On 06/21/2011 12:25 AM, MZMcBride wrote:
Thanks for the detailed response. :-)
Milos Rancic wrote:
As usual, discussion would be held on Meta. If there are serious
arguments against creation of Simple French Wikipedia, we would consider
them, of course. However, arguments like I don't like
After a month of on-list talk -- sometimes very heated, sometimes very
quiet -- Language committee has agreed about the next wording of the
part of the new policy [1] related to the simple languages:
* Can there be wikis in simple languages?
*: Yes, in principle. But two special criteria would
On 6/20/2011 10:29 AM, Milos Rancic wrote:
After a month of on-list talk -- sometimes very heated, sometimes very
quiet -- Language committee has agreed about the next wording of the
part of the new policy [1] related to the simple languages:
* Can there be wikis in simple languages?
*: Yes,
On 06/20/2011 04:29 PM, Milos Rancic wrote:
After a month of on-list talk -- sometimes very heated, sometimes very
quiet -- Language committee has agreed about the next wording of the
part of the new policy [1] related to the simple languages:
* Can there be wikis in simple languages?
*:
Milos Rancic wrote:
After a month of on-list talk -- sometimes very heated, sometimes very
quiet -- Language committee has agreed about the next wording of the
part of the new policy [1] related to the simple languages:
* Can there be wikis in simple languages?
*: Yes, in principle. But two
On 06/20/2011 07:25 PM, MZMcBride wrote:
Milos Rancic wrote:
After a month of on-list talk -- sometimes very heated, sometimes very
quiet -- Language committee has agreed about the next wording of the
part of the new policy [1] related to the simple languages:
* Can there be wikis in simple
On 06/20/2011 08:23 PM, Milos Rancic wrote:
The logical line of my thoughts was to allow *any* project in simple (or
equivalent) language if there is a scientific basis. Mostly because
there could be created valid communities around non-world-languages with
large number of speakers (German and
The last request was a 2 line proposal added by an anon ip[1] in passing,
their only edit. I wouldn't call that a community.
Theo
[1]
http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Requests_for_new_languages%2FWikipedia_Simple_German_4action=historysubmitdiff=2519024oldid=2087184
On Tue, Jun 21,
On 06/20/2011 08:30 PM, Theo10011 wrote:
The last request was a 2 line proposal added by an anon ip[1] in passing,
their only edit. I wouldn't call that a community.
However, the first three were valid ones.
___
foundation-l mailing list
WIk
On 20 June 2011 15:29, Milos Rancic mill...@gmail.com wrote:
*: Yes, in principle. But two special criteria would need to be met: the
language should be a world language with many L2 users, and there must
be a reliable, published specification of the controlled language to be
used.
Hello Milos,
Thank you for the elaboration. Indeed I am afraid that the concept is
a little too narrow. A language like Dutch is not really a world
language, but it as a lot of speakers with Dutch as a foreign or
second language. Also, as far as I know Simple English Wikipedia
mentions Basic
On 06/20/2011 08:55 PM, David Gerard wrote:
On 20 June 2011 15:29, Milos Rancic mill...@gmail.com wrote:
*: Yes, in principle. But two special criteria would need to be met: the
language should be a world language with many L2 users, and there must
be a reliable, published specification of the
Thanks for the detailed response. :-)
Milos Rancic wrote:
As usual, discussion would be held on Meta. If there are serious
arguments against creation of Simple French Wikipedia, we would consider
them, of course. However, arguments like I don't like simple
projects won't be counted.
Well,
13 matches
Mail list logo
