On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 10:03 -0400, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
I would try to go for simple Gnome Conference or maybe Gnome Conf.
I think that GConf is just being too cute.
Agreed GConf isn't a good idea any more than OAF or BONOBO would be.
A name change of a conference usually is done for one of
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 14:52 +0100, Bill Haneman wrote:
IMO the main Board problems are task assignment and delegation.
Reducing the size of the Board won't directly help delegation, and
reducing the available resources by having fewer Directors will only
worsen task assignment/completion
On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 09:45 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
[...] many of us notice that the large
size of the group causes irrelevant distraction, even when urgent
decisions are necessary. That happens even with the best people.
I find it happens with teleconference consisting of only two or
On Mon, 2006-08-14 at 10:51 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
On Fri, 2006-08-11 at 14:12 +0200, Quim Gil wrote:
El dv 11 de 08 del 2006 a les 13:46 +0200, en/na Rodrigo Moya va
escriure:
My question is: how we can have marketing materials easily?
that is also my question :)
What do you
On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 20:30 +0200, Quim Gil wrote:
If you are not into this topic you can probably wait these 5 days. :)
I think in fact the people involved, especially Jeff, deserve
to be applauded for letting people know ahead of time, even
when they felt unable to disclose the details. Jeff
On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 01:05 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
[...]
Feedback is welcome, and volunteers will be cheered :-)
I don't think I have enough time to earn a cheer, I've already
used up all the time I save through not putting on shoes :-)
You could consider a peer-reviewed track at guadec.
On Sat, 2007-07-14 at 17:50 -0400, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
If a long standard is part of an attack, we can use that for our own
purposes.
In this case I suspect that the length of the standard is largely a
consequence of the format being an XML serialization of the existing
complex and
On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 23:40 +0300, Quim Gil wrote:
This is a call for volunteers and interested GNOME lovers in Beijing /
China / East Asia. Please forward to friends and contacts that might
be interested.
The WWW 2008 conference will also be there - maybe it might be
interesting to consider
On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 11:53 +0100, Johannes Schmid wrote:
[...]
Just a short note on the success of bounties. The Anjuta Project
(www.anjuta.org/tasks, list is not completely up-to-date) put bounties
of overall about 4000$ in place about two years ago. Only about half of
those have been worked
On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 09:22 -0500, Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak wrote:
One of the issues forcing me to keep a few MS Windows computer around in
my company are government services relying on Windows-only software,
like this example:
http://www.statcan.ca/english/exports/download.htm
My
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 23:33 -0400, Clare So wrote:
[...]
I agree with you, Behdad. There is no point in pushing for Canada.
When we had a W3C advisory committee meeting in Montreal in November
some 3 years ago it was one of the better attended meetings we'd ever
had (we = W3C).
There is
On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 20:30 +0300, Petri Räsänen wrote:
[...]
As a final remark I believe that one factor in the decision making
process will be the message that will be read between the lines of
the decision. I can speak only speculatively and on behalf of our
proposal, but if the choice is
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 00:14 -0700, navid fk wrote:
it mean i want to use only GTKs libraries and some compilers not
visual IDE for GTK
No-one is forcing you to use an IDE. E.g. gcc is fine.
If you need more information you'd do better to ask on the gtk
list rather than the foundation
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 09:27 -0700, TILLMAN, MICHAEL D9 wrote:
[...]
We can’t go with something that is LESS responsive than our current
“X” applications written in C or C++, and we were wondering if GTK,
generally speaking, is comparable to compiled X applications in
response speeds and memory
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 17:45 -0800, Lefty (石鏡 ) wrote:
On 3/4/10 3:00 PM, Richard Stallman r...@gnu.org wrote:
Let's not be in a rush to invite users to use servers -- even our own
-- instead of their own computers. That is the wrong direction to go.
[...]
I doubt that as many as 10% of
On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 05:29 -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
[...]
Javascript programs are not necessarily bad, but if browsers
temporarily install them silently without checking whether they are
free, that systematically leads users to run nonfree software without
knowing it.
That raises an
On Sun, 2010-03-07 at 21:50 +0100, Goran Rakic wrote:
Dana Ned, 7 Mart, 2010 21:32 , narendra sisodiya je napisao/
Every JavaScript Developer must be instructed to declare global
variable (var LicenseInfo = [gplv3, mit] ) in their first line of
JavaScript file.
There is no standard to do
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 18:32 +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
Hi,
Juanjo Marin wrote:
Is there already any page with a list organizations ?
We can work it out in a dossier about what is GNOME and about a11y GNOME
tecnologies.
Not that I know of. I just started one in the wiki.
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 16:52 -0800, Fernando Herrera wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Ben Konrath b...@bagu.org wrote:
The feedback I received was a similar story; the potential
funders seemed only interested in an applications that would serve
their users who primarily use
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 17:57 +0100, Will Thompson wrote:
Hi,
I've been experimenting with Readability https://www.readability.com
for a couple of months. It's a web service that reformats web pages for
easier reading, and—if you pay for it—maintains a TODO list of those
nicely-formatted
On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 17:32 -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
[...]
The standards made by POSIX, ISO and freedesktop.org are suggestions.
They carry some weight because users typically appreciate
compatibility with standards. But that's not the only thing users
appreciate, so a standard is not a
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 16:26 -0600, Bryen M Yunashko wrote:
[..]
Has anyone come up with a comprehensive list of
one-to-one functions of non-free services and free?
This is the wrong way round. Don't want to imply,
if you like this wonderful proprietary solution,
here's a libre one that's
On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 18:02 -0700, Germán Póo-Caamaño wrote:
[...]
FWIW, I would like us to have public IRC logs. But if a hacker (or
group of them) have privacy concern, we should not dismiss it because
IRC is already public.
+1
We have public logged IRC channels at work, but...
(1) people
On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 09:21 -0400, Allan Day wrote:
It would be great to be able to run something like Bip [1] for GNOME IRC.
Note, it's of course NOT OK to publish public logs of IRC channels (or
any other discussion forum) unless ALL the participants understand that
this will happen and agree
On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 11:38 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 16:07 -0800, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
I'm looking for some charismatic, happy GNOME folks who can help
engage with our community.
This is a good idea, along with building up resources describing goals.
I
On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 18:26 -0600, Brian Cameron wrote:
this advanced
UNIX-hacker type does not seem to be the primary user GNOME is focusing
on anymore.
An open source environment needs to attract four main types of people if
it's going to remain viable -
1. programmers, to work on it
2.
On Fri, 2012-11-16 at 15:57 +0100, Andrea Veri wrote:
The GNOME Foundation Membership Committee is welcoming two new members:
- Federico Mena Quintero
- Fabiana Pedreira Simoes
Congratulations, thank you, and welcome to both of you!
Liam
--
Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C,
On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 09:44 -0800, Lefty wrote:
Mr. Stallman thinks [...]
Please let's not have personal attacks on the foundation list.
The GPL does not prohibit making money; it seeks to prohibit people from
profiting by withholding knowledge from others.
Let's get back to the questions of
On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 13:38 -0500, Emily Gonyer wrote:
Why not just include an About GNOME section in System Settings
It would be a start, but some down sides might be -
. administrators locking away access to about gnome
. people not thinking to look in a configuration tool for information on
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 17:06 -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Richard Stallman r...@gnu.org wrote:
GNU/Linux is mostly used on PCs, but we want it to be used on tablets
and phones too. Thus, making GNOME work well on those machines is
useful. However, until
On Thu, 2013-03-07 at 23:35 +0200, alex diavatis wrote:
I was wondering if you have to encouraging anyone to buy a book about GNOME
from anywhere, and not just Amazon.
There are so many people that work without a profit, why you should promote
something sell-able only?
Free (no price) is not
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 10:02 -0700, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
We are looking into changing our irc server name from irc.gimpnet.org to
irc.gnome.org and looking for feedback.
I think it's a good idea and support it.
Liam
--
Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 10:53 -0700, Germán Póo-Caamaño wrote:
Although, GIMP is an acronym I was not aware that connotation of gimp
(as a non-English speaker I am not aware of many words either).
It's offensive enough that I can't easily talk about it in a work
context, which is unfortunate as
On Thu, 2013-05-09 at 13:28 -0500, meg ford wrote:
As a native English speaker I can verify that the term it is indeed a
problem. The GIMP, however, is widely used by people I know who don't even
know what Free Software is. Changing its name could have pretty negative
consequences for their
On Sat, 2013-05-11 at 01:27 +0900, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
Would you like to join a community where everything you say is
under strict scrutiny ? where you cannot freely express yourself
in your blog without being really careful to make all of your comments
gender neutral and politically
On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 08:57:19 -0500
Michael Catanzaro mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
[...] Whereas the versions of your
applications can probably vary without TOO much trouble, you should only
ever update core components like gnome-shell, gnome-settings-daemon, and
gnome-control-center at the same
-infringement-lawsuits.html
--
Liam R. E. Quin l...@holoweb.net
http://www.fromoldbooks.org/
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
On Mon, 2016-09-12 at 12:07 -0700, Nuritzi Sanchez wrote:
> proposing to draw up a standard code of conduct for GNOME events.
You could maybe start with the libregraphicsmeeting.org policy,
http://libregraphicsmeeting.org/lgm/public-documentation/code-of-conduc
t/
Liam
--
Liam R. E. Quin
On Sun, 2018-03-18 at 16:46 +0800, Tong Hui wrote:
> Good news that you stay with us! Yes our goal is solving problem, not
> just leave them there and withdrawing. Sorry that I modify your
> subject.
Yes, I was very pleased to see the second letter. It takes strength to
apologise in public in
On Wed, 2018-12-05 at 11:22 +0100, Andrea Veri wrote:
> Hey,
>
> the projects-old website [1] was decided to be left around in 2013
> right after transitioning projects pages to the GNOME's wiki
> (projects.g.o is a vhost that contains a set of redirects since then)
i think you mean
nism would make the most sense. As i said,
there's lots of links to projects-old.gnome.org.
Liam
>
> cheers,
> Il giorno mer 5 dic 2018 alle ore 21:10 Liam R E Quin
> ha scritto:
> > On Wed, 2018-12-05 at 11:22 +0100, Andrea Veri wrote:
> > > Hey,
> > >
>
On Thu, 2018-12-06 at 22:42 +0100, Andrea Veri wrote:
> . Do you see any value in
> keeping those URLs around even if they're historical and not relevant
> since several years?
There's intertwined questions here...
* the old URLs should continue to resolve to useful resources, even if
they are
42 matches
Mail list logo
