. My experience on Wikiquote
has been unfavorable, to put it mildly, where the en.wiki concept of BLP is
non-existent.
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 14:42:41 +1000
From: jay...@gmail.com
To: foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] New Project Process
The policies of each
, that change would be quite good. My experience on
Wikiquote has been unfavorable, to put it mildly, where the en.wiki concept
of BLP is non-existent.
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 14:42:41 +1000
From: jay...@gmail.com
To: foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] New Project Process
-l] New Project Process
The policies of each project are different for a very good reason.
e.g. If English Wikiquote was merged into English Wikipedia, the vast
majority of the quote pages would be deleted very quickly, for good or
ill. I know I would be the first to get out the sickle. :P
Hoi,
The WikiData project is at first very much technical. Software is developed
and as the software gains a certain level of maturity, a community will
start to grow. This community will slowly but surely become integrated with
other Wikimedia projects.
At this stage all eyes are on Wikipedia
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Jürgen Fenn
schneeschme...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 3. April 2012 22:22 schrieb Samuel Klein sjkl...@hcs.harvard.edu:
I would like to add another option: Who not merge all projects into
Wikipedia proper? The lack in participation in the sister projects is
Hi,
Le 5 avril 2012 05:04, Jürgen Fenn schneeschme...@googlemail.com a écrit :
Am 3. April 2012 22:22 schrieb Samuel Klein sjkl...@hcs.harvard.edu:
Ziko:
what would a WMF evaluation of Wikinews or Wikispecies say? Should we shut
down such
a project... cease to mention it on Wikipedia main
I totally second SJ's poke for more new projects! Although our flagship
project is highly successful, it would be good if we try to keep creating
new communities. I have been sad for quite a while now that we don't create
new projects any more. It would be great to see one new project every year
Am 3. April 2012 22:22 schrieb Samuel Klein sjkl...@hcs.harvard.edu:
Ziko:
what would a WMF evaluation of Wikinews or Wikispecies say? Should we shut
down such
a project... cease to mention it on Wikipedia main pages... or invest money
in promoting it?
Good questions, subtle answers.
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Lodewijk lodew...@effeietsanders.org wrote:
I totally second SJ's poke for more new projects! Although our flagship
project is highly successful, it would be good if we try to keep creating
new communities. I have been sad for quite a while now that we don't
I would love to see two specific proposals taken up.
One is The Wikipedia Journal as discussed here
http://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposal:Journal_%28A_peer-review_journal_to_allow/encourage_academics_to_write_Wikipedia_articles%29
Currently
working on corporate partners for this.
And the
Hi everyone, I'm new on the list and this is my fist email, but I've been
reading for a while(I'm from es.wiki). I support what Jürgen said, Most of
the Wikimedia projects are not very popular (with the exception of
Wikipedia and maybe commons). I talk about what I've read and listened to
people
The policies of each project are different for a very good reason.
e.g. If English Wikiquote was merged into English Wikipedia, the vast
majority of the quote pages would be deleted very quickly, for good or
ill. I know I would be the first to get out the sickle. :P
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 2:22
Samuel Klein, 03/04/2012 06:40:
- a global list of areas needing free knowledge, and how far we are
as a society towards reaching that goal
We had started a stub table about this:
https://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/List_of_things_that_need_to_be_free
Nemo
Hello,
Interesting. Please allow me to second that with the proposal to
reconsider existing projects. For example, what would a WMF evaluation
of Wikinews or Wikispecies say? Should we shut down such a project, or
at least cease to mention it on Wikipedia main pages? Or invest money
in promoting
On 3 April 2012 07:47, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com wrote:
We had started a stub table about this:
https://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/List_of_things_that_need_to_be_free
This is brilliant! I've been after something like this for a while.
- d.
On 3 April 2012 06:50, Ziko van Dijk vand...@wmnederland.nl wrote:
Hello,
Interesting. Please allow me to second that with the proposal to
reconsider existing projects. For example, what would a WMF evaluation
of Wikinews or Wikispecies say? Should we shut down such a project, or
at least
On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 08:47:45 +0200, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
Samuel Klein, 03/04/2012 06:40:
- a global list of areas needing free knowledge, and how far we
are
as a society towards reaching that goal
We had started a stub table about this:
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 2:47 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com wrote:
Samuel Klein, 03/04/2012 06:40:
- a global list of areas needing free knowledge, and how far we are
as a society towards reaching that goal
We had started a stub table about this:
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Samuel Klein sjkl...@hcs.harvard.edu wrote:
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:38 AM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 April 2012 07:47, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com wrote:
We had started a stub table about this:
With the launch of the WikiData effort, I am reminded that we should
return to our early willingness to experiment with new project ideas.
This means both starting new types of projects (like commons, like
wikidata!) and closing / archiving / spinning off projects (like the
sep11 wiki).
Two
20 matches
Mail list logo
