Re: Some perspective on the relative importannce of the board.

2005-10-30 Thread Jim Gettys
Another function of the board at the moment, is as an appeals court of last resort, though we've always delegated to the release management process. This function, though (hopefully) rarely used, is very important when serious disputes arise. - Jim On Fri, 2005-10-28 at

Re: Some perspective on the relative importannce of the board.

2005-10-30 Thread Nat Friedman
Yeah, and the board is supposed to be able to make sweeping policy decisions, though the notion that the board doesn't get involved in any technical policy making has sometimes undermined this ability of the board. Anyway, what's important is what the board does *not* do, which is work. The

Re: Some perspective on the relative importannce of the board.

2005-10-30 Thread Quim Gil
How much time do you think a director should dedicate to board tasks in order to be efficient? Please suggest an estimate of [minimum - average] hours par week or month. Humans are not robots and efficiency doesn't rely only in time. But factors related to 'lack of time for the board tasks' have

Re: Some perspective on the relative importannce of the board.

2005-10-30 Thread Glynn Foster
Hey, On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 19:25 -0500, Jeff Waugh wrote: quote who=Quim Gil How much time do you think a director should dedicate to board tasks in order to be efficient? Please suggest an estimate of [minimum - average] hours par week or month. Because getting things done

Re: Some perspective on the relative importannce of the board.

2005-10-29 Thread Murray Cumming
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 17:07 -0400, Jeff Waugh wrote: quote who=Leslie Proctor I agree, since Tim's been the one who has been collect the advisory board fees, finding new sponsors and board members, etc. The board has had little to do with raising money to date. In quite a few cases,

Re: Some perspective on the relative importannce of the board.

2005-10-29 Thread Murray Cumming
On Sat, 2005-10-29 at 18:49 +1300, Glynn Foster wrote: On Sat, 2005-10-29 at 01:12 -0400, Richard M. Stallman wrote: If the board's role were limited to raising funds, who would be responsible for important policy decisions?] Depends what you mean by 'policy decisions' - but I'd certainly

Re: Some perspective on the relative importannce of the board.

2005-10-28 Thread Leslie Proctor
Both Jim and Nat make very good points. I've been saying this all along - We're expecting things from this board that no other non-profit group in my experience expects - and I have worked with dozens of non-profit organizations. Boards of non-profits: -give legitimacy to the organization

Re: Some perspective on the relative importannce of the board.

2005-10-28 Thread Richard M. Stallman
If the board's role were limited to raising funds, who would be responsible for important policy decisions? ___ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list

Re: Some perspective on the relative importannce of the board.

2005-10-28 Thread Glynn Foster
On Sat, 2005-10-29 at 01:12 -0400, Richard M. Stallman wrote: If the board's role were limited to raising funds, who would be responsible for important policy decisions?] Depends what you mean by 'policy decisions' - but I'd certainly hope the GNOME Foundation membership had a large say in the