Hello all,
I'd like to express my opinion.
I've been following the messages and it seems clear why the solicitation
to reduce the board it's been talking But I can't understand why this
has to be chosen for the next election.
I see that, as said before, if there was a clear definition of the
Minutes of the Board meeting 2005 Oct 26
Attendance:
===
Owen Taylor (chairing)
Tim Ney
Jonathan Blandford
Federico Mena-Quintero
Murray Cumming
Miguel de Icaza
Christian Schaller
Regrets:
Daniel Veillard
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 15:31 +0700, Ross Golder wrote:
On ศ., 2005-10-28 at 15:07 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
Perhaps we should look at the idea of running training sessions where
the trainers are not paid, but are given plane tickets and board in the
city they are sent to.
I'd rather
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 03:38:15PM +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
On Fri, October 28, 2005 00:21, Olav Vitters wrote:
I suggest to keep the official candidates and the amount of candidates
secret until after the nomination deadline. Candidates can of course
announce their candidacy publicly,
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 12:12 -0300, Fernando San Martín Woerner wrote:
Also i want to remember GNOME Hackers training meetings in Chile as for
us is very hard to get some core hacker from GNOME in our country we
started a small meetings just to show how to be involved in GNOME,
actually we've
Both Jim and Nat make very good points. I've been
saying this all along - We're expecting things from
this board that no other non-profit group in my
experience expects - and I have worked with dozens of
non-profit organizations.
Boards of non-profits:
-give legitimacy to the organization
reduce the peer pressure effect - in passing the referendum, the
community recognised that peer pressure was capable of playing a role in
who people voted for. I believe that this referendum is a compliment to
that one - it will require people to be more thoughtful with their vote.
Another
Hey,
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 13:50 +0200, Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller
wrote:
Minutes of the Board meeting 2005 Oct 26
Actions completed:
==
ACTION: Federico to take the task to find documentation authors and
get it
Boards of non-profits:
-give legitimacy to the organization
-provide an overall direction for the organization
-liaise with other organizations
-HELP RAISE MONEY
This is all good, and right on the mark, except for one thing. The
GNOME Foundation (and GNOME itself) is only accidentally
On Sat, 2005-10-29 at 11:22 +1300, John Williams wrote:
Boards of non-profits:
-give legitimacy to the organization
-provide an overall direction for the organization
-liaise with other organizations
-HELP RAISE MONEY
This is all good, and right on the mark, except for one thing.
Le vendredi 28 octobre 2005 à 19:16 +0200, Claudio Saavedra a écrit :
Hi,
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 17:23 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
[...]
I'm not saying we should block the media. I'm saying that we should try
to let each candidate be able to use the same way to express themselves,
If the board's role were limited to raising funds, who would
be responsible for important policy decisions?
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
Hi,
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 18:37 -0400, Tim Ney, GNOME Foundation wrote:
The doc project with Shaun McCance was announced at the end of the
Summit, but everyone was probably too tired to blog it. Below is the
draft outline of the project.
tim
SUBJECT MATTER DESCRIPTION:
On Sat, 2005-10-29 at 01:12 -0400, Richard M. Stallman wrote:
If the board's role were limited to raising funds, who would
be responsible for important policy decisions?]
Depends what you mean by 'policy decisions' - but I'd certainly hope the
GNOME Foundation membership had a large say in the
14 matches
Mail list logo
