On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 15:52, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
The final page for people who have a crappy article about themselves
still needs severe tightening and organisation, though with a mind to
not causing trouble for OTRS volunteers, who after all are the ones
getting the
2009/3/4 Jim Redmond j...@scrubnugget.com:
I'm working on that now. I've half a mind to increase the point size on the
phrase Wikipedia has no editorial board and put it in blink tags; if
people could actually grok that, then much of the rest of that text could
become unnecessary.
I just
2009/3/3 David Gerard dger...@gmail.com:
2009/3/3 Birgitte SB birgitte...@yahoo.com:
I there is simpler way to solicit these reports this without all the false
positives that might come from a report a problem link. I imagine that
all these people who have issues must click on the Help
Are Wikia's lawyers as paranoid as Mike Godwin, or do they allow staff to
get involved in enforcing policy violations?
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
Hoi,
I doubt that it is worth our while to discuss Wikia policies.. certainly
with loaded questions like this one. Then again, it might be considered a
compliment .. as paranoid as Mike Godwin .. I like Mike :)
Thanks,
GerardM
2009/3/3 Anthony wikim...@inbox.org
Are Wikia's lawyers as
David Gerard wrote:
Michael, is there any reason not to put Anthony on moderation?
Actually, the problem is the thread, which is a complaint about Wikia
practices that is off-topic for this list. Anthony didn't start the
discussion, it's the thread that should be moderated.
--Michael Snow
2009/3/3 Birgitte SB birgitte...@yahoo.com:
I there is simpler way to solicit these reports this without all the false
positives that might come from a report a problem link. I imagine that
all these people who have issues must click on the Help link in the sidebar
while looking contact
