On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 4:14 AM, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:
We currently have this public list for Wikimedia Foundation matters,
as well as a private list called internal-l which in practice is in
large part used for WMF/chapters discussions, because chapter board
members are added
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Stuart West stuw...@gmail.com wrote:
The hope was to attract/identify Board candidates who could add a lot of
value to the movement but who, for one reason or another, would NOT typically
be candidates in election. That might be because they aren't well-known
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Robin McCain ro...@slmr.com wrote:
I've just been subjected to a rather bizarre bunch of activity by
Mythpage88, who seems anxious to delete everything I've written over the
years in WP on the basis that it isn't notable.
It looks like he nominated one article
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Mathias Schindler
mathias.schind...@gmail.com wrote:
Then can you specify the threshold for the community-ratio that is in
your opinion required for some Wikipedians to vandalize a language
edition of Wikipedia in such way?
Unless the WMF decides it should
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com wrote:
Don't forget that we do already have routes onto the board
(chapter selected and expert seats) other than the elections for
precisely the reason that the elections don't necessary get the
breadth the board needs.
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 6:50 AM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
So, the payoffs could be ridiculously huge: eight times the number of
smart and knowledgeable people even being able to *fix typos* on
material they care about.
Jan Paul Posma's inline editor seems pretty promising. It's
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Benjamin Lees emufarm...@gmail.com wrote:
I admit I haven't been following the fundraiser process very
carefully, but is there any place where people can see and comment on
fundraising banners before they go live? I've only been able to find
such a page
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Domas Mituzas midom.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Logs cannot be read by wikipedia owners or us government because they don't
exist.
There aren't any raw logs?
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 2:30 PM, wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
Each web server, of which the WMF has a few,
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Gerard Meijssen
gerard.meijs...@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi,
It does not work for me. The poll that is.. The ban of Mr Kohs works for me.
Thanks,
GerardM
Pressing Enter doesn't work as you'd expect on that site (it seems
to activate the Sign In button, rather
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.comwrote:
On 24 June 2010 15:04, Ziko van Dijk zvand...@googlemail.com wrote:
- Scope and name: Maybe it would practically make no big difference
whether the project is called simple or for kids. Poor readers and
adult
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 6:55 PM, Aryeh Gregor
simetrical+wikil...@gmail.comsimetrical%2bwikil...@gmail.com
wrote:
2) Make sure that every paid developer spends time dealing with the
community. This can include giving support to end users, discussing
things with volunteers, reviewing patches,
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Amory Meltzer amorymelt...@gmail.comwrote:
This is nuts. Literally, nothing has changed. Stuff on Wikimedia
sites needs to be either educational or aimed at furthering the goals
of the project and the foundation. We don't host articles about my
her breasts
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 4:33 PM, George Herbert george.herb...@gmail.comwrote:
There has been no organized or widespread attempt to either ask Jimmy
to give it up or to take it away. I can name a number of individuals
who assert that should happen, but there's no poll, no project, no
policy
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:32 AM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen
cimonav...@gmail.com wrote:
Anthony wrote:
August 2009: 1030
September 2009: 791
October 2009: 326
November 2009: 513
December 2009: 234
January 2010: 207
February 2010: 213
March 2010: ???
And your point.
Are you
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Teofilo teofilow...@gmail.com wrote:
How about moving the servers (5) from Florida to a cold country
(Alaska, Canada, Finland, Russia) so that they can be used to heat
offices or homes ? It might not be unrealistic as one may read such
things as the solution
. It states *This policy may **not be circumvented, eroded, or
ignored on local Wikimedia projects.*
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Benjamin Lees emufarm...@gmail.com
wrote:
I don't think the non discrimination policy should be construed to apply
to
the communities: the policy says
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
I propose the foundation-announce-l mailing list be set up with the
following posting rules:
1) One post per person per thread. That includes the initiator of the
thread.
That's not how announcement lists work. The whole
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Sue Gardner sgard...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Report to the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees
Covering: April 2009
Prepared by:Sue Gardner, Executive Director, Wikimedia
Foundation
Prepared for: Wikimedia Foundation Board of
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Brion Vibber br...@wikimedia.org wrote:
With the increase in administrative and organizational duties, I've been
less and less able to devote time to the part of the job that's nearest
and dearest to me: working with our volunteer developer community and
end
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:59 PM, private musings thepmacco...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi all,
Just wondering what folk think about the WMF heading towards compliance
with
things like this;
http://www.gsmeurope.org/documents/eu_codes/fsm_code_en.pdf
This is a german code of conduct - but there are
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 9:19 PM, Brian brian.min...@colorado.edu wrote:
Sorry, where I said AbuseFilter I meant to say FlaggedRevisions. I'm not
sure on how AbuseFilter came to be agreed on.
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 7:15 PM, Brian brian.min...@colorado.edu wrote:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 6:59
21 matches
Mail list logo
