For wiki-style collaboration I usually use either PBWiki (or pbworks,
whatever, it's all the sme company) or sites.google.com
Both allow for FREE, private, multi-user, instant, online collaboration
using a free online smart editing engine. Same as Wikipedia.
And the results of that
I've found a shared Google Doc surprisingly usable in practice. (Even
shows changes in slightly-behind-real-time!) Lacks history, though.
- d.
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
For wiki-style collaboration I usually use either PBWiki (or pbworks,
whatever, it's all the sme company) or sites.google.com
Both allow for FREE, private, multi-user, instant, online collaboration
using a free online smart editing engine. Same as Wikipedia.
And
On 7/21/10 4:39 AM, Cary Bass wrote:
On 7/20/2010 7:27 PM, James Heilman wrote:
Not sure were to ask this...
A group of 20 of us from Wikiproject Medicine are working on a paper to
explain the usage of Wikipedia to the medical community. We were working on
it in Google documents but they
There are a number of services offering you MediaWiki installations in the
cloud, where you can just get a MediaWiki, like Wikia or Referata. Both have a
free plan that may suite your needs.
Cheers,
Denny
On Jul 20, 2010, at 19:27, James Heilman wrote:
Not sure were to ask this...
A group
Not sure were to ask this...
A group of 20 of us from Wikiproject Medicine are working on a paper to
explain the usage of Wikipedia to the medical community. We were working on
it in Google documents but they have made some changes to their software
that makes it nearly unusable.
We wish to
On 7/20/2010 7:27 PM, James Heilman wrote:
Not sure were to ask this...
A group of 20 of us from Wikiproject Medicine are working on a paper to
explain the usage of Wikipedia to the medical community. We were working on
it in Google documents but they have made some changes to their software
