On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Sébastien Wilmet swil...@gnome.org
wrote:
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 09:07:18PM +0200, Alexandre Franke wrote:
But we should stop guessing or making assumption now and wait for
someone from the travel committee or with the relevant knowledge about
that budget
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 01:17:04PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:54:44PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
I do believe GNOME Foundation should have a clear (and well documented)
way
for
On Tue, 2014-09-16 at 15:22 +0200, Sébastien Wilmet wrote:
- Writing a book, another actionable item.
My school told me to buy a Qt textbook when I was a freshman, even
though the class didn't involve Qt and we have zero Qt-related classes.
Simply having the book increased Qt's exposure. What if
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Sébastien Wilmet swil...@gnome.org wrote:
Alexandre pointed out that GUADEC is at the right time. But not every
OPW rounds are during the summer! So some OPW interns go to GUADEC
several months later than the round. So why not doing the same also for
GSoC and
It seems to me that this thread has turn into a series of counter arguments
with no specific direction.
Before we go ahead, can we please clarify:
a) What problem are we trying to solve.
and b) How is that problem a bigger problem that the one's we are solving
and whether that's a problem the
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Fabiano Fidêncio fabi...@fidencio.org wrote:
I do believe GNOME Foundation should have a clear (and well documented) way
for people raising their questions wrt how the GNOME Foundation's money is
spent.
I *do* understand it's keep private for security reasons
On 16 September 2014 16:09, Alexandre Franke alexandre.fra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Fabiano Fidêncio fabi...@fidencio.org
wrote:
I do believe GNOME Foundation should have a clear (and well documented) way
for people raising their questions wrt how the GNOME
On Tue, 2014-09-16 at 10:22 +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
So it's better to only have 15 students working on important things,
rather than having these 15 students, plus 10 others working on less
important things?
Nope! But maybe with a better selection process we could instead end up
with
On 09/16/2014 12:22 PM, Alexandre Franke wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 September 2014 16:09, Alexandre Franke alexandre.fra...@gmail.com
wrote:
http://www.gnome.org/foundation/reports/ is a bit outdated, but it exists.
minor
On 16 September 2014 17:44, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote:
hi Alexandre;
On 16 September 2014 17:22, Alexandre Franke alexandre.fra...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 September 2014 16:09, Alexandre Franke
On Tue, 2014-09-16 at 10:28 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Tue, 2014-09-16 at 16:07 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
I'm sure you're confusing me with somebody else. I don't live in the
US, I only work for a US company. I live in the UK.
Whoops; I was thinking that Endless is based in San
On 16 September 2014 11:33, Sébastien Wilmet swil...@gnome.org wrote:
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 09:07:18PM +0200, Alexandre Franke wrote:
But we should stop guessing or making assumption now and wait for
someone from the travel committee or with the relevant knowledge about
that budget to
On 16 September 2014 16:12, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 September 2014 16:09, Alexandre Franke alexandre.fra...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Fabiano Fidêncio fabi...@fidencio.org
wrote:
I do believe GNOME Foundation should have a clear (and well
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 03:16:26PM +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
it's also very much C-centered, whereas we want more people to use C
only for core library components.
A good practice for writing an application is to write the backend as an
internal library, so it can easily be used later by
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Hashem Nasarat hnasa...@gmail.com wrote:
Page 12 in the 2013 annual report
(http://www.gnome.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/GNOME-Annual-Report-2013.pdf)
has financial information for 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013. Is this not
what you're looking for?
No, it's
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 06:27:43PM +0100, Ekaterina Gerasimova wrote:
I have proposed to the board that a financial report should be
published every month as that will enable the membership to be better
informed. I am already presenting a financial report to the board on a
monthly basis, so it
Thank you very much for your answer, Kat.
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 06:12:15PM +0100, Ekaterina Gerasimova wrote:
interns attending events in 2014 were sponsored within allocated
travel budgets out of general funds or by sponsors for that event.
For the budget allocated for travel, would it be a
17 matches
Mail list logo
