Erik Moeller wrote:
2009/3/11 Jussi-Ville Heiskanen cimonav...@gmail.com:
3. If the intent is to maintain a stipulation that conforming
to the license can be done by satisfying a significantly
lower threshold than supplying the authors, but since we
are doing that more onerous route,
Robert Rohde wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen
cimonav...@gmail.com wrote:
Personally I can't fully agree. Where no new problems are
introduced, and old obstacles are removed, the move can
be a good thing in itself, irregardless of the ambiguities
that were
2009/3/14 Jussi-Ville Heiskanen
I think you fail at logic.
You could not have two mirrors linking to each others with
neither listing the authors, if the first one to mirror was
compliant with the CC-BY-SA. Posit the first mirror complied with
and required compliance of that license. It
2009/3/14 Jussi-Ville Heiskanen cimonav...@gmail.com:
The only thing *on* wikimedia websites that does
satisfy that currently is the history of articles; a direct
link into the history is sadly the only option available. I
think it is way cool that people are thinking of innovative
ways of
2009/3/14 David Gerard dger...@gmail.com:
2009/3/14 Jussi-Ville Heiskanen cimonav...@gmail.com:
The only thing *on* wikimedia websites that does
satisfy that currently is the history of articles; a direct
link into the history is sadly the only option available. I
think it is way cool that
2009/3/14 geni geni...@gmail.com:
2009/3/14 David Gerard dger...@gmail.com:
Here's an idea: nice URLs for the history. So we don't end up with
stupid things peppered with ? and and = printed on mugs, travel
guides, etc.
If the people producing the mugs want that they are free to produce a
Dear All,
Pray, allow me to announce the first ever international picture
competition of Wikimedia Hungary. [1]
The competition officially launching tomorrow, commemorating a
Hungarian national holiday[2], is aimed at gathering visual
representations - photographs, videos, maps, drawings, SVG
2009/3/14 David Gerard dger...@gmail.com:
2009/3/14 geni geni...@gmail.com:
2009/3/14 David Gerard dger...@gmail.com:
Here's an idea: nice URLs for the history. So we don't end up with
stupid things peppered with ? and and = printed on mugs, travel
guides, etc.
If the people producing the
David Gerard wrote:
2009/3/14 Jussi-Ville Heiskanen cimonav...@gmail.com:
The only thing *on* wikimedia websites that does
satisfy that currently is the history of articles; a direct
link into the history is sadly the only option available. I
think it is way cool that people are thinking
2009/3/15 Jussi-Ville Heiskanen cimonav...@gmail.com:
Hehe, I am way ahead of you, brother.
I've already sort of put the idea out there, discreetly,
that it would be cool if there was a url redirection service
on wikimedia servers, that would shorten the urls into
something like
I would actually be in favour of all committee members being required
to publicly reveal their real names. The licensing update (if and when
it occurs) would be major, historical event. People in charge of
supporting/facilitating/implementing the decision regarding any
license change should be
Jussi-Ville Heiskanen wrote:
Language will not bind contributors who understand they
are protected by the copyleft provisions of both GFDL and
CC-BY-SA. That just will not happen.
In the real world much of the terms of use will be just so
much arm-waving, let us be realistic.
This just
12 matches
Mail list logo
