This is my report on the April board meeting, which was held in Berlin
on April 3-5, in conjunction with a meeting/conference of the Wikimedia
chapters. But first, let me say that it was wonderful to be able to
coordinate so these could happen in the same place. I really appreciated
the
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 1:01 AM, Milos Rancic mill...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Samuel Klein meta...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, things are moving forward, this is true. And I will be happy to
see free culture movement based on Tolstoy's, Kropotkin's and
Goldman's ideas. At
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 3:19 PM, private musings thepmacco...@gmail.com wrote:
On a tangential note, I've also been looking at various governmental, and
NGO 'codes of conduct', some of which recommend things like accurate record
keeping on model information, ensuring users confirm that they
heh - as I say in the essay (and the noticeboard) - oh the irony!
My hands are indeed filthy - although I never went blind ;-) - and yes, we
still need to talk about this stuff.
cheers,
Peter,
PM.
How about 'unclean hands'.
In the recent en.wp discussion that you mention, you added an
Hi,
As has been mentioned elsewhere in comments on your writings, you have
good ideas which aren't directly related to nudity or sexual content.
1) respect human subjects of photos and other media
1a) get explicit model consent, both for models who are 'many meters
away' and for significant
--- On Mon, 4/20/09, Samuel Klein meta...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Samuel Klein meta...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Principle and pragmatism with nudity and sexual
content
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Date: Monday, April 20, 2009, 3:39 AM
2009/4/20 Birgitte SB birgitte...@yahoo.com:
I second this. Does anyone really believe it is even possible to set one
standard of what it means to be 'collegial' and 'collaborative' for all
cultures? These things are not absolute values and each community needs to
work out what standards
--- On Mon, 4/20/09, Samuel Klein meta...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Samuel Klein meta...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Principle and pragmatism with nudity and sexual
content
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Date: Monday, April 20, 2009, 3:39 AM
Someone asked me a question on the French wikipedia and to be fair, I am
not sure what to answer.
The CURRENT text of the licencing proposition gives a link to
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
Whilst the text of the resolution adopted in december 2007
Florence Devouard wrote:
Someone asked me a question on the French wikipedia and to be fair, I am
not sure what to answer.
The CURRENT text of the licencing proposition gives a link to
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
Whilst the text of the resolution adopted in december
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Florence Devouard anthe...@yahoo.com wrote:
By the way, is that completely normal that the site notice on the
english wikipedia is occupied by Wikimania scholarship rather than by
the change of licence ?
With all due respect to Wikimania, it seems to me the
2009/4/20 Florence Devouard anthe...@yahoo.com:
Whilst the text of the resolution adopted in december 2007
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Resolution:License_update
Refers to
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/us/
To my knowledge, the jurisdictional variant URL wasn't
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 12:11, Florence Devouard anthe...@yahoo.com wrote:
By the way, is that completely normal that the site notice on the
english wikipedia is occupied by Wikimania scholarship rather than by
the change of licence ?
With all due respect to Wikimania, it seems to me the
Jim Redmond wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 12:11, Florence Devouard anthe...@yahoo.com wrote:
By the way, is that completely normal that the site notice on the
english wikipedia is occupied by Wikimania scholarship rather than by
the change of licence ?
With all due respect to Wikimania,
This being Volunteer Appreciation week in the US, I thought it was a
great chance for me to post to this list and post a Wikimedia blog
http://blog.wikimedia.org/2009/04/20/volunteer-appreciation/. I want to
thank everyone for being so welcoming. I am very excited about this
organization and
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:18 AM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/4/20 Birgitte SB birgitte...@yahoo.com:
I second this. Does anyone really believe it is even possible to set one
standard of what it means to be 'collegial' and 'collaborative' for all
cultures? These things are
2009/4/17 Thomas de Souza Buckup thomasdesouzabuc...@gmail.com:
Erik,
Congratulations! The results of this survey will be very useful for all of
us. Could you please answer a couple of questions:
- Can they/you/we wiki the results on Meta?
- When will the data become available for the
http://www.komisigratis.net/?id=jokarwilis
Sent from my BlackBerry®
powered by Sinyal Kuat INDOSAT
-Original Message-
From: Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:35:19
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing Listfoundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Cc: Ruediger
18 matches
Mail list logo
