On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Sue Gardnersusanpgard...@gmail.com wrote:
Sure. Actually the New York chapter probably sends some press releases to US
media too; I'm not sure.
FYI We have had a number of contacts with journalists, but so far we
have not been in the habit of putting out formal
What an insult, Derrick only rates a solicitor
From: Gregory Maxwell gmaxw...@gmail.com
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2009 3:17:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] About that sue and be damned to
Hoi,
Please explain why would Derrick rate a solicitor ?
Thanks,
GerardM
2009/7/12 Geoffrey Plourde geo.p...@yahoo.com
What an insult, Derrick only rates a solicitor
From: Gregory Maxwell gmaxw...@gmail.com
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
2009/7/12 Geoffrey Plourde geo.p...@yahoo.com:
What an insult, Derrick only rates a solicitor
As opposed to a barrister? You're mistaken; solicitors would be
involved in such matters before going to court. Barristers would only
be instructed by the solicitors when they were going to court (or,
2009/7/12 Gregory Maxwell gmaxw...@gmail.com
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Tom Maaswinkeltom.maaswinkel@
12wiki.eu wrote:
[snip]
They only thing that I don't understand is that they claim that no-one
from
the wikimedia foundation ever responded to this. Is there any reason for
this?
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 2:11 AM, Tom Maaswinkeltom.maaswin...@12wiki.eu wrote:
The part I am talking about is the part where they say that they want to
talk to the Wikimedia Fundation to have a discussion about making
low-resolution images of paintings in its collection available!
2009/7/12 Robert Rohde raro...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 2:11 AM, Tom Maaswinkeltom.maaswin...@12wiki.eu
wrote:
The part I am talking about is the part where they say that they want to
talk to the Wikimedia Fundation to have a discussion about making
low-resolution images of
A Wikipedia Signpost article intended to recount the facts and context
of the legal threat is in progress:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2009-07-13/Copyright_threat
Comments, suggestions, and contributions are welcome. In particular,
there is some discussion on the
2009/7/11 Sue Gardner susanpgard...@gmail.com:
Point of clarification -- the Wikimedia Foundation sends out press releases
to international media, not just US media. We have no plans to send out a
press release on this issue.
Of course, what I meant was that only the WMF sends press
2009/7/11 John at Darkstar vac...@jeb.no:
Local chapters can say something about whats going on, they can't make
claims on behalf of others, but they can interpret written statements
like any other blogger or news outlet. Just remember that wmf sends
press releases on behalf of wmf, nobody
Sure. Actually the New York chapter probably sends some press releases to US
media too; I'm not sure.
--Original Message--
From: Thomas Dalton
To: susanpgard...@gmail.com
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
Sent: Jul 11, 2009 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] About that sue and be
Point of clarification -- the Wikimedia Foundation sends out press releases to
international media, not just US media. We have no plans to send out a press
release on this issue.
Thanks,
Sue
--Original Message--
From: Thomas Dalton
Sender: foundation-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org
To:
Where the Norwegian chapter can be helpful is in letting us know how
such a thing might play out if we were concerned with pictures from
Norway's national gallery.
Ec
I guess you are speaking about GalleriNOR, which is a joint effort
between Nasjonalbiblioteket and Norsk Folkemuseum. Sorry
2009/7/11 John at Darkstar vac...@jeb.no:
In the case of GalleriNOR several people uploaded images from the site
without prior agreement with neither NB nor NF. After a while I get in
touch with them and asked how we should handle the case, what people
believed was the right thing to do from
David Gerard wrote:
2009/7/11 John at Darkstar vac...@jeb.no:
In the case of GalleriNOR several people uploaded images from the site
without prior agreement with neither NB nor NF. After a while I get in
touch with them and asked how we should handle the case, what people
believed was the
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 6:42 PM, Gregory Maxwellgmaxw...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
For clarity sake I should point out that the neither the complaint to
Wikimedia, nor the response to the OTRS reply, included any offer of
compromise.
Also worth mentioning is that a copyright complaint by the NPG
16 matches
Mail list logo
