On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 4:43 AM, john
palmierijohn.j5.palmi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Quim Gil quim...@gmail.com wrote:
So I guess there is no way back.
Speaking clearly, I wonder what weight in people's opinions (in the
polls and the board meembers) had the Qt
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 2:31 AM, Quim Gil quim...@gmail.com wrote:
conference in one go. Also why the Linux Foundation (Gold in GUADEC
2008) didn't come back in the Summit? Was this a consequence of the
co-location or would have happened anyway with the Global Crisis? And
Intel, and ARM...?
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 10:36 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Philip Van Hoofpvanh...@gnome.org wrote:
[CUT]
You can see that in all configurations the majority want to co-locate
next year. Even if it means not having a profit.
Can you elaborate why the
[taking foundation-announce out of the cc: fields]
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Srinivasa Ragavansraga...@gnome.org wrote:
[snippet]
The main, and most important, reason for not wanting to co-locate
next year is because the GNOME community needs to focus on GNOME 3.0,
and next year's
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 17:05 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Philip Van Hoofpvanh...@gnome.org wrote:
It was a hard decision because, there is real interest in making KDE
and GNOME work well together. While this is also an important goal,
but we don't need
On 08/12/2009 09:22 AM, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
Maybe if the foundation's board would more clearly articulate why
exactly we can't do a co-located event*next* year, they'll convince the
community about their decision? Why didn't they?
My personal view as a board member:
Individual board
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Quim Gilquim...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually many GNOME people that was not enthusiastic about a second
joint summit mentioned that one of the problems was that the agenda
didn't help meeting peers with similar interests from the other side.
Something that could
On 08/12/2009 04:08 PM, Quim Gil wrote:
Speaking clearly, I wonder what weight in people's opinions (in the
polls and the board meembers) had the Qt branding in badge, towel,
roll-up ad in the main entrance, etc. Many GNOME people said they
didn't felt 'at home' in such context. But that is
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Quim Gil quim...@gmail.com wrote:
So I guess there is no way back.
Speaking clearly, I wonder what weight in people's opinions (in the
polls and the board meembers) had the Qt branding in badge, towel,
roll-up ad in the main entrance, etc. Many GNOME people
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 6:31 PM, john
palmierijohn.j5.palmi...@gmail.com wrote:
[snipping out parts of an well thought out response]
To sum it all up - fools rush in. We really need to take a step back and
really try to understand what we wish to accomplish in another co-located
event given
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Philip Van Hoofpvanh...@gnome.org wrote:
Majority wants to co-locate next year
* 55% collaborated with a KDE /GNOME person, 29% did not
You can see that in all configurations the majority want to co-locate
next year. Even if it means not having a profit.
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 15:09 -0600, Stormy Peters wrote:
Here are the survey results with a summary I did initially.
Note that this was a survey, not a vote.
Sure,
But if a majority of the responders in all configurations picked that
they want to co-locate next year, even if it means no
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 4:08 AM, Philip Van Hoofpvanh...@gnome.org wrote:
You can see that in all configurations the majority want to co-locate
next year. Even if it means not having a profit.
Can you elaborate why the board didn't first discuss this decision with
the community?
I was also
This year's Gran Canaria Desktop Summit represented the first time the
GNOME and KDE communities have co-located their annual conferences in
the same location. 852 free software advocates from 46 countries
gathered together last week to discuss and enhance the free desktop
experience at the first
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 17:10 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
The cooperation and conversations that began between
the KDE and GNOME communities will continue into the future and in
events like hackfests throughout the year, but next year the conferences
will be hosted separately.
Apologizes for
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Philip Van Hoofpvanh...@gnome.org wrote:
Apologizes for asking.
When was the community consulted about this decision?
There was a survey request on the foundation list about the opinion
from the members.
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 21:06 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Philip Van Hoofpvanh...@gnome.org wrote:
Apologizes for asking.
When was the community consulted about this decision?
There was a survey request on the foundation list about the opinion
from the
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:37 AM, Philip Van Hoofpvanh...@gnome.org wrote:
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 21:06 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Philip Van Hoofpvanh...@gnome.org wrote:
Apologizes for asking.
When was the community consulted about this decision?
There
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 15:09 -0600, Stormy Peters wrote:
Of the GNOME people who collaborated with a KDE person:
* 78% said it went well, 7% said it didn't
* 67% said we should co-locate next year, 29% said no
* 28% said we should co-locate in the future but not next year, 25%
said no
* 53%
19 matches
Mail list logo
