These people are irritating ... three spams from the same group. They
shot themselves in the foot in the third paragraph with the twenty
minutes IMHO.
Can I suggest that the Board complains to these guys for hassling our
contributors - and/or is this sanctioned - I assume it must
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 21:02 -0400, Richard Stallman wrote:
It might be generally useful to do something to help GNOME
contributors meet up based on where they live. We do so much in
cyberspace, in which a person's geographical location is irrelevant,
that come the day when geographical
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 11:21 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
It would be better if GNOME defined a precise set of rules (ie. don't
mention religion).
And you might know - I rather liked Lefty's random talk on his buddhist
pilgrimage at the last GUADEC, but Aaron's bacon-fest horribly
Hi Murray,
On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 10:54 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
My concern is that code without a copyright holder cannot really be
under any license.
This is a very frequently made point; of course - IANAL. But if you
follow this argument to it's logical conclusion this makes all
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 15:38 +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
Dave Neary wrote:
A small correction to explain exactly how random transfers work:
In count 1, Vincent has 60 votes, they're shoved into a stack. The top
33 votes from the stack get redistributed in count 2.
So the phrase vote
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 10:11 +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
You just announced the results based on first-past-the-post, when the
elections were to be run using preferential voting, with single
transferable vote and fractional surplus transfer.
Ah ! the famous 'Meek' method (no relation);
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 19:43 +0100, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
NNB. don't believe everything you read ;-) particularly in this area.
Specially from people who work for a company that is strategically
aligned with Microsoft.
1stly that's the purest nonsense :-) Novell competes
Hi Richard,
I was interested by your mail:
On Sat, 2007-07-07 at 16:48 -0400, Richard Stallman wrote:
The 2006 Microsoft patent policy does not eliminate the patent
obstacles to implementing OOXML. See
