http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Fundraising_2011#When_does_the_fundraiser_start.3F
Best,
Till
Am 19.10.2011 20:01, schrieb Chris Keating:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fundraising_2011 and don't forget to check
the discussion page for more places to discuss the fundraiser. As for a
Everyone,
I am pleased to announce that we have two contractors joining the Technology
team. Fabrice Florin will be joining us for the next six months as Product
Consultant, leading the development of the next version of the Article
Feedback Tool. Oliver Keyes (User: Ironholds on enwp) will be
Hi,
thanks for the extra info. It would be great if a more extensive timeline
could be entered into the actual information page. Dates I would be looking
for:
* When should translations be finished for the first batch
* When are relevant deadlines?
* When is the fundraiser scheduled to start
I'm not sure a consenus of
wikimedians is the best way to make legal decisions anyway, shouldn't we
consult an expert?
In a perfect world we'd have a legal department that vets each and every
image uploaded to Commons. The thing is, we'd need at least 200 lawyers from
all around the world,
On 24 October 2011 08:40, Howie Fung hf...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Everyone,
I am pleased to announce that we have two contractors joining the Technology
team. Fabrice Florin will be joining us for the next six months as Product
Consultant, leading the development of the next version of the
Hi Eric,
thanks for your answers. For me they were really helpful, and I hope they
can lead to some understanding-
Some of these ideas are explored here:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image_filter_referendum/Next_steps/en#Potential_models_for_hiding_images
Is there a similar brainstorming
With that in mind, I would humbly propose that we kill with fire at
this point the idea of a category-based image filtering system.
+1
d/sp
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
And another one, sorry, I cannot find the mail in which it was proposed. But
generally I think a hide/show-all solution would be acceptable to everybode.
There is still a lot of bad blood going around. And it would certainly be
easier to implement it referring to technical reasons of low bandwith,
On 24 October 2011 09:25, Orionist orion@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure a consenus of
wikimedians is the best way to make legal decisions anyway, shouldn't we
consult an expert?
In a perfect world we'd have a legal department that vets each and every
image uploaded to Commons. The thing
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:25, Orionist orion@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure a consenus of
wikimedians is the best way to make legal decisions anyway, shouldn't we
consult an expert?
In a perfect world we'd have a legal department that vets each and every
image uploaded to Commons. The
Welcome, Fabrice and Oliver. :)
Maggie
On Oct 24, 2011 1:31 AM, James Forrester ja...@jdforrester.org wrote:
On 24 October 2011 08:40, Howie Fung hf...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Everyone,
I am pleased to announce that we have two contractors joining the
Technology
team. Fabrice Florin will
2011/10/24 Carl Fürstenberg azat...@gmail.com:
It's a difference deciding if uploads of babes with big boobs are
stolen from the Internet at large or not, than to figure out if a line
drawing from World War II is free or not.
Indeed. In legal terminology, the difference is between a matter of
Hi all,
Since it hasn't really been mentioned, I just wanted to point out that this
image, never before available to the public in high resolution, was uploaded
to Commons as a result of our ongoing cooperative efforts with the US
National Archives (i.e., my residency). Its copyright status was
On 24 October 2011 12:56, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com wrote:
We wouldn't need a lawyer to look at every case - ones where the
author has released it under a free license should be fine, for
example.
Not remotely. Even at the most basic you would have the whole Freedom
of panorama
On 24 October 2011 17:48, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com wrote:
Nobody disputes the facts regarding the image of
Mickey Mouse, but we don't know the relevant law.
We do know the relevant law its just unclear what it actually means.
The interplay with commons policy is also an issue. For
15 matches
Mail list logo
