Re: GNOME: lack of strategic roadmap

2010-03-02 Thread Stormy Peters
2010/3/2 Philip Van Hoof pvanh...@gnome.org Stop dragging the GNOME Foundation list down these off topic roads and stop this pissing contest. I think you, and many other people, are misinterpreting this as a pissing contest. It's not. It's a quite serious debate. And I think it's

Re: GNOME: lack of strategic roadmap

2010-03-02 Thread Philip Van Hoof
On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 17:39 -0700, Stormy Peters wrote: 2010/3/2 Philip Van Hoof pvanh...@gnome.org Stop dragging the GNOME Foundation list down these off topic roads and stop this pissing contest. I think you, and many other people, are misinterpreting

Re: GNOME: lack of strategic roadmap

2010-03-02 Thread Philip Van Hoof
On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 18:19 -0700, Stormy Peters wrote: Because you are being disruptive on the Foundation List. Again. That's your believe. Good for you. People are not interested in having this argument and you are causing people to unsubscribe to the Foundation List and to quit

Re: GNOME: lack of strategic roadmap

2010-03-02 Thread Andrew Cowie
On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 21:32 -0500, Richard Stallman wrote: At a technical level, I wish that GNOME made it easier to relate the visible GUI level to the underlying level of the command line As an aside, one thing I find myself doing a lot of is: $ cd ~/some/path $ command $ another Hm. This