This is definitively a wrong approach. Just because part of their
content violate our license does not mean that ALL their content are
under CC-SA-BY. No court will ever follow such a logic.
Greetings
Ting
On 25.04.2011 08:45, wrote Joan Goma:
As Ray saids legal prosecution to claim for
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Joan Goma jrg...@gmail.com wrote:
As Ray saids legal prosecution to claim for formal accomplishing of the
copyright terms is expensive and difficult. But the same happens the other
way around.
I would like to have a clear legal opinion about applying the terms
On 04/24/11 11:45 PM, Joan Goma wrote:
As Ray saids legal prosecution to claim for formal accomplishing of the
copyright terms is expensive and difficult. But the same happens the other
way around.
I would like to have a clear legal opinion about applying the terms without
going to court.
On 25 April 2011 07:45, Joan Goma jrg...@gmail.com wrote:
They have copied articles from Chinese Wikipedia and translated articles
from English and Japanese Wikipedia so in my opinion their work is a
derivative one
This is true.
and according to the CCSA terms it is also CCSA no mater
