Re: [Foundation-l] [Internal-l] Regarding Berkman/Sciences Po study

2011-12-16 Thread Jérôme Hergueux
I just wanted to mention here that I've started a new thread at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Berkman_Sciences_Po_banner_taken_down Since our research banner was taken down, we've been paying a great deal of attention to the various concerns

Re: [Foundation-l] [Internal-l] Regarding Berkman/Sciences Po study

2011-12-12 Thread Oliver Keyes
Speaking off the record and in my personal capacity - fuckin' A. Thank you for being the one sane voice :p On Sunday, 11 December 2011, Renata St renataw...@gmail.com wrote: The problem is that the research committee made only a token effort at finding or following relevant onwiki policy or

Re: [Foundation-l] [Internal-l] Regarding Berkman/Sciences Po study

2011-12-12 Thread Fae
Is swearing acceptable on this email list? If so, I will unsubscribe as I would prefer not to to be surprised by offensive language in my mail box. Fae On 12 December 2011 18:59, Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org wrote: Speaking off the record and in my personal capacity - fuckin' A. Thank you

Re: [Foundation-l] [Internal-l] Regarding Berkman/Sciences Po study

2011-12-12 Thread Kim Bruning
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 06:59:24PM +, Oliver Keyes wrote: On Sunday, 11 December 2011, Renata St renataw...@gmail.com wrote: as per WIARM. As I said, analyze and nitpick things to death. Does any of that above * really* matter? Speaking off the record and in my personal capacity -

Re: [Foundation-l] [Internal-l] Regarding Berkman/Sciences Po study

2011-12-12 Thread Nathan
Kim, One thing that confuses me. On the Foundation-l list, why do you insist on peppering your comments with English Wikipedia alphabet soup and references to local project policy? A pretty large proportion of the readers of this list have no interest in such pages, and no knowledge of what you

Re: [Foundation-l] [Internal-l] Regarding Berkman/Sciences Po study

2011-12-12 Thread Kim Bruning
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 07:01:58PM -0500, Nathan wrote: Kim, One thing that confuses me. On the Foundation-l list, why do you insist on peppering your comments with English Wikipedia alphabet soup and references to local project policy? A pretty large proportion of the readers of this list