El dj 01 de 06 del 2006 a les 10:51 -0500, en/na Shaun McCance va
escriure:
there tends to
be a reasonably high percentage of women in technical jobs
that aren't necessarily programming (though they may involve
some programming), such as project management, tech writing,
graphic design, and
The 3rd International GPLv3 Conference: Takes place in CCCB, Barcelona,
Spain, June 22nd 23rd!
The venue has now been confirmed as Aula 1, Centre de Cultura
Contemporanea (CCCB).www.cccb.org/
Important information especially to those of you who are going to this
years GUADEC and have not yet
On Mon, 5 Jun 2006, Anne [ISO-8859-1] �stergaard wrote:
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 15:42:04 +0200
From: Anne [ISO-8859-1] �stergaard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: foundation-list@gnome.org
Subject: Temporaray enlargement of the GNOME Board with 2 persons
Hello all GNOME Foundation Members,
About the
Well, I think it should be three people. Those two guys, and me :)
Seriously though, you can't arbitrarilly pick two people and not expect
everyone else to be arbitrarilly picked.
On Mon, 5 Jun 2006, Alan Horkan wrote:
The way I always thought of the purpose of the referendum was that it
Well, I think it should be three people. Those two guys, and me :)
Seriously though, you can't arbitrarilly pick two people and not expect
everyone else to be arbitrarilly picked.
It doesn't seem to be entirely arbitrary. The 3 appointees were the
next 3 highest vote-getters in the 2005
On 6/5/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I think it should be three people. Those two guys, and me :)
Seriously though, you can't arbitrarilly pick two people and not expect
everyone else to be arbitrarilly picked.
It doesn't look at all arbitrary to me. Behdad and
On Mon, 2006-05-06 at 13:21 -0400, Dominic Lachowicz wrote:
Well, I think it should be three people. Those two guys, and me :)
Seriously though, you can't arbitrarilly pick two people and not expect
everyone else to be arbitrarilly picked.
It doesn't seem to be entirely arbitrary. The
man, 05 06 2006 kl. 17:52 +0100, skrev Alan Horkan:
On Mon, 5 Jun 2006, Anne [ISO-8859-1] stergaard wrote:
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 15:42:04 +0200
From: Anne [ISO-8859-1] stergaard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: foundation-list@gnome.org
Subject: Temporaray enlargement of the GNOME Board with 2
man, 05 06 2006 kl. 12:08 -0500, skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Well, I think it should be three people. Those two guys, and me :)
Seriously though, you can't arbitrarilly pick two people and not expect
everyone else to be arbitrarilly picked.
OK these two persons were next on the list of
On Mon, 5 Jun 2006, Anne ?stergaard wrote:
man, 05 06 2006 kl. 12:08 -0500, skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Well, I think it should be three people. Those two guys, and me :)
Seriously though, you can't arbitrarilly pick two people and not expect
everyone else to be arbitrarilly picked.
OK these
man, 05 06 2006 kl. 20:07 +0300, skrev Baris Cicek:
Anne you better also send this mail to foundation-announce because every
foundation member might not be subscribed here, but they do to
foundation-announce.
I will do so.
Also I wonder why Board need to enlarge its size, but instead asking
Hi Andrew,
Andreas J. Guelzow wrote:
On Mon, 2006-05-06 at 13:21 -0400, Dominic Lachowicz wrote:
New seats on the board may be made available as the project grows,
subject to approval by the board or referendum of the membership.
Between elections, board vacancies or new board slots shall
On Mon, 2006-05-06 at 21:54 +0200, David Neary wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Andreas J. Guelzow wrote:
On Mon, 2006-05-06 at 13:21 -0400, Dominic Lachowicz wrote:
New seats on the board may be made available as the project grows,
subject to approval by the board or referendum of the membership.
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As for getting people involved, perhaps posting to this list? I realize
it's hard to find tasks that someone might be able to pick up and do,
but it is usually worthwhile in the end. Perhaps a TODO list on
live.gnome.org of things that the board is planning on
On 6/5/06, David Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Andreas J. Guelzow wrote:
So, the board can decide how many people it wants to have elected and
then it can add an arbitrary number of additional members after the
election. Why do we have elections in the first place?
The board must have
Hi,
David Neary wrote:
Hi,
Andreas J. Guelzow wrote:
So, the board can decide how many people it wants to have elected and
then it can add an arbitrary number of additional members after the
election. Why do we have elections in the first place?
The board must have at least 7 people. Aside
On 06/06/06, Dominic Lachowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I think it should be three people. Those two guys, and me :)
Seriously though, you can't arbitrarilly pick two people and not expect
everyone else to be arbitrarilly picked.
It doesn't seem to be entirely arbitrary. The 3
quote who=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
But, they can't be members of the board without an election.
Just want to point out that, yes, they can be - please read the Foundation
by-laws. The board can change the size of the board at will, and nominate
members at will.
The referendum process was not done
quote who=Anne Østergaard
The Board would like to propose to you a temporary enlargement of the
board with two persons: Behdad Esfahbod and Germán Poó-Caamaño.
My personal opinion on this, as stated to the board:
* We made our bed with the one-two-punch combination of change in board
19 matches
Mail list logo
