On Wed, 31 May 2006 16:44:03 -0400, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
GNOME is Free Software and part of the GNU project [...]
If the above statement is indeed true, I wonder where any misrepresentations
are, if they can be rectified and what can be done in general to improve
the overall
quote who=Yavor Doganov
If you read Planet GNOME and some of the mailing lists, you'll notice that
many developers use the term Open Source and call the operating system
Linux, instead of GNU or GNU/Linux. Some of them were even excited when
a popular non-free software was relicensed
ons, 31 05 2006 kl. 20:38 +0100, skrev Bill Haneman:
On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 19:25, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
Nobody will be driven away by that, people might be driven away by
us stating that you now are part of a community with a code of conduct.
Actually if persons are driven away by not
Anne wrote:
[snip]
I do not say this to start a new long debat in this tread. But it has
become obvious that the 1% participation of women in FLOSS is
embarrassing and we need to have a look at why this is the case and make
some cultural changes.
I know that the Computer Science Department
On 6/1/06, Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anne wrote:
[snip]
I do not say this to start a new long debat in this tread. But it has
become obvious that the 1% participation of women in FLOSS is
embarrassing and we need to have a look at why this is the case and make
some cultural
On Wed, 31 May 2006, Richard Stallman wrote:
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 15:13:33 -0400
From: Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: foundation-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: Code Of Conduct
So I would definitely agree that given an idea of contributing (code),
Hi,
Luis Villa wrote:
Such a plan should be written by someone who has actually been
involved in IRC, our mailing lists, bugzilla, etc., *as a developer*-
which, sorry, isn't Anne. It will not work if it is not driven by
someone with such experience.
That's not so. There's nothing
Actually, it should be someone who is able to detect possible obstacles
that put Asians or Women out of GNOME (or in general Free Software). I
doubt that anyone have any emprical study about that. But is it harsh
and rude behavior of developers or the community? Or technical limits?
Or even
tor, 01 06 2006 kl. 16:27 +0300, skrev Baris Cicek:
Actually, it should be someone who is able to detect possible obstacles
that put Asians or Women out of GNOME (or in general Free Software). I
doubt that anyone have any emprical study about that. But is it harsh
and rude behavior of
tor, 01 06 2006 kl. 08:13 -0400, skrev Luis Villa:
On 6/1/06, Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anne wrote:
[snip]
I do not say this to start a new long debat in this tread. But it has
become obvious that the 1% participation of women in FLOSS is
embarrassing and we need to
Ar Tue, May 30, 2006 at 01:04:43PM +0200, ysgrifennodd Murray Cumming:
I don't think we need a whole organisation to police it. At the least, it
should just be how we expect people to behave on mailing lists and IRC and
it could be up to the administrator of that list or channel to decide
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 13:23 +0200, Anne Østergaard wrote:
I have personally had the feeling over the past couple of years that the
general atmosphere in the GNOME community has hardened.
I don't think its has hardened as much as grown older. Going back 5
years we where 'all' in our early/mid
On Iau, 2006-06-01 at 14:33 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
Hmm, how about people working together? It just seems that the person who
most most obviously wants this should be the person trying to make it
happen.
I'd be wary of pursuing just the women in GNOME issue, because many of
the same
tor, 01 06 2006 kl. 18:57 +0200, skrev Murray Cumming:
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 14:57 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
On Iau, 2006-06-01 at 14:33 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
Hmm, how about people working together? It just seems that the person who
most most obviously wants this should be the person
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 22:21 +0200, Anne Østergaard wrote:
tor, 01 06 2006 kl. 18:57 +0200, skrev Murray Cumming:
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 14:57 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
[...]
Also if Code of Conduct is too strong then Expected Behaviour
perhaps. Personally I don't see a problem with Code of
Hi,
Anne Østergaard wrote:
tor, 01 06 2006 kl. 18:57 +0200, skrev Murray Cumming:
I think it is a natural step to take after the EU and FLOSSPOLS report
has shown that women are being excluded from the community.-
What I've seen shows that women are not participating in the community -
this
I think it is a natural step to take after the EU and FLOSSPOLS report
has shown that women are being excluded from the community.-
This rubs me the wrong way. It's not like we're actively working to
exclude women, Asians, or Martians from GNOME. Nor are we actively
trying to make GNOME a
quote who=Jeff Waugh
I think a fun way to deal with this criticism ('cos it's valid and
expected) is to actually make it a Very GNOMEy Code of Conduct. Let's not
beat around the bush - first point: Be Excellent to Each Other.
*guitar lick*
(added this point to the wiki page)
- Jeff
--
18 matches
Mail list logo
