I'm afraid you didn't get my questions. Sorry if I wasn't clear enough. I
couldn't find an answer on your reply to how can he archive while blocked?
and why can't he request a non-blocked member of LangCom to perform desired
actions on Meta?
Sad to know that nobody else is interested. I see,
Hoi.
The committee is doing its things. Working on archiving is peripheral to our
work and consequently the answer to your question is the committee working
has an unreserved YES.
Thanks,
GerardM
2011/8/10 Lucas Teles salvadore...@hotmail.com
I'm afraid you didn't get my questions.
Hi Milos
I am not quite sure I follow.
Those who like would have to go to diffs ?
which would leave the button to more engaged editors?
I personally find the like button on Facebook the dumbest idea ever - it
means you are too stupid or too lazy to think up anything and just go around
clicking
Or, Rui, perhaps you have plenty of original thoughts and are a very
intelligent person and you post all of your original thoughts, but it seems
a bit stupid and like a waste of space to say thank you for saying that or
i agree with you every time you agree with someone and have no
disagreement
M. Williamson
Obviousy I post my thoughts where these make a contribution. It says so
below leave a comment or leave it alone.
Rui
2011/8/10 M. Williamson node...@gmail.com
Or, Rui, perhaps you have plenty of original thoughts and are a very
intelligent person and you post all of your
Not yet.
So far you can find some videos here:
http://www.youtube.com/user/WikimediaIL
But they will be in Commons soon
_
*Béria Lima*
http://wikimedia.pt/(351) 925 171 484
*Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter livre
acesso ao somatório de todo o
Rui, I meant the impersonal you, not the direct you.
2011/8/10 Rui Correia correia@gmail.com
M. Williamson
Obviousy I post my thoughts where these make a contribution. It says so
below leave a comment or leave it alone.
Rui
2011/8/10 M. Williamson node...@gmail.com
Or, Rui,
I am interest in using them on wiki. Thanks.
HW
從︰ Béria Lima berial...@gmail.com
收件人︰ Waihorace waihor...@yahoo.com.hk; Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
傳送日期︰ 2011年08月10日 (週三) 5:54 PM
主題︰ Re: [Foundation-l] Wikimania 2011 video on Commons?
Not yet.
So far
Rui Correia wrote:
I personally find the like button on Facebook the dumbest idea ever - it
means you are too stupid or too lazy to think up anything and just go around
clicking like all over the place. It impoverishes the process, as where
there is a like there could have been a enriching
Hmm, it'd be a neat extension for Commons. I don't think like or +1
should be used, as they're not sufficiently wiki. But something that
expresses the same sentiment, that allows users to express approval of
good
photos (similar to Flickr), could be cool.
MZMcBride
Is the talk page not
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Yaroslav M. Blanter pute...@mccme.ruwrote:
Hmm, it'd be a neat extension for Commons. I don't think like or +1
should be used, as they're not sufficiently wiki. But something that
expresses the same sentiment, that allows users to express approval of
good
Yaroslav M. Blanter wrote:
MZMcBride wrote:
Hmm, it'd be a neat extension for Commons. I don't think like or +1
should be used, as they're not sufficiently wiki. But something that
expresses the same sentiment, that allows users to express approval of
good photos (similar to Flickr), could be
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 9:13 PM, M. Williamson node...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes but again as I said, most people will be looking for their languages on
http://www.wikipedia.org/ or in places where interwiki links are usually
found.
Mark,
Could you please propose a specific solution that would make
On 8/9/11 4:46 PM, Kirill Lokshin wrote:
2011/8/9 Delphine Ménardnotafi...@gmail.com
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Kirill Lokshinkirill.loks...@gmail.com
wrote:
Well, let's be clear here: in what sense are the chapters participating
in
the fundraiser, rather than merely being its
We do have a great substitute for the like button which is barnstars and
other awards. These are the ones I see frequently used to show appreciation
for specific edits. They could read something on the lines of: Here I award
you the Humor Barnstar for your great sense of humor shown in this edit
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Orionist orion@gmail.com wrote:
We do have a great substitute for the like button which is barnstars and
other awards.
Maybe a version of WikiLove could be built for Commons that leaves a
barnstar or similar for the creator of a file, without leaving the
Just I have to say Amen to you, Anthere. I see your point.
In addition, chapters need some time to make his job, that is, to involve
relevant people, to create a local structure that engages people to the real
benefits for an enterprise, a council, an academic institution with free
knowledge.
On 8/9/11 1:46 PM, David Gerard wrote:
(I don't think that is the intent - apparently WMF feels like it can
mess people around and still get 100% from them. I do consider that
the problems really haven't been considered.)
I don't think the WMF thinks that they can mess people around at all,
On 8/9/11 3:47 PM, Birgitte SB wrote:
It seems to me that these changes are about making chapters more into
franchises. Which I find to be exactly backwards.
It would be, if that's what it were about. But I can say with
confidence that at the board meeting, no one spoke about any ideas even
Redefining the chapters
who participated in a joint fundraiser with WMF as WMF's payment
processors is straight-up insulting.
Whoa, please slow down!
No one has said anything like that, and it isn't how the term is being
used. A chapter is a payment processor if it... processes payments.
On 8/9/11 10:27 AM, Kirill Lokshin wrote:
A more typical arrangement would be that the WMF would give a chapter the
right to use WMF trademarks, and in return a portion of the funds raised by
the chapter would be funneled back to the WMF. But what chapters seem to
want is for the WMF to sign
On 8/9/11 10:27 AM, Kirill Lokshin wrote:
A more typical arrangement would be that the WMF would give a chapter the
right to use WMF trademarks, and in return a portion of the funds raised by
the chapter would be funneled back to the WMF. But what chapters seem to
want is for the WMF to sign
On 10 August 2011 21:30, Jimmy Wales jwa...@wikia-inc.com wrote:
On 8/9/11 1:46 PM, David Gerard wrote:
(I don't think that is the intent - apparently WMF feels like it can
mess people around and still get 100% from them. I do consider that
the problems really haven't been considered.)
I
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Jimmy Wales jwa...@wikia-inc.com wrote:
It would be, if that's what it were about. But I can say with
confidence that at the board meeting, no one spoke about any ideas even
remotely similar to this, and I can't think of a single board member who
disagrees
On Aug 10, 2011, at 3:20 PM, Jimmy Wales jwa...@wikia-inc.com wrote:
On 8/9/11 3:47 PM, Birgitte SB wrote:
It seems to me that these changes are about making chapters more into
franchises. Which I find to be exactly backwards.
It would be, if that's what it were about. But I can say
2011/8/10 Delphine Ménard notafi...@gmail.com:
OK, I've read this sentence five times now, and this is what I read:
Board members agree that chapters should be directed or controlled in
a top-down fashion as franchises
I think there is a double negative here that is saying the opposite of
On Aug 10, 2011, at 3:32 PM, Jimmy Wales jwa...@wikia-inc.com wrote:
Redefining the chapters
who participated in a joint fundraiser with WMF as WMF's payment
processors is straight-up insulting.
Whoa, please slow down!
No one has said anything like that, and it isn't how the term is
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 7:22 PM, birgitte...@yahoo.com wrote:
I don't care what people spoke of, nor of what they desire, nor what their
agenda is. I never supposed that people were conspiring to fail. I care what
effect the actions people are proposing will result in. I am quite
On Aug 10, 2011, at 6:42 PM, Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 7:22 PM, birgitte...@yahoo.com wrote:
I don't care what people spoke of, nor of what they desire, nor what their
agenda is. I never supposed that people were conspiring to fail. I care
what effect
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 8:51 PM, birgitte...@yahoo.com wrote:
I don't think chapters are being cut off I think they are being
centralized. Centralization, not lack of funding, is what I believe will
make chapters ineffective. Frankly, I think cutting off their funding would
be less
On Aug 10, 2011, at 7:56 PM, Kirill Lokshin kirill.loks...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 8:51 PM, birgitte...@yahoo.com wrote:
I don't think chapters are being cut off I think they are being
centralized. Centralization, not lack of funding, is what I believe will
make
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 9:23 PM, birgitte...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Aug 10, 2011, at 7:56 PM, Kirill Lokshin kirill.loks...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 8:51 PM, birgitte...@yahoo.com wrote:
I don't think chapters are being cut off I think they are being
centralized.
Well the problem is that http://www.wikipedia.org/ should remain language
neutral IMHO. Otherwise, I would propose a link that says Is your language
not listed here?.
Unless anyone has any better ideas, perhaps we could work around this by
having such a message (which is relatively short), but
33 matches
Mail list logo
