://pl.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Polimerek
http://www.ganicz.pl/poli/
http://www.cbmm.lodz.pl/work.php?id=29title=tomasz-ganicz
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
Ganicz
http://pl.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Polimerek
http://www.ganicz.pl/poli/
http://www.cbmm.lodz.pl/work.php?id=29title=tomasz-ganicz
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo
://pl.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Polimerek
http://www.ganicz.pl/poli/
http://www.cbmm.lodz.pl/work.php?id=29title=tomasz-ganicz
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation
2012/1/25 Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com:
Tomasz Ganicz, 25/01/2012 09:22:
I don't know if there is manpower for this - but it would be great if
the analysis covers also impact of ACTA on EU law and EU related
Wikipedias (those which have majority of editors from EU countries
/User:Polimerek
http://www.ganicz.pl/poli/
http://www.cbmm.lodz.pl/work.php?id=29title=tomasz-ganicz
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
?id=29title=tomasz-ganicz
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
http://pl.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Polimerek
http://www.ganicz.pl/poli/
http://www.cbmm.lodz.pl/work.php?id=29title=tomasz-ganicz
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo
://www.cbmm.lodz.pl/work.php?id=29title=tomasz-ganicz
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
?
--
Tomek Polimerek Ganicz
http://pl.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Polimerek
http://www.ganicz.pl/poli/
http://www.cbmm.lodz.pl/work.php?id=29title=tomasz-ganicz
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https
lawyer or at least revised and accepted. Otherwise the translated text
is worth nothing from legal POV.
--
Tomek Polimerek Ganicz
http://pl.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Polimerek
http://www.ganicz.pl/poli/
http://www.cbmm.lodz.pl/work.php?id=29title=tomasz-ganicz
that translation.
--
Tomek Polimerek Ganicz
http://pl.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Polimerek
http://www.ganicz.pl/poli/
http://www.cbmm.lodz.pl/work.php?id=29title=tomasz-ganicz
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https
-fide
lawyer who does this job. I guess SwisCC chapter has such a lawyer or
lawyers as well and I guess they might help...
--
Tomek Polimerek Ganicz
http://pl.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Polimerek
http://www.ganicz.pl/poli/
http://www.cbmm.lodz.pl/work.php?id=29title=tomasz-ganicz
/User:Polimerek
http://www.ganicz.pl/poli/
http://www.cbmm.lodz.pl/work.php?id=29title=tomasz-ganicz
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
/
should go on the discuss pages, but category discuss pages don't attract
much attention.
[cut]
--
Tomek Polimerek Ganicz
http://pl.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Polimerek
http://www.ganicz.pl/poli/
http://www.cbmm.lodz.pl/work.php?id=29title=tomasz-ganicz
/User:Polimerek
http://www.ganicz.pl/poli/
http://www.cbmm.lodz.pl/work.php?id=29title=tomasz-ganicz
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
in India.
--
Tomek Polimerek Ganicz
http://pl.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Polimerek
http://www.ganicz.pl/poli/
http://www.cbmm.lodz.pl/work.php?id=29title=tomasz-ganicz
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https
://www.ganicz.pl/poli/
http://www.cbmm.lodz.pl/work.php?id=29title=tomasz-ganicz
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
...
--
Tomek Polimerek Ganicz
http://pl.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Polimerek
http://www.ganicz.pl/poli/
http://www.cbmm.lodz.pl/work.php?id=29title=tomasz-ganicz
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org
.
--
Tomek Polimerek Ganicz
http://pl.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Polimerek
http://www.ganicz.pl/poli/
http://www.cbmm.lodz.pl/work.php?id=29title=tomasz-ganicz
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https
2010/11/17 Ziko van Dijk zvand...@googlemail.com:
According to the statistics only 0.2% of the page views in Germany go
to Wikipedia in Turkish, by the way.Turks in Germany belong largely to
social classes that tend not to read much in an encyclopedia, and when
they need one for school, they
2010/11/12 John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 8:13 PM, Gerard Meijssen
gerard.meijs...@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi,
Providing help to an organisation that can be considered part of the
Wikimedia movement makes sense. The issue with Citizendium is that they
explicitly distance
2010/11/12 John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 9:03 PM, Tomasz Ganicz polime...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/11/12 John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 8:13 PM, Gerard Meijssen
gerard.meijs...@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi,
Providing help to an organisation
2010/9/22 Risker risker...@gmail.com:
On 22 September 2010 04:27, Andre Engels andreeng...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Lennart Guldbrandsson
wikihanni...@gmail.com wrote:
Did you know that less than a third of the users who create an account on
English Wikipedia make
Yesha Council prapares to war on Wikipedia?
See:
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/the-right-s-latest-weapon-zionist-editing-on-wikipedia-1.308667
any comments?
Anyway, I checked the entry Jewish family in English Wikipedia and
it is just a redir to Judaism which is IMHO (at least at
2010/7/31 Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com:
On 31 July 2010 16:27, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31 July 2010 16:21, Amir E. Aharoni amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il wrote:
But all of the above are nice dreams about the future. Is there any
proven experience from the past that
2010/7/25 Andreas Kolbe jayen...@yahoo.com:
From: David Gerard dger...@gmail.com
Yes, the devil is in the details, and in working out
the correct parameters for default IP access. Each language
version of any project could make its own determination in
this regard. Arabic, no Mohammed
2010/7/15 Keegan Peterzell keegan.w...@gmail.com:
Okay, this thread has intrigued me and I thought the answers would pan out
and it seems to have gone in various directions, but it was initiated by
Milos so I'll focus on what I perceive to be his problem: Corruption
(through careerism,
As you maybe now, after the sudden death of Lech Kaczynski (jn airjet
crash in Smolens) we have now fast presidential election. One of the
most serious candidates Bronisław Komorowski was cached with printed
copy of Wikipedia article about
Rada Bezpieczeństwa Narodowego
2010/5/13 Jay Walsh jwa...@wikimedia.org:
SVG versions of the new globe, and the Wikipedia identity can be found here:
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Wikimedia_official_marks
I don't believe all of those assets have migrated to Commons yet.
Hope you won't forget to change the logo
2010/5/9 marcos tal_t...@yahoo.es:
Please, read good. Common Sense. Do you think it´s of common sense delete
this?...
Yes. If we are really to follow your POV. Muhammad pictures are far
more offensive for muslim people than porno stuff.
--
Tomek Polimerek Ganicz
2010/5/8 David Levy lifeisunf...@gmail.com:
Samuel Klein wrote:
I don't think this is a technical issue at all. Considering how
flexible and reversible wiki-actions are, it seems eminently
appropriate to me for the project founder to have 'unlimited
technical power' on the projects -- just
2010/5/8 Anthony wikim...@inbox.org:
I dunno, when framed that way it seems the answer is to be family-friendly,
and to let the specialists get their information in specialist resources.
So... are we now going to start writting USfamilyfriendlypedia(tm) ?
There is plenty of stuff to be delete
2010/5/8 Anthony wikim...@inbox.org:
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Tomasz Ganicz polime...@gmail.com wrote:
Well.. maybe... but bear in mind that it is really hard to discuss the
pictures you can't see, and commons-delinker bot actions are really
difficuilt to revert.
So fix commons
2010/3/26 Svip svi...@gmail.com:
On 25 March 2010 20:50, Isabell Long isabell...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 March 2010 19:48, Yaroslav M. Blanter pute...@mccme.ru wrote:
I don't think there are any restrictions but then I am not overly
familiar with EU law.
I guess you will not be able to fly
2010/3/25 Isabell Long isabell...@gmail.com:
On 24 March 2010 22:41, Cary Bass c...@wikimedia.org wrote:
The call for applications for Wikimania Scholarships to attend
Wikimania 2010 https://wm10schols.wikimedia.org/in Gdansk, Poland
(July 9-11) is now open. The Wikimedia Foundation offers
2010/3/6 ksaka98 ksak...@gmail.com:
Hi from jawp.
山吹色の御菓子(kigen2700nen) 's question is
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/wiki/foundation/190708#190708
Wikipedia英語版にはWikipedia's principlesがあります。
これは、各言語版に於いて参加者の裁量で自由に変更することができるのですか？
Wikipedia英語版にあるprinciple and
2010/2/26 Bod Notbod bodnot...@gmail.com:
All of which led me to look at the foundation's staff page:
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Staff
I think answers to these questions will be very useful to strategy
volunteers and so I'd like permission (or explicit advice not) to
paste up the
2010/2/26 Casey Brown li...@caseybrown.org:
All this being said, don't feel bad if you want to run something
through Cary first. He can always help you figure out who's the best
person to handle your query, it might not necessarily even *be* a
staff member.
For my experience - even Cary
2010/2/21 Ray Saintonge sainto...@telus.net:
Anthony wrote:
Tomasz Ganicz wrote:
Do we agree with the idea, that at that
time everything uploaded was under GNU FDL or not
Definitely not. You were supposed to release uploads under the GFDL, *if
you were the copyright owner
2010/2/21 Ray Saintonge sainto...@telus.net:
Tomasz Ganicz wrote:
2010/2/20 Ray Saintonge:
Probabilistic arguments are difficult to establish when the majority
still believes in legal certainty in the same way that it believes in God.
I am not quite sure what you wanted to say :-) Anyway
2010/2/20 geni geni...@gmail.com:
On 20 February 2010 05:54, The Cunctator cuncta...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes. This is idiotic. The logo contest followed the same rules as all other
submissions to Wikipedia -- they were submitted under the GFDL.
Evidence?
--
Evidence of what? At the beginning
2010/2/20 geni geni...@gmail.com:
On 20 February 2010 19:14, Tomasz Ganicz polime...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/2/20 geni geni...@gmail.com:
On 20 February 2010 05:54, The Cunctator cuncta...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes. This is idiotic. The logo contest followed the same rules as all other
submissions
2010/2/20 Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com:
On 20 February 2010 22:49, Tomasz Ganicz polime...@gmail.com wrote:
Evidence? :-) Is there any formal document of Wikimedia Foundation
Board of Trustees which says, that logo candidates are a special case
for copyright issues or it is just your
2010/2/20 Ray Saintonge sainto...@telus.net:
Probabilistic arguments are difficult to establish when the majority
still believes in legal certainty in the same way that it believes in God.
I am not quite sure what you wanted to say :-) Anyway - this cited
sentence is for me a nice expression
2010/2/19 David Gerard dger...@gmail.com:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Florence Devouard anthe...@yahoo.com
Date: 19 February 2010 21:19
Subject: [Wikipedia-l] Please HELP save Wikipedia history ! (urgent)
To: wikipedi...@lists.wikimedia.org
An editor on META is having the
Hi,
I think it is worth reading:
http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/%22Batuta%27s_case_became_something_of_a_milestone_in_the_development_of_Wikipedia%22_-_interview_with_Konrad_Godlewski
IMHO perfect example showing why Wikipedia is unique :-)
Cheers,
--
Tomek Polimerek Ganicz
2010/1/15 Milos Rancic mill...@gmail.com:
Based on Erik's statistics [1] and Nikola's addition of Internet users
[2] and the list of Wikimedia chapters [3], here is the first set of
conclusions.
* United Arab Emirates, Bulgaria, Uganda, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan:
I have good contacts with
2009/12/20 Laura Hale la...@fanhistory.com:
This was posted to the Strategy wiki but I don't think I ever mentioned it
on list. The case study itself can be found at
http://www.fanhistory.com/FHproposal.pdf . The blog entry about the case
study can be found at
2009/12/20 Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.org:
Tomasz Ganicz wrote:
2009/12/20 Laura Hale la...@fanhistory.com:
This was posted to the Strategy wiki but I don't think I ever mentioned it
on list. The case study itself can be found at
http://www.fanhistory.com/FHproposal.pdf . The blog
2009/11/22 Ray Saintonge sainto...@telus.net:
Tomasz Ganicz wrote:
The
idea is to create a Staging Area - a wiki (or non-wiki) project
which is not public and can be used for media and meta-data mass
storage before sending the stuff to public projects. The idea is that
all permissions
2009/11/22 Robert Rohde raro...@gmail.com:
For some applications (though not necessarily all), it might help if
the OTRS process was replaced by a standard online permission form
rather than having Wikimedians negotiate with outsiders in the hope of
getting them to say magic words.
I might
2009/10/31 Olli ollinpos...@gmail.com:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Olli ollinpos...@gmail.com
Date: 2009/10/31
Subject: Wikipedia christmas calendar?
To: translator...@lists.wikimedia.org
What about a wikipedia christmas calendar? It can maybe preview some
articles or
2009/6/20 Ray Saintonge sainto...@telus.net:
Milos Rancic wrote:
I've got the first report. There are no information that something
happened to any Wikimedian.
Take a look at [1]. I don't expect bigger scale problems in Iran, but
not just because of that analysis. Except theocratic
2009/5/8 Nikola Smolenski smole...@eunet.yu:
I am wary of this: Users often missed the ‘edit’ buttons next to each
section, clicking on ‘edit this page’ all the way at the top. In my
experience, users do exactly the opposite, and I have seen new users who
know how to edit sections asking how
2009/5/7 Dedalus deda...@wikipedia.be:
Congratulations to the Poland team for winning the Wikimania 2010 bid!
Thank you :-) Actually we are all very happy but also shocked in
Poland. Now, we feel great responsibility to organize Wikimania as
well as we are able or even better :-) I think all
2009/3/31 DaB. w...@daniel.baur4.info:
Hello all,
I think that when such a number of people come together it would be nice to
have a key-signing in Berlin. If you have no idea, what a key-signing is, look
at the wikipedia-article [[en:Key_signing_party]].
If you don't own a pgp-key yet and
Hi,
Wikimedia Polska Conference 2009 s a fourth event organized by the
Wikimedia Polska to encourage ideas, exchange of Wikimedia projects
users in Poland and people connected with free software, free
knowledge and free culture in a information
society. We invite everyone interested in all areas
2009/3/4 Sue Gardner sgard...@wikimedia.org:
Erik had proposed that articles which meet these three criteria be deleted
upon request: 1) they are not balanced and complete, 2) the subject is only
marginally notable, and 3) the subject wants the article deleted. This would
shift the bar
2009/3/2 Sue Gardner sgard...@wikimedia.org:
Hi folks,
I've been increasingly concerned lately about Wikimedia's coverage of living
people, both within biographies of living people (BLPs) on Wikipedia, and in
coverage of living people in non-BLP text. I've asked the board to put this
issue
2009/1/11 Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com:
When you talk about reasonable decisions, what is it that makes something
reasonable? The fact that people like Mohamed consider Egyptian Arabic as
ignorant makes clear their position, but is that reasonable ? The language
committee has
2009/1/11 Milos Rancic mill...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Milos Rancic mill...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Tomasz Ganicz polime...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I think there should be not only computer-linguists experts like
Evertype in LangCom, but you
2009/1/10 James Rigg jamesrigg1...@googlemail.com:
Thanks geni.
So, to put it crudely, the talk of full transparency and lack of
hierarchy is now viewed as just naive idealism that existed at the
start of the project, and which has now been abandoned?
I think it was all about Wikimedia wiki
2009/1/9 Brian brian.min...@colorado.edu:
Why are so few community-developed mediawiki extensions used by the
Foundation?
Why do developers have such priviledged access to the source code, and the
community such little input?
Why must the community 'vote' on extensions such as Semantic
2008/12/22 Milos Rancic mill...@gmail.com:
Many times we raised the issue that many (maybe majority of) users of
Wikimedia content don't realize that it is possible to edit pages on
Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. Last time I was talking about
it a couple of days ago, during the
2008/12/22 David Gerard dger...@gmail.com:
2008/12/22 Milos Rancic mill...@gmail.com:
Then, I wanted to see what is the value of Britannica; without
success. It is a private company (in US sense of that meaning;
public companies in European sense are just companies owned by some
local or
2008/12/12 Florence Devouard anthe...@yahoo.com:
We all perfectly know that if this particular image was borderline,
there are images or texts that are illegal in certain countries. I am
not even speaking of China here, but good old westernish countries.
In some countries, it may be
2008/11/25 Mike Godwin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Without criticizing Mozilla at all, I'll note that we're not that much
like Mozilla in the scale on which license trademarks commercially.
It's probably difficult for anyone outside the Foundation to imagine
the sheer number of licensing opportunities
2008/11/24 Florence Devouard [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Luiz Augusto wrote:
First, is that wrong that a chapter is made in majority or entirety by
non-editors ? I would tend to think it is unfortunate, but not wrong. A
person may be part of the wikimedia mouvement without editing a lot. The
person
68 matches
Mail list logo
