On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 01:22:00AM +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 02:02:49AM +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 12:44:52AM +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
Don't cry about people who criticize the Foundation's unconditional
support
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 04:50:32PM +0200, Lucas Rocha wrote:
7) New HDDs for buildbot machine
The buildbot machine (build.gnome.org) had a very small HDD (32GB)
and needed new ones. The board agreed on buying new HDDs for
build.gnome.org as requested by Olav Vitters on October 8. Owen
On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 12:07:27PM -0500, Thomas Thurman wrote:
I did send this email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
foundation-list@gnome.org, but in a conversation a short while later I
was convinced that I could best help the Foundation by not being on
the BoD; I cancelled the foundation-list
On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 09:36:20PM -0300, Fernando San Martín Woerner wrote:
I have uploaded this iCal file with the 2007 Board of Directors Election
schedule.
http://traza.googlecode.com/files/elections2007.ics
Please put it on a GNOME site, see foundation-web module in
svn.gnome.org.
--
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 04:17:05PM -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
The idea and board's decision was transcribed in board meeting minutes
and sent to this least a few months ago. A mild discussion started and
there was no strong opposition to the membership. I don't think just
because a fool
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 04:42:03PM -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
Bringing it back to the present, there's stuff on svn.mugshot.org that
really belongs on gnome.org, but it seems it didn't end up there. I
don't think this was a conscious thing, but I think it probably was
due to just enough of
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 08:29:35AM +0300, Kalle Vahlman wrote:
2007/9/8, Olav Vitters [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 04:47:31PM +0300, Kalle Vahlman wrote:
And this all is naturally from the developer/maintainer POV, as
translators and documentors do not benefit from
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 03:05:18PM -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
On Sat, 2007-09-08 at 10:17 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
Hi, Olav,
You are ignoring the central place. You need somewhere all GNOME devs
are able to commit. This is what is so wrong about
www.gnome.org/~foo/git
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 05:23:28PM -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 16:21 -0400, Claudio Saavedra wrote:
That's the way things are handled ATM. With the exception that only Jeff
is supposed to commit to the appropriate file (there's a README or
HACKING somewhere
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 10:35:55PM -0400, Kevin Kubasik wrote:
While I don't wish to sound trite, I do think almost everyone here
knows what everyone else is going to say, and maybe trying to
headstart the discussion is a bad move, and presumptuous, but allow me
to throw out an idea.
I
CVS) (D-)SCM evolve. Before GNOME is
ready to switch a lot of development will have happened in the various
tools. So if Git had Windows as a priority, I'd expect Windows to be
solved soon enough.
Another point for SVN is that everything seems to integrate with it.
On 9/8/07, Olav Vitters [EMAIL
On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 04:47:31PM +0300, Kalle Vahlman wrote:
2007/9/8, Olav Vitters [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 05:56:38AM -0400, Kevin Kubasik wrote:
Let's summarize it as: I don't know any D-SCM :-) (only investigate by
checking out docs)
(but I am also not interested
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 11:57:19AM +0300, Zeeshan Ali wrote:
About the svn access, all centralized VCS's are meant for
dictatorships. If the gnome foundation really wants to improve the
situation, i recommend moving to git or some other non-distributed VCS
instead of brain-dead centralized
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 11:19:49PM +0200, Damien Sandras wrote:
You probably know that I started contributing to GNOME in my spare time
back in 2000. I have dedicated countless hours to my project,
GnomeMeeting, now known as Ekiga. It means 7 years of development,
exclusively done during
the component. Bugzilla is there to assist. It makes no
sense to have components/products that the maintainer doesn't look at.
This even if I think it would add transparency.
--- Comment #1 from Olav Vitters 2007-08-20 21:37 UTC ---
Jeff is also a GNOME sysadmin (see
http
On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 12:05:59PM +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
Meanwhile, our sysadmins seem overworked, causing understandable delays
for simple requests. Now seems like a good time to pay someone so that
requests for new accounts, mailing lists, bugzilla products, etc, get
done almost
On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 05:45:56AM +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
quote who=Olav Vitters
Mailing list setup is broken. Hiring someone to figure it all out might be
a good idea; because currently I do not setup mailing lists just because I
do not want to figure out how.
I studied the broken
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 05:50:53PM +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 20:04 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 19:43 +0100, Danilo Šegan wrote:
Today at 18:44, Murray Cumming wrote:
But yes, I'll try the endorsement strategy if I have to.
I
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 07:27:27PM +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 18:53 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
I signed the code of conduct under the strict condition that there is no
official enforcement of these principles, and that it should not be
interpreted like a legal
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 11:57:09PM +, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
radically changed since. Mailing lists are strange,
alien places to people who don't come from hacker
culture. The same goes for IRC. When you finally
Small question: I saw one or two suggestions to force GNOME developers
to not
(Wanted to leave this to others, but oh well)
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 05:37:29PM +, Alan Horkan wrote:
[..]
I cannot really speak to your other requests but I'd say the only problem
there will be finding administrators with the time and energy available to
help you out.
- Mirroring
(made CC-list a bit smaller)
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 08:52:53PM +0200, Juha Siltala wrote:
- Access to the Bugzilla database
Bugzilla is public, and I've been able to get all the data I want.
Just a warning to everyone reading this: Having public access does not
mean it is ok to write
On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 01:41:44AM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
Olav Vitters wrote:
FWIW, I did see 2 requests to rename 'Linux' on bugzilla.gnome.org
to GNU/Linux. My official position is 'people use that field?!?'
(except crazy GIMP developers; which is the only reason you can
still see
On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 12:53:56AM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
Shaun McCance wrote:
For those curious, many of this was discussed in the thread on
gnome-doc-list, starting here:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-doc-list/2006-July/msg00200.html
That's right; I gave a link to the
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 11:19:04PM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
This is a request to the the GNOME Foundation Board for
action/decision regarding this matter.
There are some strings in some GNOME programs and very few in the
GNOME documentaion that refer to the operating system as Linux. We
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 12:07:14PM -0400, Dominic Lachowicz wrote:
You have said that the CoC isn't and wasn't 'rules' and claimed to
have added this point to the Wiki page on June 2nd.[1] I don't think
that your June 2nd change [2] actually says that this isn't and
wasn't rules, and what you
101 - 126 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
