Hi,
Tim Ney, GNOME Foundation a écrit :
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 16:05 +0200, Quim Gil wrote:
For some the GUADEC is an opportunity to meet, for others is a way to
get new contributors, for others is a way to get some money for the
Foundation, for others is a way to enhance a common vision of
On Mon, 2005-09-05 at 22:13 +0200, David Neary wrote:
I would like to propose changing the name of GUADEC. There are many
reasons to do this, here are 5:
1. There is no link to GNOME in the name, or to being a conference
2. No-one knows what it means, which means the first question people
I don't think we should eliminate the enterprise or government outreach
aspects of GUADEC - think how important deployments like Extremadura
have been (or should have been). However I think we should focus that
outreach to take advantage of our strengths.
In that way, enterprises and/or
On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 09:58 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
On Mon, 2005-09-05 at 22:13 +0200, David Neary wrote:
I would like to propose changing the name of GUADEC. There are many
reasons to do this, here are 5:
1. There is no link to GNOME in the name, or to being a conference
2. No-one
On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 10:05 +0100, Bill Haneman wrote:
I don't think we should eliminate the enterprise or government outreach
aspects of GUADEC - think how important deployments like Extremadura
have been (or should have been). However I think we should focus that
outreach to take
Hey,
On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 16:24 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
The tabulated results for the surveys we collected at the last session
at GUADEC are now available at:
http://gnome.org/~otaylor/2005-guadec-survey.html
Thanks to Jonathan and Tim for help entering the surveys.
Apologies for
