On 20 December 2011 01:16, Tom Morris t...@tommorris.org wrote:
Under your metric, in this scenario, the edits of a sysop and an
experienced user, or later the WikiProject editors, would not be
chosen as the high-quality stable version.
Yao did in fact mention that other factors would need
On 12/19/2011 11:38 PM, Yao Ziyuan wrote:
Hi Wikipedians,
I seem to have found a way to automatically judge which revision of a
Wikipedia article has the best quality.
It's very simple: look at that article's edit history and find out, within
a specified time range (e.g. the past 6
--
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 6:38 AM, Yao Ziyuan yaoziy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Wikipedians,
I seem to have found a way to automatically judge which revision of a
Wikipedia article has the best quality.
It's very simple: look at that article's edit history
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Tobias
church.of.emacs...@googlemail.comwrote:
On 12/19/2011 11:38 PM, Yao Ziyuan wrote:
Hi Wikipedians,
I seem to have found a way to automatically judge which revision of a
Wikipedia article has the best quality.
It's very simple: look at that
2011/12/20 David Gerard dger...@gmail.com:
On 20 December 2011 01:16, Tom Morris t...@tommorris.org wrote:
Under your metric, in this scenario, the edits of a sysop and an
experienced user, or later the WikiProject editors, would not be
chosen as the high-quality stable version.
Yao did in
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 9:07 PM, WereSpielChequers
werespielchequ...@gmail.com wrote:
--
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 6:38 AM, Yao Ziyuan yaoziy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Wikipedians,
I seem to have found a way to automatically judge which revision of a
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:22 PM, Tomasz Ganicz polime...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/12/20 David Gerard dger...@gmail.com:
On 20 December 2011 01:16, Tom Morris t...@tommorris.org wrote:
Under your metric, in this scenario, the edits of a sysop and an
experienced user, or later the
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 14:55, Yao Ziyuan yaoziy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Tobias
church.of.emacs...@googlemail.comwrote:
On 12/19/2011 11:38 PM, Yao Ziyuan wrote:
Hi Wikipedians,
I seem to have found a way to automatically judge which revision of a
Wikipedia
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 14:55, Yao Ziyuan yaoziy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Tobias
church.of.emacs...@googlemail.comwrote:
On 12/19/2011 11:38 PM, Yao Ziyuan wrote:
Hi Wikipedians,
I seem to have found a way to automatically judge which revision of a
Wikipedia
Hey everyone,
Since folks have been asking about it, I wanted to announce that the
features development team at the Wikimedia Foundation will be holding an
office hours (in #wikimedia-office) about the general past, present, and
future of MediaWiki features being worked on here at the WMF.
This
Welcome, wish you best,
Mardetanha
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Sue Gardner sgard...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
***Resending this note because the earlier version seemed to have
really broken formatting. Hope this is better.***
Hello folks,
I’m delighted to tell you that the Wikimedia
11 matches
Mail list logo
