On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 12:44:52AM +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
Hi,
Funny then, that even after nothing being done by GNOME on TC45 since
July (previous to OOXML vote on September 2) ECMA is still claiming
GNOME participates in the disposition of comments:
On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 05:05:08PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
Don't change the subject. The statement I quoted is trollish. There is
no need to say we are shooting at our own feet repeatedly. Especially
without any argument (I do not mean just text in an email). The
announcement was not
quote who=Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
The more you guys keep playing the neutral game, the more you'll get
abused like this.
There is no neutral game being played here. Concerns were raised that the
GNOME Foundation's participation in EMCA TC45-M suggested that we supported
OOXML becoming an ISO
The page says
p align=justifyThe work to standardise OpenXML has been
carried out by Ecma International with representatives from Apple,
Barclays Capital, BP, The British Library, Essilor, Gnome
Foundation, Intel, Microsoft, NextPage, Novell, Statoil, Toshiba,
and the United
On Nov 24, 2007 8:27 PM, Jeff Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is no neutral game being played here. Concerns were raised that the
GNOME Foundation's participation in EMCA TC45-M suggested that we supported
OOXML becoming an ISO standard. Thus, the answer was simple: We do not.
Well except
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 04:11:11AM +0100, BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
On Nov 24, 2007 8:27 PM, Jeff Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is no neutral game being played here. Concerns were raised that the
GNOME Foundation's participation in EMCA TC45-M suggested that we supported
OOXML becoming
