On 03/12/12 12:35 PM, George Herbert wrote:
Without delving into the specifics here, or concluding either way as
to the current case lacking actual evidence in front of me, it is a
real and quite serious problem if we don't hold senior and longtime
editors to account for abuses they may
On 03/09/12 9:39 PM, Andreas Kolbe wrote:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 2:16 AM, Ray Saintongesainto...@telus.net wrote:
On 03/08/12 2:20 AM, Theo10011 wrote:
The other issue is morality and responsibility. I don't think any
executives or board members should make a statement about that video.
On 03/09/12 10:00 PM, Thomas Morton wrote:
On 10 March 2012 00:57, Ray Saintongesainto...@telus.net wrote:
On 03/09/12 6:06 AM, Neil Babbage wrote:
Wikimedia is not supposed to be some kind of exercise in perfection for
perfection's sake. It's supposed to be open, accessible and useful.
Am 13.03.2012 03:39, schrieb Andreas Kolbe:
It's not me who's uploading hundreds of pornographic media onto Wikimedia
sites. There are places for porn online, just like there are places for
online poker, and amateur digital art. I have no problem with any of them.
But listen to yourself – you
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Tobias Oelgarte
tobias.oelga...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 13.03.2012 03:39, schrieb Andreas Kolbe:
No. I'm not accusing you for prudery, but for making wrong cited
statements. Your assumption is that we have to sacrifice neutrality to
please a audience that
Am 13.03.2012 10:39, schrieb Andreas Kolbe:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Tobias Oelgarte
tobias.oelga...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 13.03.2012 03:39, schrieb Andreas Kolbe:
No. I'm not accusing you for prudery, but for making wrong cited
statements. Your assumption is that we have to
2010's 32-volume set will be its last. (Now I want to get one, to
replace my old set!) Future versions will be digital only.
http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/03/13/after-244-years-encyclopaedia-britannica-stops-the-presses/?smid=tw-nytimesseid=auto
I thought they had already stopped... I'm sure I remember an
announcement like this a year or two ago... does anyone know what it
is I'm remembering?
On 13 March 2012 22:49, Samuel Klein meta...@gmail.com wrote:
2010's 32-volume set will be its last. (Now I want to get one, to
replace my old
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 22:54:48 +, Thomas Dalton
thomas.dal...@gmail.com
wrote:
I thought they had already stopped... I'm sure I remember an
announcement like this a year or two ago... does anyone know what it
is I'm remembering?
No, I think there were only like three big universal
Hello,
Thanks MZMcBride for your reply here.
On 10 Mar 2012, at 22:32, MZMcBride wrote:
Michael Peel wrote:
I'd like to see more information here. What activities are MarkMonitor
involved in with the 'anti-piracy fight'? Are they involved in filtering all
peer-to-peer traffic, or just the
2012/3/13 Samuel Klein meta...@gmail.com
Today our digital database is much larger than what we can fit in the
print set. And it is up to date because we can revise it within
minutes anytime we need to, and we do it many times each day.
Wow, they update the encyclopedia many times each day.
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Samuel Klein meta...@gmail.com wrote:
2010's 32-volume set will be its last. (Now I want to get one, to
replace my old set!) Future versions will be digital only.
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 8:22 PM, phoebe ayers phoebe.w...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Samuel Klein meta...@gmail.com wrote:
2010's 32-volume set will be its last. (Now I want to get one, to
replace my old set!) Future versions will be digital only.
I've been asked to write a short editorial about this development from
a Wikipedian's perspective and am curious about (and would love to
include) other Wikimedian experiences -- did you use print
encyclopedias as a kid? Was a love of print encyclopedias part of your
motivation or interest in
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Yaroslav M. Blanter pute...@mccme.ru wrote:
No, I think there were only like three big universal encyclopaedias still
being printed (Britannica, Brockhaus, and Russian Encyclopaedia?), unless I
am confusing things.
There's also World Book in English, the
On 14/03/12 11:22, phoebe ayers wrote:
I've been asked to write a short editorial about this development from
a Wikipedian's perspective and am curious about (and would love to
include) other Wikimedian experiences -- did you use print
encyclopedias as a kid? Was a love of print encyclopedias
On 13 March 2012 20:22, phoebe ayers phoebe.w...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been asked to write a short editorial about this development from
a Wikipedian's perspective and am curious about (and would love to
include) other Wikimedian experiences -- did you use print
encyclopedias as a kid? Was a
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 7:22 PM, phoebe ayers phoebe.w...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been asked to write a short editorial about this development from
a Wikipedian's perspective and am curious about (and would love to
include) other Wikimedian experiences -- did you use print
encyclopedias as a
My answers to Phoebe questions. (I tryed to keep it short to not create a
lot of problems to read, if you need a bigger version you can ask me) :)
*I've been asked to write a short editorial about this development from a
Wikipedian's perspective and am curious about (and would love to
19 matches
Mail list logo
