypertext mediums.
I still believe we ought to avoid explicit distinction between media
forms because I think these distinctions are inherently
Hello all,
Bidding is now closed for Wikimania 2010! The bidding cities are
Oxford, Amsterdam, Gdansk, and Philadelphia.
The bidding cities now have a month to complete work on their bids,
after which a public meeting will be held to answer questions and the
Jury will evaluate the bids.
Also, a
11 matches
Mail list logo
