On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 4:53 AM, Liam Wyatt liamwy...@gmail.com wrote:
Scott, the director of rights and reproductions a the NPG kindly wrote
directly back to me very quickly and said (quoting with permission):
We did, indeed, investigate immediately. I am expecting changes to be made,
-Original Message-
From: foundation-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:foundation-l-
boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Liam Wyatt
Sent: 16 June 2011 05:36
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] NPG still violating copyright
Follow up on this thread
On 16 June 2011 09:06, Scott MacDonald doc.wikipe...@ntlworld.com wrote:
Well, they appear to have re-written their blurb to make it far enough away
from Wikipedia text to keep them safe.
http://www.npg.org.uk/collections/search/person/mp07767/john-michael-wright
What an effort, just to
-Original Message-
From: foundation-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:foundation-l-
boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of David Gerard
Sent: 16 June 2011 09:13
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] NPG still violating copyright
On 16 June 2011
On 16 June 2011 11:03, Scott MacDonald doc.wikipe...@ntlworld.com wrote:
The only other one I had noted was
http://www.npg.org.uk/collections/search/person/mp01315/william-dobson
This does seem to have been sorted. But I recall people saying there were
others at the time, but I don't have
Follow up on this thread from last week:
NPG have pushed through changes to their content and it is now on their live
site.
Please advise if there are any further issues.
-Liam
wittylama.com/blog
Peace, love metadata
___
foundation-l mailing list
-Original Message-
From: foundation-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:foundation-l-
boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Liam Wyatt
Sent: 13 June 2011 06:20
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] NPG still violating copyright
Hi Scott
Hm, I'm afraid that is not sufficient. :-) It's CC-BY-SA.
Kind regards
Ziko
Thanks. I mean all they need to add is text taken from Wikipedia - it
shouldn't be too hard.
Scott
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
On 13 June 2011 09:23, Ziko van Dijk zvand...@googlemail.com wrote:
Thanks. I mean all they need to add is text taken from Wikipedia - it
shouldn't be too hard.
Hm, I'm afraid that is not sufficient. :-) It's CC-BY-SA.
*Surely* the NPG should be able to figure out that by doing this,
Hm, I'm afraid that is not sufficient. :-) It's CC-BY-SA.
*Surely* the NPG should be able to figure out that by doing this,
they're leaving themselves wide open to copyright suits from all the
hundreds of thousands of smart, motivated geeks who HIT THE GODDAMN
ROOF when they sent that
On 13 June 2011 10:34, Fae fae...@gmail.com wrote:
Personally, I would rather see this as an opportunity for friendly dialogue
to help improve our working relationship.
Absolutely, a non-apocalyptic response is desirable.
However, they're still being blitheringly stupid and obnoxious, and
On 13 June 2011 09:47, Scott MacDonald doc.wikipe...@ntlworld.com wrote:
Hm, I'm afraid that is not sufficient. :-) It's CC-BY-SA.
*Surely* the NPG should be able to figure out that by doing this,
they're leaving themselves wide open to copyright suits from all the
hundreds of thousands of
Scott, the director of rights and reproductions a the NPG kindly wrote directly
back to me very quickly and said (quoting with permission):
We did, indeed, investigate immediately. I am expecting changes to be made,
shortly.
So, I assume that not only will changes be made to their website soon
-Original Message-
From: foundation-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:foundation-l-
boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Liam Wyatt
Sent: 14 June 2011 02:53
Cc: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] NPG still violating copyright
Scott
On 13 June 2011 09:29, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
*Surely* the NPG should be able to figure out that by doing this,
they're leaving themselves wide open to copyright suits from all the
hundreds of thousands of smart, motivated geeks who HIT THE GODDAMN
ROOF when they sent that legal
Nicely done Liam, thanks.
Cheers,
Fae
--
http://enwp.org/user_talk:fae
Guide to email tags: http://j.mp/faetags
On 14 June 2011 02:53, Liam Wyatt liamwy...@gmail.com wrote:
Scott, the director of rights and reproductions a the NPG kindly wrote
directly back to me very quickly and said
Back in March this year, I pointed out in Wikien-1 that the UKs National
Portrait Gallery, was reusing Wikipedia content (and in particular my work)
without any attribution (and indeed was claiming copyright).
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2011-March/108731.html
This got some
Hi Scott,
It was raised with the NPG, as promised, at the time. They assured me they
would investigate immediately on the pages indicated as well as make a
random sampling of other pages on their site to see if it had happened
elsewhere.
I'll re-raise this with them today and get back to you when
18 matches
Mail list logo
