I just wanted to mention here that I've started a new thread at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Berkman_Sciences_Po_banner_taken_down
Since our research banner was taken down, we've been paying a great deal of
attention to the various concerns
Speaking off the record and in my personal capacity - fuckin' A. Thank you
for being the one sane voice :p
On Sunday, 11 December 2011, Renata St renataw...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem is that the research committee made only a token effort
at finding or following relevant onwiki policy or
Is swearing acceptable on this email list? If so, I will unsubscribe
as I would prefer not to to be surprised by offensive language in my
mail box.
Fae
On 12 December 2011 18:59, Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Speaking off the record and in my personal capacity - fuckin' A. Thank you
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 06:59:24PM +, Oliver Keyes wrote:
On Sunday, 11 December 2011, Renata St renataw...@gmail.com wrote:
as per WIARM.
As I said, analyze and nitpick things to death. Does any of that above *
really* matter?
Speaking off the record and in my personal capacity -
Kim,
One thing that confuses me. On the Foundation-l list, why do you
insist on peppering your comments with English Wikipedia alphabet soup
and references to local project policy? A pretty large proportion of
the readers of this list have no interest in such pages, and no
knowledge of what you
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 07:01:58PM -0500, Nathan wrote:
Kim,
One thing that confuses me. On the Foundation-l list, why do you
insist on peppering your comments with English Wikipedia alphabet soup
and references to local project policy? A pretty large proportion of
the readers of this list