2011/4/2 Rodan Bury bury.ro...@gmail.com:
The analysis of the qualitative and quantitative results of the Usability
Initiative is not a question anybody can answer. Comments like I personally
prefer monobook (fictional example) does not help to make an analysis based
on facts.
Erik Möller's
On 4 April 2011 16:20, Amir E. Aharoni amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il wrote:
I understand that WMF's resources are limited, but the development and
the deployment of Vector did cost some money and also forced a lot of
volunteers in English and in all other language projects to make
adjustments
Thread title?
FT2
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 4:27 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
See the current thread on wikitech-l about how chronically broken
most site JavaScript is and what to do about the problem
___
foundation-l mailing list
On 4 April 2011 16:33, FT2 ft2.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Thread title?
Focus on sister projects. Lots of the archive page as of today:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2011-April/
- d.
___
foundation-l mailing list
2011/4/4 David Gerard dger...@gmail.com
On 4 April 2011 16:20, Amir E. Aharoni amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il wrote:
I understand that WMF's resources are limited, but the development and
the deployment of Vector did cost some money and also forced a lot of
volunteers in English and in all
I'm not seeing discussion of chronically broken code there. Just
discussion of redundant code (due to 1.17) and cleanup. Any chance of a
pointer to something that sums up the chronically broken nature of site
script?
FT2
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 4:41 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On
On 4 April 2011 17:20, FT2 ft2.w...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not seeing discussion of chronically broken code there. Just
discussion of redundant code (due to 1.17) and cleanup. Any chance of a
pointer to something that sums up the chronically broken nature of site
script?
e.g.
2011/4/4 Amir E. Aharoni amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il
2011/4/4 David Gerard dger...@gmail.com
On 4 April 2011 16:20, Amir E. Aharoni amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il
wrote:
I understand that WMF's resources are limited, but the development and
the deployment of Vector did cost some
2011/4/4 Rodan Bury bury.ro...@gmail.com:
As Erik Möller said the qualitative analysis is the user testing with a few
dozens of users. This user testing was conducted several times during the
development cycle, and it was thorough. The best user testing consist of no
more than 30 users, and I
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 22:14, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:
2011/4/4 Rodan Bury bury.ro...@gmail.com:
As Erik Möller said the qualitative analysis is the user testing with a few
dozens of users. This user testing was conducted several times during the
development cycle, and it was
2011/4/4 Amir E. Aharoni amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il:
For example, in the Hebrew Wikipedia there was a Search and Replace
gadget long before the advent of Vector's Search and Replace dialog.
It was developed due to popular demand, bottom-up, by a volunteer, and
- here's the scariest part -
After a cool off period of about 48 hours and considerable
reflection, it is my conviction that the posts of two above mentioned
editors should be moderated from now on.
Andrew Garrett wrote, Sun Apr 3 10:13:26 UTC 2011, Your messages are
deliberately obnoxious, unpleasant, and off-topic to
Oh dear. In the hurly-burly of Wikipedia especially, trenchant, even strong,
language seems to be accepted from some but not from others. Some give and
take should be allowed but when a top 100 contributor is desysopped for
little else by WP's ArbCom, who knows where the limits may be? This is
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Virgilio A. P. Machado v...@fct.unl.pt wrote:
Andrew Garrett wrote, Sun Apr 3 10:13:26 UTC 2011, Your messages are
deliberately obnoxious, unpleasant, and off-topic to boot. it is
unclear what messages he is referring to, but these are not
acceptable terms to
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Virgilio A. P. Machado v...@fct.unl.pt
wrote:
Andrew Garrett wrote, Sun Apr 3 10:13:26 UTC 2011, Your messages are
deliberately obnoxious, unpleasant, and off-topic to boot.
Andrew was sticking up for you, Virgilio, not addressing that comment
at you, so that
Andrew was clearly referring to me, lets leave him out of this please.
-Dan
On Apr 4, 2011, at 8:32 PM, Virgilio A. P. Machado wrote:
After a cool off period of about 48 hours and considerable
reflection, it is my conviction that the posts of two above mentioned
editors should be moderated
Jan Kucera (Kozuch) wrote:
why is the Foundation so passive??? I have been since almost 5 years with
various Wikimedia projects and I can really see NO PROGRESS from the side of
the Foundation but more employees, 2 new blogs, new Vector skin and maybe
MediaWiki performance tweaks. My
Machado initiated this matter by posting a sarcastic message directed at
me to the effect that I was ignorant.
I'm sorry if someone has overdone it in responding to him, but the
ugliness started with him.
Fred Bauder
After a cool off period of about 48 hours and considerable
reflection, it is
Hi, folks,
When I browsed Wikipedia this morning, I found all wikimedia sites were
blocked again in China.
And several others reported blocking by their ISP also.
Recently Ai WeiWei, a famous artist and activist, were detained by the
government,
it seems that the government seized their control
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Mingli Yuan mingli.y...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, folks,
When I browsed Wikipedia this morning, I found all wikimedia sites were
blocked again in China.
And several others reported blocking by their ISP also.
Recently Ai WeiWei, a famous artist and activist, were
In nothing more then unscientific 'hand my laptop over to a friend, wait,
switch themes, wait, ask opinions', repeated with 11 guinea pigs (i mean
friends), it came out a wash. After 15 minutes in each theme, it was close
to a split. 7 said they preferred monobook, 4 vector. When asked to compare
21 matches
Mail list logo
