Hey all,
Just a reminder that the GNOME Foundation Members meeting will be on at 5pm
Monday 16th July (TODAY!).
The board is going to present a year in review of what we've currently done, and
what plans we have for the future. Soon after, we'll be opening it up for
discussion on where we need
Hi all,
As some of you have noticed, I'm not at GUADEC this year. The reason is
a happy one - Anne is going to be giving birth sometime over the next
couple of weeks (I'll keep ye posted).
The combination of the arrival of a third child, and a change in role at
work over the past few weeks,
Congrats on becoming father third time! Thank you for all the hard work
you put in
as a Board member :)
Does this also implies there is a going to be by-election (first one
ever) :) ?
-Ghee
Dave Neary wrote:
Hi all,
As some of you have noticed, I'm not at GUADEC this year. The reason is
a
quote who=Ghee Teo
Does this also implies there is a going to be by-election (first one
ever) :) ?
No, according to the GNOME Foundation by-laws, the Board may appoint a new
director in the case of a vacancy (which we did last year under the same
circumstances).
- Jeff
--
GUADEC 2007 in
On Mon, 2007-07-16 at 13:22 +0100, Jeff Waugh wrote:
No, according to the GNOME Foundation by-laws, the Board may appoint a
new director in the case of a vacancy
This is standard practice in the not-for-profit world (lest you be
worried that this is somehow unusual or improper)
AfC
Birmingham
On Sat, 2007-07-14 at 17:50 -0400, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
If a long standard is part of an attack, we can use that for our own
purposes.
In this case I suspect that the length of the standard is largely a
consequence of the format being an XML serialization of the existing
complex and
