Is this the EULA that you're referring to?
http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/legal/eula/firefox-en.html
Yes. It is quite clearly a non-free license.
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 17:14 -0500, Hubert Figuiere wrote:
[Is Sun's Java 1.6] Free (as Libre) Software?
No.
(It is at least now redistributable, which allowed the likes of
Debian to ship it in non-free. Progress)
You may, however, be interested to hear that a new project has
Firefox 3.0 will use Breakpad instead of that talkback software. At one
point the build included both for testing reasons. However, in the
current nightly it appears that talkback is not included (I know it
wasn't used for a while).
Is Breakpad free? If so, that is good news --
On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 10:38:28PM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
Is Breakpad free? If so, that is good news -- one of the two problems
is solved.
Breakpad is distributed under the modified BSD licence (i.e. without the
advertising clause). See http://code.google.com/p/google-breakpad/
and
In working with the Mozilla Foundation, we need to keep in mind that
the Firefox binaries released by the Mozilla foundation are non-free.
Originally this was true for two different reasons:
1. These binaries included the Talkback module for which
source was not released at all. (Mozilla does
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 04:33:38PM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
I heard that work was under way developing a free replacement for
Talkback. I do not know where this work stands now. In any case, we
need to be careful not to recommend the non-free Firefox binaries,
unless both problems have
On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 23:02 +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
Whjile I disagree with Mozilla's trademark policy for precisely its
affect on the free software development community, their policy is not
incompatible with Firefox as free software, in the same way as Sun's
policy concerning Java does not
Hi Richard,
Richard Stallman wrote:
I heard that work was under way developing a free replacement for
Talkback. I do not know where this work stands now. In any case, we
need to be careful not to recommend the non-free Firefox binaries,
unless both problems have been solved.
Talkback bas
GNOME Foundation and Mozilla Foundation join forces
===
The GNOME Foundation and the Mozilla Foundation announced today that
they will increase their collaboration to improve developer support and
user experience of desktop applications on GNU/Linux
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 10:13:38PM +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
* Mozilla reaffirms its commitment to integrating with the GNOME
platform for the XUL development platform, and for Mozilla Firefox.
a) This sounds nifty.
b) What will this mean for Ephy?
peace
T
--
Thomas Thurman,
Hi,
Thomas Thurman wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 10:13:38PM +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
* Mozilla reaffirms its commitment to integrating with the GNOME
platform for the XUL development platform, and for Mozilla Firefox.
a) This sounds nifty.
b) What will this mean for Ephy?
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 4:38 PM, Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There may come a day when Epiphany's reason for being (a web browser
well integrated into GNOME) with go away, and Firefox will naturally be
the default on all distros. That day may never arrive.
/me cries a bit.
--
Og B.
12 matches
Mail list logo
