2009/5/22 Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com:
2009/5/22 private musings thepmacco...@gmail.com:
Hi all,
I saw this news item today;
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8061979.stm
and felt that it was tangentially related to the discussions on this list
concerning sexual content on wikimedia -
I concur. Getting an unsatisfactory response does not mean that you should
bang on about it incessantly.
- Chris
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 11:41 AM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/5/22 Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com:
2009/5/22 private musings thepmacco...@gmail.com:
Hi
+2
skype: node.ue
2009/5/22 David Gerard dger...@gmail.com:
2009/5/22 Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com:
2009/5/22 private musings thepmacco...@gmail.com:
Hi all,
I saw this news item today;
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8061979.stm
and felt that it was tangentially related to the
--- On Thu, 5/21/09, private musings thepmacco...@gmail.com wrote:
- I'm particularly
keen at the moment
to try and discern whether or not it's possible to move
forward in any way
on this issue, or whether or not we're sort of stuck in the
bed we've made
to date all thoughts and
Hi all,
I saw this news item today;
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8061979.stm
and felt that it was tangentially related to the discussions on this list
concerning sexual content on wikimedia - it's prompted me to make this reply
anywhoo (both the story and the comments are worth reading, and I
from the photograph.
From: private musings thepmacco...@gmail.com
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 7:50:09 PM
Subject: [Foundation-l] Proposals re : sexual content on wikimedia
Hi all,
I saw
