2009/1/25 Dan Rosenthal swatjes...@gmail.com:
Yeah, agreed. While on-topic for the list, it's off-topic for this
thread. U.S. intelligence agency involvement in the development of
open source products, especially media wiki, however *IS* a topic I am
very much interested in seeing further
That means I can clarify why my much hated factual correction was
appropriate. Here was the original statement:
If the CIA were to hand you a improved-mediawiki binary, sure
Let's briefly suppose that there are binaries for mediawiki (which is false
- but suppose they only gave you byte code
2009/1/25 David Gerard dger...@gmail.com:
Has anyone actually asked the CIA for MediaWiki extensions and
enhancements? It'd be worth asking.
We don't know much about what they have done but most of their
developments are more likely to be of interest to corporate wikis than
wikipedia.
--
2009/1/25 geni geni...@gmail.com:
2009/1/25 David Gerard dger...@gmail.com:
Has anyone actually asked the CIA for MediaWiki extensions and
enhancements? It'd be worth asking.
We don't know much about what they have done but most of their
developments are more likely to be of interest to
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 9:19 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/1/25 geni geni...@gmail.com:
2009/1/25 David Gerard dger...@gmail.com:
Has anyone actually asked the CIA for MediaWiki extensions and
enhancements? It'd be worth asking.
I suspect any significant changes they
