Re: Question to GNOME Foundation Board candidates

On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Cosimo Cecchi wrote: > 3) About GNOME Executive Director, how do you think about GNOME ED? And >> what will you do if we still search GNOME ED? ( I am not mean for help to >> search GNOME ED, cause we already have GNOME ED committee :) ) >> >

Re: Question to GNOME Foundation Board candidates

Hi Max, On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 7:41 PM, Max wrote: > > > I know there will be more people ask questions about all domain with GNOME, > so I ask 1 question with Asia first. > I have 3 questions to all candidates > Thanks for taking the time to send these questions! > > >

Re: Question to GNOME Foundation Board candidates

Hi Daniel, On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Daniel Espinosa wrote: > Recently has been a campaign to expose GNOME weakness, like: > > * GTK+ is C and ugly > * Bugzilla is old and user unfriendly > * Developers don't here suggestions from users > * No apps for GNOME/GTK+ > >

Re: Question to GNOME Foundation Board candidates

Hi Daniel! On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Daniel Espinosa wrote: > Recently has been a campaign to expose GNOME weakness, like: > > * GTK+ is C and ugly > * Bugzilla is old and user unfriendly > * Developers don't here suggestions from users > * No apps for GNOME/GTK+ > >

Re: Question to GNOME Foundation Board candidates

Hey Max, Thanks for the questions! On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 1:41 AM, Max wrote: ... > 1) How many hours per week do you expect you will be able to dedicate to > working > on the board on a regular basis? > Board work is quite fragmented in my experience, so it's hard to

Re: Question to GNOME Foundation Board candidates

Hi Daniel, Thanks for your questions! Please see my responses below. On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Daniel Espinosa wrote: > > > ** How do you address negative campaigns from *users*? There are a > response on blog.gtk.org, but developer oriented not user oriented, then >