2009/5/7 Charlotte Webb charlottethew...@gmail.com:
I think David Gerard said human postings generally do not score above
2.0 unless their vocabulary suggests a background in SEO, then it's
higher.
I don't remember saying the second part, but yeah, most human-written
emails score below 2.0.
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 5:39 AM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
(We largely solved this on wikien-l by requiring membership to post at
all. This is less than ideal for absolute openness, but we floated the
idea on the list to no objection and it's made maintenance *way*
easier.)
Well,
Michael Bimmler wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
Why would you let this spam through?
No one approved it (see headers, there is no Approved-on line). But I
found a legacy entry in the Always accept posts from these
non-members filter for
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 9:37 PM, Michael Bimmler mbimm...@gmail.com wrote:
No one approved it (see headers, there is no Approved-on line). But I
found a legacy entry in the Always accept posts from these
non-members filter for anth...@wikimedia.org... Well, I removed that
line now, as Anthere
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
Why would you let this spam through?
No one approved it (see headers, there is no Approved-on line). But I
found a legacy entry in the Always accept posts from these
non-members filter for anth...@wikimedia.org... Well, I
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 3:31 AM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
Why would you let this spam through?
Someone let it through?
--
Alex
(User:Majorly)
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Al Tally majorly.w...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 3:31 AM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
Why would you let this spam through?
Someone let it through?
No.
--
Michael Bimmler
mbimm...@gmail.com
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Michael Bimmler mbimm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Al Tally majorly.w...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 3:31 AM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
Why would you let this spam through?
Someone let it through?
No.
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
Apologies if I sounded harsh in my original e-mail (I just re-read it now).
No worries, I didn't consider it harsh.
I received the e-mail from you Michael, not from the OP, so I assumed
it was forwarded from a non-member.
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 10:45 PM, Michael Bimmler mbimm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
Apologies if I sounded harsh in my original e-mail (I just re-read it now).
No worries, I didn't consider it harsh.
I received the e-mail from you
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 10:52 PM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
I mean from you to the list, but I only received the copy with your
reply, not the original. Hmm, no clue.
Check your spam folder. That's where it automatically went for me.
-Aude
-Chad
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Aude aude.w...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 10:52 PM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
I mean from you to the list, but I only received the copy with your
reply, not the original. Hmm, no clue.
Check your spam folder. That's where it
12 matches
Mail list logo
