I don't know if this makes sense, so I beg your patience for my ignorance.
But would it be an option to duplicate the archive? Then both the old and
the new links will work. It would be a Great Pity if the new list would not
contain the archive of the old list.
Best,
Lodewijk
No dia 4 de Abril
:)
Best,
Lodewijk
No dia 4 de Abril de 2012 05:53, Pharos pharosofalexand...@gmail.comescreveu:
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Samuel Klein sjkl...@hcs.harvard.edu
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:38 AM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 April 2012 07:47, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow
And if memory serves me well 2007 was co-hosted by the Academica Sinica and
2008 by the Bibliotheca Alexandrina (which probably can be categorized
as academic albeit not university).
Kind regards,
Lodewijk
No dia 26 de Março de 2012 11:04, Ray Saintonge sainto...@telus.netescreveu:
On 03/25/12
would be delighted to help you out in any
way possible to pull off this event.
Best,
Lodewijk
(on behalf of the international coordinating team)
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman
clause to make things complicated). That way everyone with permission of
the WMF can reuse the design if wanted.
Lodewijk
No dia 5 de Março de 2012 15:54, Richard Symonds
richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.uk escreveu:
Silly question for you all:
Is
http://commons.wikimedia.org/**wiki
eating the cake would damage the moral rights of the logo author. Since he
cannot give general permission to violate moral rights, eating the cake
would be illegal.
No dia 5 de Março de 2012 23:08, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com escreveu:
On 5 March 2012 22:07, geni geni...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Castelo,
just to make the discussion clearer: could you just give say 5 or 10
examples of topics where you believe oral citations are unavoidable? Then I
hope that Ziko in his turn can explain how we can write about those
examples without using them.
Best regards,
Lodewijk
No dia 25 de
learning
process all over again.
So yes, lets be critical, and constructive as much as possible.
best,
Lodewijk
No dia 14 de Fevereiro de 2012 00:57, Ziko van Dijk
vand...@wmnederland.nlescreveu:
Hello,
I am afraid that the letter takes over the results of the MR group
that where presented
its
impact rather than its source.
Best,
Lodewijk
No dia 14 de Fevereiro de 2012 14:23, Ziko van Dijk
vand...@wmnederland.nlescreveu:
Lodewijk,
I remember the session in Haifa very well. The audience found it
extremely difficult to understand the texts and do anything with them
- think
not work in their case.
Warmly,
Lodewijk
No dia 13 de Fevereiro de 2012 15:29, marcos tal_t...@yahoo.es escreveu:
There is a simpler solution: to dissolve the current structure of chapters
and to leave everything in hands of the magnificent professionals of San
Francisco...
Marcos Tallés (aka
it to become. I can't suggest
changes to team or actions if I am unable to grasp behind the very broadly
stated goals. Right now it is clear who is in the team, but honestly I
don't know you guys well enough to derive from that what you should be
doing.
Lodewijk
No dia 10 de Fevereiro de 2012 08:54, Philippe
no decision
would be made, but rather an inventory, which would allow for a real life
discussion in Paris/Berlin with other stakeholders.
Lodewijk
No dia 9 de Fevereiro de 2012 09:11, Ting Chen tc...@wikimedia.orgescreveu:
The Board approves the following letter to be sent to the community:
Dear
Foundation? Will you be working on guiding the community involvement
processes Geoff handled so well with the Terms of Use?
Thanks,
Lodewijk
No dia 10 de Fevereiro de 2012 07:46, Theo10011 de10...@gmail.comescreveu:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb
,
Lodewijk
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
,
Lodewijk
No dia 1 de Fevereiro de 2012 17:32, Andrea Zanni
zanni.andre...@gmail.comescreveu:
I don't know if it's the case,
but it would be very interesting to have the Foundation
support officialy the campaign (single scholars can do decide to boycott,
of course).
But universal access to universal
Apparently the ambassador of the Netherlands did not get permission in time
to sign the agreement. It seems nobody really knows yet why that was, but
it is expected that the signature will follow. Also the signature of Spain,
Slovenia and Cyprus seems to be missing yet. Source:
Hi Ziko,
I appreciate your email, but it seems you forgot the link. Also, I
personally strongly prefer it if you could include the actual reports in
the email. It makes searching finding much easier, as well as offline
reading.
Best regards,
Lodewijk
No dia 22 de Janeiro de 2012 22:32, Ziko
This is just cruel... read the rest yeah right :P
-- Mensagem encaminhada --
De: English Wikipedia Article of the Day
daily-articl...@lists.wikimedia.org
Data: 18 de Janeiro de 2012 01:05
Assunto: [Daily article] January 18: Nick Drake
Para: daily-articl...@lists.wikimedia.org
as explained in another email: it was actually sent today, with the wrong
datestamp.
L
No dia 18 de Janeiro de 2012 16:35, Huib Laurens sterke...@gmail.comescreveu:
gmail is having troubles the last few weeks... I miss e-mails daily that
arrive much later...
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 2:43 PM,
We should be careful to start calling all copyright related laws evil (at
least you seem to suggest that) because then that would devaluate very
quickly. At least what I see quickly (but IANALawyer and IANASpaniard) this
law is not thát evil: the government can ask to close a website that is
Hi Jürgen,
I didn't mean to specify a format, but rather how I would like to use it.
If the same can be achieved in a way that is also open source etc (an can
be used on multiple platforms) that deserved of course preference. Hence
the some kind of :)
Best,
Lodewijk
No dia 22 de Dezembro de
Hi Steven,
is there some kind of Google Agenda of this type of meetings that I could
load into my own? Then I could use that as a reminder as well.
Best,
Lodewijk
No dia 22 de Dezembro de 2011 00:29, Steven Walling
swall...@wikimedia.orgescreveu:
This is happening in about 30 minutes
, it has mainly been a set of questions
which have gotten answered in many different ways throughout this
discussion. That alone leaves me to believe that there are ways to improve.
Best regards,
Lodewijk
No dia 16 de Novembro de 2011 04:08, Bishakha Datta bishakhada...@gmail.com
escreveu:
Dear Hari
practices and the
coolest ideas * Whether physical or online methods are used primarily Thank
you for your help! Lodewijk
ps: oh yes, of course: you can share this with everybody you like. I hope
someone can send this to the chapters-l especially
,
Lodewijk
No dia Sábado, 12 de Novembro de 2011, Liam Wyattliamwyatt@gmail.comescreveu:
On 12 November 2011 06:53, Bishakha Datta bishakhada...@gmail.com wrote:
This thread started out with questions about the legal and practical
differences between chapter and trust, but has veered much more
and the trust be competing with each other or collaborating?
Thanks for helping me seeing the situation more clearly,
Lodewijk
No dia 11 de Novembro de 2011 09:29, Gautam John gkj...@gmail.comescreveu:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Liam Wyatt liamwy...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you elaborate
I don't, and if you disagree, you are trolling and I'll block you!
Lodewijk
No dia 2 de Novembro de 2011 21:52, Kim Bruning
k...@bruning.xs4all.nlescreveu:
In reference to people wanting to be nicer to newbies, (and next to the
obvious step of us really needing
to make it more frelling
at this moment,
and it could change every day/week.
Best,
Lodewijk
No dia 24 de Outubro de 2011 09:04, Till Mletzko
till.mlet...@wikimedia.deescreveu:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Fundraising_2011#When_does_the_fundraiser_start.3F
Best,
Till
Am 19.10.2011 20:01, schrieb Chris
Hi Charles, all,
maybe I'm missing it - but I don't seem to be able to find an actual
timeline (or planned timeline) for this year's fundraiser. Could you please
point me to it? Thanks a lot,
Lodewijk
No dia 18 de Outubro de 2011 22:45, Charles A. Barr
cb...@wikimedia.orgescreveu:
The global
Why is it that after reading such a message, I only get more curious who
this actress is ;)
No dia 19 de Outubro de 2011 14:49, Yaroslav M. Blanter
pute...@mccme.ruescreveu:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:40:18 +0100, Thomas Dalton
thomas.dal...@gmail.com
wrote:
the random article button?
Best,
lodewijk
No dia 18 de Outubro de 2011 16:00, Fae f...@wikimedia.org.uk escreveu:
Rather than filtering the unreferenced, I had in mind articles such as
[[Human penis]] and [[Vagina]] where the lead may be NSFW (Tom's main
thrust) or unstable articles
of
the proposed law for a long time before.
it's not that I dont trust you - but several people have asked me for such
opinions. Is there somewhere an overview of legal experts interpreting
this?
Lodewijk
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l
point, so perhaps another statement by someone else clarifies better.
Thanks a lot,
Lodewijk
No dia 6 de Outubro de 2011 15:20, Federico Leva (Nemo)
nemow...@gmail.comescreveu:
Lodewijk, 06/10/2011 14:24:
No dia 6 de Outubro de 2011 14:01, Federico Leva (Nemo)
escreveu:
This doesn't mean
The WIki is back online already. But the village pump page was (at least for
the last day) available.
Lodewijk
No dia 6 de Outubro de 2011 18:17, teun spaans teun.spa...@gmail.comescreveu:
As I understand, the change has only been proposed.
Possibly another interesting issue will develop
If you even think that is a comparable situation, then you clearly don't
understand at all what this law is all about.
Lodewijk
No dia 5 de Outubro de 2011 09:39, emijrp emi...@gmail.com escreveu:
The Wikimedia Foundation supports the rights of all people to access our
free knowledge content
parks here.
Lodewijk
No dia 5 de Outubro de 2011 10:53, Thomas Morton
morton.tho...@googlemail.com escreveu:
On 5 October 2011 09:26, Jalo jal...@gmail.com wrote:
If you don't even think that is a comparable situation, then you
clearly
don't understand at all what some people think
, for all those foreigners who might be visiting
it.wikipedia as well.
An alternative could be to use a really huge sitenotice, so that people are
forced to scroll down a lot every time - which is very frustrating, but
doesn't deprive you of the actual contents.
Best,
Lodewijk
No dia 4 de Outubro de
The WMF has not taken a stance even at this - individuals at the WMF did,
and the WMF did decide so far that it will not break the strike. That is
something else than the WMF taking an active stance. Which it maybe should,
maybe shouldn't (that depends on the wordings etc).
Lodewijk
No dia 5 de
'
actually want and/or need...
Lodewijk
No dia 30 de Setembro de 2011 11:40, Béria Lima berial...@gmail.comescreveu:
I'll go by pieces in your mail Erik.
*The intro and footer of Sue's post say: The purpose of this post is not
to
talk specifically about the referendum results or the image hiding
, categorization of images will be happening likely on Commons (my
guess) - so even if you opt out as German Wikipedia (although personally I
think it would be more interesting to do a reader survey inside the German
langauge visitors before deciding on that) it would not help that specific
scenario.
Lodewijk
Yes, there is (thanks Béria for linking) - however I think I speak for many
on that list that it would be appreciated if you can hold off the more
general 2012 discussions until October :) Just to state the obvious.
Best regards,
Lodewijk
Am 13. September 2011 12:28 schrieb Béria Lima berial
changes for some, and make them work - I do hope though
that both communities will quickly figure out what methods work best, and
join together again to make it more likely to pass this threshold of
activity.
Lodewijk
___
foundation-l mailing list
bylaws (which is what is defining the entity) explicitely state
the legal name, even in the link. There is no confusion possible therefore,
also from a very formal point of view.
Best regards,
Lodewijk
Am 13. September 2011 15:17 schrieb Béria Lima berial...@gmail.com:
Tomasz,
Some chapters use
for next years in our post-mortem after September.
Best regards,
Lodewijk
Am 12. September 2011 07:49 schrieb Yaroslav M. Blanter pute...@mccme.ru:
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 10:51:33 +0900, KIZU Naoko aph...@gmail.com wrote:
Off topic alert:
I haven't given a closer look to your main topic, Milos
on Commons, but most likely unused,
because the monument is not clearly identified etc.
Anyway, lets have this discussion more in depth later on, after we can see
some more clearly the final results of the 2011 edition in all countries.
Best regards,
Lodewijk
:)
Thanks,
Lodewijk
Am 12. September 2011 19:27 schrieb phoebe ayers phoebe.w...@gmail.com:
FYI: the minutes from the August 3rd, 2011 Board meeting in Haifa (the
Wikimania meeting) are now posted:
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Minutes/2011-08-03
Regards,
Phoebe Ayers
p.s. Digression
Hi,
just to be clear: was this submitted /on behalf/ of the wmf? or as a
community effort?
lodewijk
Am 9. September 2011 22:44 schrieb Daniel Mietchen
daniel.mietc...@googlemail.com:
The Wikimedia response has been submitted, based on
http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title
for bias.
You could even argue that forcing people to look at pictures and make them
feel uncomfortable gives them in their specific interpretation a larger bias
about the topic than you can ever induce by leaving the pictures out for
that same group.
Lodewijk
Am 7. September 2011 20:38 schrieb Kim
clearly said yes.
Lodewijk
Am 6. September 2011 22:45 schrieb Béria Lima berial...@gmail.com:
*My boss (...) can't open the pregnancy article at work because the intro
is NSFW our workplace.
*
I'm sorry but i don't find the problem in this article.
*I can't open the [[vagina]] article
want to?
The board clearly answered that question with yes. Do you think it is better
to force people to choose between watching an article with an image they do
not want to see, and not seeing the article at all?
Lodewijk
Am 6. September 2011 16:44 schrieb Dan Rosenthal swatjes...@gmail.com
excited about it for example, others
might be). Let us focus on having a good implementation rather than the
things that (whether we like it or not) already seem to have been decided
for us.
Lodewijk
Am 5. September 2011 18:00 schrieb Andre Engels andreeng...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 5
Hi all,
Several of you may have noted Wiki Loves Monuments - you can also find an
article about it in the Signpost of this week. Please find below our
International press release.
Best,
Lodewijk
*
*
*== PRESS RELEASE ==*
*
*
*Wikimedians team up to make European Cultural Heritage Accessible
2011/8/30 Ray Saintonge sainto...@telus.net
On 08/29/11 1:55 AM, Lodewijk wrote:
It may be a logical consequence for the WMF giving out these grants (I
don't
know but wouldn't be surprised if i.e. Ford Foundation has similar
requirements), but it clearly is a nasty side effect
). Is the reason really
transparency? Is it about transferring money? Because that is important, but
(sometimes easily) fixable. Or is the reasoning you don't like the projects
the chapters work on? Because *then* we should have a discussion about that,
and not hide behind non-reasons.
Lodewijk
2011/8
wikilovesmonuments.org (registered by WMDE) but
didn't register the .com - we had to draw a line somewhere.
For a possible intercontinental contest, we would have to rely on the .org
domain.
Lodewijk
2011/8/26 billy joel billyonl...@hotmail.nl
Yes, I understood that.
But I think its kind of stupid
.
The only truely non-neutral part could be where we suggest which categories
someone might want to hide. Or packages of categories.
Lodewijk
2011/8/26 Kim Bruning k...@bruning.xs4all.nl
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 01:25:32PM +0530, Bishakha Datta wrote:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 6:45 AM, David Goodman
. That organization is more likely to
develop itself professionally.
That does not leave out that there are many problems with the current
distribution system (50/50 etc) but that is a whole other discussion.
Lodewijk
2011/8/11 Jimmy Wales jwa...@wikia-inc.com
On 8/10/11 8:51 PM, birgitte
Maybe we could catch this discussion on wiki - it is an ever returning
issue, and the lessons could be valuable for other campaigns too.
Lodewijk
2011/8/20 Milos Rancic mill...@gmail.com
(It seems that mail server is not functioning properly. I've got
local delivery failed. Trying again
Of course there's the infamous @wikipedia_mk and @itwikiquote :)
2011/8/18 Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
On 18 August 2011 17:39, Tom Morris t...@tommorris.org wrote:
More useful for smaller wikis. Tweeting new pages or recent changes
for enwiki would probably destroy Twitter very
,
Lodewijk
2011/8/17 Teofilo teofilow...@gmail.com
Wikimedia chapters are not only an example of what should not be seen
in Wikimedia projects (an institution[...], of any kind, [...]
claiming to represent [...] individuals [1]) they also absorb funds
and hire people, pushing with more weight the goal
and will try even harder - but that won't be good
enough.
Lodewijk
-- Forwarded message --
From: Dan Rosenthal swatjes...@gmail.com
Date: 2011/8/11
Subject: Re: [Internal-l] Board letter about fundraising and chapters
To: Local Chapters, board and officers coordination (closed
any presentation format
(.ppt, .pptx, .odp) so the layers within the slides are not visible. If you
would like to see those too, just email me offlist and I'll send you the
.odp
I would like to encourage people to make any derivatives from it they think
interesting.
With kind regards,
Lodewijk
it similarly good. But that is the idea of a chapter
- it is not a fanclub organizing beer events only to have fun.
Best regards,
Lodewijk
2011/8/9 Yaroslav M. Blanter pute...@mccme.ru
On Tue, 9 Aug 2011 10:11:49 -0500, birgitte...@yahoo.com wrote:
And just to add to the argument, the projects
the privacy policy, the
Ombudsman commission should be the right way to go.
This list might be a proper forum if you identify that the ombudsman
commission does not function at all though, but as I understand it, you have
not yet explored the options there.
With kind regards,
Lodewijk
2011/7/19 Huib
consider this to be similar to Wikimedian groups who want to have
a slightly more formal relationship with the Movement?
Lodewijk
2011/7/13 Samuel Klein meta...@gmail.com
We're discussing setting up an Affiliation committee to oversee
simple, low-overhead wikimedia affiliates and associations
I assume you mean Argentinian chapter, and not arabic?
Best,
Lodewijk
2011/7/12 Milos Rancic mill...@gmail.com
We've got four new wikis: two for content and two for chapters:
* Mingrelian Wikipedia: http://xmf.wikipedia.org
* Argentinian Wikiveristy: http://ar.wikiversity.org
* Arabic
Sure it would reduce the amount of private data considered, but also the
nameaddress could (should) be considered private, and hence it wouldn't
take away the fundamental concerns as they are stated by several people.
Best,
Lodewijk
2011/7/12 Birgitte SB birgitte...@yahoo.com
A notarized
I am not sure if that would solve any of the problems that some people have
with the current situation. Still the notarized statement (which includes
all personal data) would end up with an individual if I understand
correctly. It would only add quite a lot of costs...
2011/7/11 Peter Gervai
be, that
people who currently can choose to use this clause, would simply be blocked
forever without a way of getting unblocked.
Still not taking any stand or opinion,
Lodewijk
2011/7/10 David Gerard dger...@gmail.com
On 10 July 2011 10:55, Huib Laurens sterke...@gmail.com wrote:
Is mentioned
is
active on OTRS too, but it was explicitely chosen to make this a snail mail
process.
Just to state it once again: I do not intend to take *any* position on this,
but rather to explain the facts as I understand them.
With kind regards,
Lodewijk
2011/7/9 Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com
David
Perhaps one of the list admins could at least build in a filter for the
linked in emails :) Possibly file a request with LinkedIn for change of the
account details too?
Best,
Lodewijk
2011/6/28 Mohamed Ibrahim mido.archit...@gmail.com
basically, how can someone register on linkedIn
was there on the board at the time could clarify?
Thanks a lot,
Lodewijk
2011/6/25 Milos Rancic mill...@gmail.com
On 06/24/2011 07:57 PM, birgitte...@yahoo.com wrote:
I also sat on NomCom during this time period. I cannot agree that Matt's
appointment was more problematic than Stu's or Jan-Bart
-person-call). Also, I do not understand why the *language* committee has
a role in this in the first place. Is closing projects often about whether
or not it actually is a language (the expertise field of langcom)?
Lodewijk
2011/6/25 Milos Rancic mill...@gmail.com
Board has decided to make Closing
2011/6/25 Milos Rancic mill...@gmail.com
On 06/25/2011 11:20 AM, Lodewijk wrote:
could someone perhaps explain why the board delegated closing policy to
*individual language committee members*? Because as I read it, this
advice
to the board is given by one individual, even if the rest
,
Lodewijk
2011/6/24 Milos Rancic mill...@gmail.com
On 06/24/2011 11:40 AM, Ray Saintonge wrote:
On 06/22/11 1:46 PM, Milos Rancic wrote:
I have a friendly advice for you (and I hope that Michael and Gerard
wouldn't kill me because of that): If you are able to create really
valid community
much work that would be. Maybe
someone with a better technical background and insight in what already
exists (maybe other parties have developed something similar?) can give a
fair estimate on that.
Best,
Lodewijk
2011/6/24 Milos Rancic mill...@gmail.com
On 06/24/2011 01:42 PM, Lodewijk wrote
Thank you for sharing! This potentially has a big impact indeed, and the
support of the WMF seems more than appropriate.
Is this something the WMF will do more often in the future (or has done in
the past) or is this an extreme exception due to its importance?
With kind regards,
Lodewijk
2011
in simple language?
Best regards,
Lodewijk
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
routes and explanations
to allow our communities the creation of such wonderful projects.
Best regards,
Lodewijk
2011/6/21 Milos Rancic mill...@gmail.com
On 06/21/2011 12:25 AM, MZMcBride wrote:
Thanks for the detailed response. :-)
Milos Rancic wrote:
As usual, discussion would be held
people answering your question.
Best,
Lodewijk
2011/6/17 Strainu strain...@gmail.com
2011/6/17 Strainu strain...@gmail.com:
Think about a CC-BY-NC-ND wiki. Theoretically, one
could only add content to that wiki, not edit what has already been
written.
Actually, I'm not even sure you
://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Board_elections/2011#Email
Best regards,
Lodewijk
2011/6/10 Strainu strain...@gmail.com
I think the system did NOT work for you :) It seems strange to send
the same email in several languages. I only received it in Romanian. I
think this is taken based on your language
2011/6/10 Andrew Garrett agarr...@wikimedia.org
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Amir E. Aharoni
amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il wrote:
There are several technical issues with it:
1. I already voted. It may be a good idea to send this only to people
who didn't.
I don't think this is
, but also because they simply devaluate.
Lodewijk
2011/5/19 church.of.emacs.ml church.of.emacs...@googlemail.com
Hi all,
Do we have any guidelines limiting the use of CentralNotices? I noticed
there are a lot lately (fundraising, wikimania and most recently board
elections and commons POTY), some
for long times
about unimportant thinks around the color of the bikeshed, and I think one
of your helps has been that you have been able to keep thát to a minimum.
With kind regards,
Lodewijk
2011/5/19 Sean Whitton s...@silentflame.com
I’m not a very active Wikimedian at the moment (though hopefully
Maybe I should rephrase that into a way to redirect nicely to... because
with the current layout I would not be very tempted to use it since it
suggests one made an error. (maybe with good reason, but still)
Lodewijk
2011/5/17 Casey Brown li...@caseybrown.org
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 9:24 AM
someone finds a way to redirect en.wikipedia.org/Example to
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Example .
Best,
Lodewijk
2011/5/11 Neil Harris n...@tonal.clara.co.uk
On 11/05/11 11:32, HW wrote:
I think the advantage is that it would allow us to generalize the concept
behind enwp.org, which is that we
I'm not sure... is this supposed to be a real email or does everybody see a
random string of characters?
Lodewijk
2011/4/27 widiyanto jokarwilis2...@gmail.com
jokarwilis2...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 01:52:57 +
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1252
MIME-Version: 1.0
.
Lodewijk
2011/4/3 Sarah slimvir...@gmail.com
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 11:51, Isabell Long isabell...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 06:33:32PM +0100, Phil Nash wrote:
We've not had SUL (Single User Login) for that long, and my impression
is
that this will tend to inflate the number
This is already somewhat outdated - at least 2009. I wonder how it would
look like nowadays.
Lodewijk
2011/3/31 David Richfield davidrichfi...@gmail.com
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 7:42 AM, teun spaans teun.spa...@gmail.com
wrote:
If i interpret the link correctly, these are only featured
I did a preliminary measure, and it actually showed a decline, starting the
exact week it was implemented on nlwiki :( However, this preliminary measure
was unscientific, not precise and would need better testing/measuring.
Lodewijk
2011/3/31 Amir E. Aharoni amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il
Wow Adrienne,
thanks a lot for the helpful overview. It is very enlighting for
understanding what WMFR has been doing!
Best,
Lodewijk
2011/3/23 Adrienne Alix adrienne.a...@gmail.com
Dear Chapters,
Please find below the chapter report of Wikimédia France for July, August,
September
to understand you ;-)
Lodewijk
2011/3/15 dex2...@pc.dk:
Fra: Milos Rancic mill...@gmail.com
Til: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Dato: Tir, 15. mar 2011 04:19
Emne: Re: [Foundation-l] multilingual mailing list
2011/3/14 Lodewijk lodew...@effeietsanders.org
enige lastige van meertalige lijsten is dat spelfouten ineens veel
grotere consequenties hebben.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Lodewijk
2011/3/12 Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com:
On 12 March 2011 14:53, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com wrote:
A really (and not only formally
Mi ne havas kontraŭstaron pri Esperanto en ĉi tiu specifa temo. Bedaŭrinde
mankas Google traduki en ĉi tiu lingvo!
2011/3/9 Domas Mituzas midom.li...@gmail.com
if this is true, then we should
implement a better solution for foundation-level discussions in other
major language families.
I
?
Thanks!
Lodewijk
2011/3/8 J. G. Góngora ganasto...@hotmail.com
Dear fellows,
The following message is just to keep you informed about the activities
developed during the last three months by Amical.
Kind regards,
J. Gustavo Góngora
(As a member of Amical)
*
Courses and conferences
chatting and talking with current and former board members and
exchanging information and experiences.
Best,
Lodewijk
2011/3/5 Juan de Vojníkov juandevojni...@gmail.com
Hey Lodewijk,
it is interesting, I haven't red about Wiki Loves Monuments yet so I hope,
I'll get it in Wroclaw!
I would
people - you can't run for the board without
giving that up either, for example. But to make that decision you would need
more information.
Lodewijk
2011/2/26 Pronoein prono...@gmail.com
Hello,
I'm wondering one thing about this new policy applied with some haste,
but I could'nt find
regards,
Lodewijk
2011/2/25 Birgitte SB birgitte...@yahoo.com
I was looking for something unrelated in the archives and came across an
email
[1] that I believe people might find informative wrt to the Identification
Policy which I believe has had discussion tabled for the moment. It seems
a
good candidate from a region you feel is underrepresented, just put them in
touch with Gerard and I'm confident they will be able to at least
incorporate the knowledge.
Best regards,
Lodewijk
2011/2/24 M. Williamson node...@gmail.com
To me, this is still a problem. If the committee never made any
reaction to such a
strong imbalance (and it is a very strong one) is not to say Well, we
will be happy to have them if they ever want to join but to say We
recognize that this is an issue and we will actively recruit people to
try to rectify it.
2011/2/24, Lodewijk lodew...@effeietsanders.org
1 - 100 of 157 matches
Mail list logo
