This section is quite broad, and is only modified by the somewhat vague
Fair Use section. Unfortunately, if taken literally, it would prevent
On Thu, July 28, 2011 4:24 pm, Alan Cox wrote:
The Fair Use section has another problem btw when someone is looking at
this. Fair Use has no meaning
I'm not the world's foremost expert in trademark law but I am a lawyer and
have worked in this area in my tenure at the Software Freedom Law Center.
The language that I proposed was reviewed in other contexts by other
lawyers at SFLC as well as lawyers at various companies that were involved
Le mercredi 27 juillet 2011, à 20:13 -0400, Karen Sandler a écrit :
This requirement is waived in all contexts where such marks are not
normally included, such as email, online discussion, package names,
non-graphical advertisements (when permitted), and academic papers.
We encourage the
This section is quite broad, and is only modified by the somewhat vague
Fair Use section. Unfortunately, if taken literally, it would prevent
The Fair Use section has another problem btw when someone is looking at
this. Fair Use has no meaning in most legal systems outside the USA.
I'm
On Thu, July 28, 2011 4:12 am, Vincent Untz wrote:
Le mercredi 27 juillet 2011, à 20:13 -0400, Karen Sandler a écrit :
This requirement is waived in all contexts where such marks are not
normally included, such as email, online discussion, package names,
non-graphical advertisements (when
Various people have pointed out that a part of the GNOME Foundation
Trademark Usage Guidelines for Third Parties could be improved.
The Guidelines are at: http://foundation.gnome.org/licensing/guidelines/
The section entitled Use Proper Notice of Trademark reads:
Identify GNOME Trademarks
