But Muhammad's image is not illegal in the US, so why remove them? That has
no point. Why do we have to remove content perfectly legal under US law?
Please educate me why.
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Peter Coombe thewub.w...@googlemail.comwrote:
We already remove images of children which
deletion criteria is illegal, etc.
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Platonides platoni...@gmail.com wrote:
Mikemoral wrote:
But Muhammad's image is not illegal in the US, so why remove them? That
has
no point. Why do we have to remove content perfectly legal under US law?
Please educate me
