On 12/09/2009 01:47 PM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
The way I understand what Frédéric said is, there is an (yet another
one?) interesting question not answered by the p.g.o slogan. What does the
planet maintainers do with people who stop being involved in the project.
Sometimes people who are not
On 06/25/2009 12:30 PM, john palmieri wrote:
If it is a disagreement on how votes should be counted then the vote is
flawed and I propose we have a runoff between the candidates who were on
one list but not the other.
I'm not terribly familiar with STV and its variations, but it seems to
me
Murray Cumming wrote:
I wouldn't feel optimistic about a code of conduct that didn't represent
our current consensus.
...
However, there's no shortage of people saying both that
- Some improvement in behaviour is necessary
These points don't fit together. If we are just making the current
Luis Villa wrote:
Trademark law doesn't give us the flexibility we want, which leaves us
with options (as I see it) that are basically:
* pursue the Mozilla route (strong trademark)...
* collaborate with our lawyers to create and pursue a completely
novel/untested/potentially completely
