Let's be very clear- we have a conference for hackers that interests
several hundred people, and we have a separate conference for business
and government that interests dozens, and there is very little overlap
between those two groups. I'm not clear why we continue to insist that
they be
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 00:11 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
On 9/8/05, Tim Ney, GNOME Foundation [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 09:34 +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
a large portion of the attendees were either completely uninterested
in the first two days, or completely
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 00:19 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
For 1/2 the cost, we could run summit-style (low-cost, high-fun)
events on every continent (including a big one in Europe as the
'mother ship'), and for 1/4 the cost, we could send a handful of GNOME
community leaders to every major
On 9/8/05, Tim Ney, GNOME Foundation [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 09:34 +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
a large portion of the attendees were either completely uninterested
in the first two days, or completely uninterested in the 3rd.
The evaluation forms submitted stated did
On 9/8/05, Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Tim Ney, GNOME Foundation a écrit :
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 16:05 +0200, Quim Gil wrote:
For some the GUADEC is an opportunity to meet, for others is a way to
get new contributors, for others is a way to get some money for the
Foundation,
Hi,
Tim Ney, GNOME Foundation a écrit :
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 16:05 +0200, Quim Gil wrote:
For some the GUADEC is an opportunity to meet, for others is a way to
get new contributors, for others is a way to get some money for the
Foundation, for others is a way to enhance a common vision of
I don't think we should eliminate the enterprise or government outreach
aspects of GUADEC - think how important deployments like Extremadura
have been (or should have been). However I think we should focus that
outreach to take advantage of our strengths.
In that way, enterprises and/or
On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 10:05 +0100, Bill Haneman wrote:
I don't think we should eliminate the enterprise or government outreach
aspects of GUADEC - think how important deployments like Extremadura
have been (or should have been). However I think we should focus that
outreach to take
Deciding what GUADEC is for is harder. Changing the name should be easy.
As you see is not that easy. :)
Also, what is most important about a change is not the fact of being
easy or harder, but being useful and worth to change.
I don't think it's worth deciding a change for GUADEC's name
That's a fair summary of what the board has discussed, as recently as
June. Jonathan Blandford once termed GUADEC as GNOME's mothership, an
annual place to meet and recharge batteries.
This is an insiders' point of view and this is possibly a reason why the
GUADEC satisfy generally insiders
10 matches
Mail list logo
